Moderators: netwolf, dagny, pfim, Three Stars



C4 Row E wrote:Fleury was the only reason the Pens were in the game as long as they were last night. The team is just not producing enough offense right now with 4 starters out of the lineup, which is to be expected. It'll all come full circle soon enough. 12-4 with the injury bug hitting early. No complaints here.

offsides wrote:C4 Row E wrote:Fleury was the only reason the Pens were in the game as long as they were last night. The team is just not producing enough offense right now with 4 starters out of the lineup, which is to be expected. It'll all come full circle soon enough. 12-4 with the injury bug hitting early. No complaints here.
Yep, I hate to say it, but our so called depth at forward is nonexistent. Bourque and Conner are borderline NHL players. We are going to have to stay healthy because no one at WBS seems to be stepping up.


Pitt87 wrote:offsides wrote:C4 Row E wrote:Fleury was the only reason the Pens were in the game as long as they were last night. The team is just not producing enough offense right now with 4 starters out of the lineup, which is to be expected. It'll all come full circle soon enough. 12-4 with the injury bug hitting early. No complaints here.
Yep, I hate to say it, but our so called depth at forward is nonexistent. Bourque and Conner are borderline NHL players. We are going to have to stay healthy because no one at WBS seems to be stepping up.
You have to be kidding; Bourque and Connor have very little NHL experience and you can't count on them to score when they get the least TOI on the team. We have the most GF in the NHL, and the scoring champion hasn't played in a week. Mike Rupp has 4 goals, and we're getting scoring from all 4 lines plus hardly even talking about missing Gonchar.
Fleury had a ton of traffic going to the net last night, especially from Ryan Smyth. That line killed us, but Fleury handled it better than he has in the past. He's becoming a pretty mature goaltender...



steelhammer wrote:for all the OMG, Fleury is NHL best, start on team canada for sure talk; he is is 19th in the league in sv%. he is behind Emery (kind of far actually), Biron and Osgood (god that's painful to type).

offsides wrote:Pitt87 wrote:offsides wrote:Yep, I hate to say it, but our so called depth at forward is nonexistent. Bourque and Conner are borderline NHL players. We are going to have to stay healthy because no one at WBS seems to be stepping up.
You have to be kidding; Bourque and Connor have very little NHL experience and you can't count on them to score when they get the least TOI on the team. We have the most GF in the NHL, and the scoring champion hasn't played in a week. Mike Rupp has 4 goals, and we're getting scoring from all 4 lines plus hardly even talking about missing Gonchar.
Fleury had a ton of traffic going to the net last night, especially from Ryan Smyth. That line killed us, but Fleury handled it better than he has in the past. He's becoming a pretty mature goaltender...
Actually we are tenth in the league in goals per game at 3.12. The Flyers are first at 3.67. You are also making my point by saying we cannot count on certain players to score because we have very little "quality" depth at forward. They don't get ice time for a reason; they can't play very well.

DocEmrick wrote:I think it's possible that the Pittsburgh Penguins have a goaltending controversy. Anyone else?

Pitt87 wrote:
I think you are missing the point; .5 point difference is not much through 16 games, especially when the team on top has played 1/4 fewer games than most of the league. That said, we have scoring coming from 14 different players this year, and 14 players have played in all 16 games. Only 21 players have played in games so far, so its not like we've put 10 WBS guys on the ice.
You're right, but your thoughts about depth cannot be based on 2 guys who haven't played in the NHL for a reasonable period of time. Bourque and Connor don't get time because they are prospects, and it might be too early for either one to be regular players in this program, but its not fair to say we don't have depth because those two guys who haven't played much haven't scored. Just be patient...

