Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

EagleMorph wrote:I don't like giving up Noah Welch for Roberts.
I don't mind getting Roberts, but I don't think Welch is the right price. It should be Ouellet.

EagleMorph wrote:I don't like giving up Noah Welch for Roberts.
I don't mind getting Roberts, but I don't think Welch is the right price. It should be Ouellet.

EagleMorph wrote:I don't like giving up Noah Welch for Roberts.
I don't mind getting Roberts, but I don't think Welch is the right price. It should be Ouellet.
ChinookUT wrote:EagleMorph wrote:I don't like giving up Noah Welch for Roberts.
I don't mind getting Roberts, but I don't think Welch is the right price. It should be Ouellet.
Ouellet has shown a lot more promise than Welch. Besides, Shero has yet to make a disappointing move. I trust his judgement as far as Welch is concerned.

magnum wrote:EagleMorph wrote:I don't like giving up Noah Welch for Roberts.
I don't mind getting Roberts, but I don't think Welch is the right price. It should be Ouellet.
Nobody wants Ouellet. You couldn't trade Ouellet for a 40 year old. Welch at least has upside and potential somewhere. Ouellet is basically a guy that Malkin and Staal have made look serviceable, otherwise he'd have a hard time cracking most rosters (except Gretzky's)
I don't have a problem with trading Welch for Roberts. It doesn't look like it's going to happen but it appears that the organization isn't real happy with his progress and development. It's safe to say that the guy has regressed this year which isn't what you want out of a guy who was suppose to be one of your best defensive prospects.

ChinookUT wrote:magnum wrote:Nobody wants Ouellet.
Unless you can speak for league-wide GMs, I'd actually be willing to wager that several GMs wouldn't mind having him on a wait-and-see basis. He had 20 good games straight, and it wasn't because he was winging with Staal and Malkin.

magnum wrote:I don't have a problem with trading Welch for Roberts. It doesn't look like it's going to happen but it appears that the organization isn't real happy with his progress and development. It's safe to say that the guy has regressed this year which isn't what you want out of a guy who was suppose to be one of your best defensive prospects.

EagleMorph wrote:magnum wrote:EagleMorph wrote:I don't like giving up Noah Welch for Roberts.
I don't mind getting Roberts, but I don't think Welch is the right price. It should be Ouellet.
Nobody wants Ouellet. You couldn't trade Ouellet for a 40 year old. Welch at least has upside and potential somewhere. Ouellet is basically a guy that Malkin and Staal have made look serviceable, otherwise he'd have a hard time cracking most rosters (except Gretzky's)
I don't have a problem with trading Welch for Roberts. It doesn't look like it's going to happen but it appears that the organization isn't real happy with his progress and development. It's safe to say that the guy has regressed this year which isn't what you want out of a guy who was suppose to be one of your best defensive prospects.
I'm just more hesitant to trade a young defenseman with promise and skill, even during a poor year, than I am to trade a winger.



joopen wrote:EagleMorph wrote:I don't like giving up Noah Welch for Roberts.
I don't mind getting Roberts, but I don't think Welch is the right price. It should be Ouellet.
Welch seems to have lost his appeal to this organization. I think they expected him to be NHL ready for this year and has not developed into what they hoped for at this point in time. They want to use his value to bring in a vet. who can help this team in a playoff series.

careyz8 wrote:joopen wrote:EagleMorph wrote:I don't like giving up Noah Welch for Roberts.
I don't mind getting Roberts, but I don't think Welch is the right price. It should be Ouellet.
Welch seems to have lost his appeal to this organization. I think they expected him to be NHL ready for this year and has not developed into what they hoped for at this point in time. They want to use his value to bring in a vet. who can help this team in a playoff series.
I think its a little hard for a guy who has only played 27 games in the big league for a team to go sour on him. He's only taken a whole 19 shots on goal in his Pitt career. He isnt doing too bad in WBS this year either: 21 pts in 27 games and is a +8. I dont think id give up on him just yet.

Corvidae wrote:Like I said, Welch is 24 years old and he can't crack the lineup of a team with Scudari and Melichar on the blueline. I wouldn't be upset if he was traded.

crzymike wrote:ITS OFFICIAL! At least according to tsn roberts agreed to waive his no trade clause, hes a PENGUINO!

His inability to excel at the AHL level on a consistent level is what has them most