offsides wrote:Pitt87 wrote:
I think you are missing the point; .5 point difference is not much through 16 games, especially when the team on top has played 1/4 fewer games than most of the league. That said, we have scoring coming from 14 different players this year, and 14 players have played in all 16 games. Only 21 players have played in games so far, so its not like we've put 10 WBS guys on the ice.
You're right, but your thoughts about depth cannot be based on 2 guys who haven't played in the NHL for a reasonable period of time. Bourque and Connor don't get time because they are prospects, and it might be too early for either one to be regular players in this program, but its not fair to say we don't have depth because those two guys who haven't played much haven't scored. Just be patient...
Maybe we are comparing apples to oranges here, but when I say depth, I mean people who can step up and play well when injuries occur. Goaltending depth is having someone who can fill in for an injured or tired goalie with very little if any difference, which we have. As far as I can see, we do not have anyone who can fill in when injuries occur at the forward position. All we have are "prospects" for our depth. I also do not see anyone at WBS who looks like they can fill in for more them 7 minutes of ice time a game just to give the starters a breather.

C4 Row E wrote:offsides wrote:Pitt87 wrote:
I think you are missing the point; .5 point difference is not much through 16 games, especially when the team on top has played 1/4 fewer games than most of the league. That said, we have scoring coming from 14 different players this year, and 14 players have played in all 16 games. Only 21 players have played in games so far, so its not like we've put 10 WBS guys on the ice.
You're right, but your thoughts about depth cannot be based on 2 guys who haven't played in the NHL for a reasonable period of time. Bourque and Connor don't get time because they are prospects, and it might be too early for either one to be regular players in this program, but its not fair to say we don't have depth because those two guys who haven't played much haven't scored. Just be patient...
Maybe we are comparing apples to oranges here, but when I say depth, I mean people who can step up and play well when injuries occur. Goaltending depth is having someone who can fill in for an injured or tired goalie with very little if any difference, which we have. As far as I can see, we do not have anyone who can fill in when injuries occur at the forward position. All we have are "prospects" for our depth. I also do not see anyone at WBS who looks like they can fill in for more them 7 minutes of ice time a game just to give the starters a breather.
If Tangradi and Caputi cant fill more than 7 minutes of ice time next season this team is hurting. Guerin and Fedotenko won't be back. I believe RS is expecting these 2 to fill their roles on this team.



offsides wrote:Pitt87 wrote:
I think you are missing the point; .5 point difference is not much through 16 games, especially when the team on top has played 1/4 fewer games than most of the league. That said, we have scoring coming from 14 different players this year, and 14 players have played in all 16 games. Only 21 players have played in games so far, so its not like we've put 10 WBS guys on the ice.
You're right, but your thoughts about depth cannot be based on 2 guys who haven't played in the NHL for a reasonable period of time. Bourque and Connor don't get time because they are prospects, and it might be too early for either one to be regular players in this program, but its not fair to say we don't have depth because those two guys who haven't played much haven't scored. Just be patient...
Maybe we are comparing apples to oranges here, but when I say depth, I mean people who can step up and play well when injuries occur. Goaltending depth is having someone who can fill in for an injured or tired goalie with very little if any difference, which we have. As far as I can see, we do not have anyone who can fill in when injuries occur at the forward position. All we have are "prospects" for our depth. I also do not see anyone at WBS who looks like they can fill in for more them 7 minutes of ice time a game just to give the starters a breather.

bhaw wrote:
Maybe you could point us all to a team that can cycle a guy in to cover for an injury like Malkin? Or maybe you could show me a team that has top 6 talent just sitting around waiting for an injury.
It doesn't happen. Any team that gets hurt in their top 6 will not have anything besides "prospects" to fill in those positions because you can't afford 9 top six players.


offsides wrote:bhaw wrote:
Maybe you could point us all to a team that can cycle a guy in to cover for an injury like Malkin? Or maybe you could show me a team that has top 6 talent just sitting around waiting for an injury.
It doesn't happen. Any team that gets hurt in their top 6 will not have anything besides "prospects" to fill in those positions because you can't afford 9 top six players.
Maybe I should have said prospects that look like they know how to play hockey. I agree with everything you said, but our prospects are just disappointing to say the least. If we have to depend on them for any length of time, or even next year, we could be hurting.

Users browsing this forum: Dr. Penguin, kalika, tjand72, Vanbiesbrouck and 11 guests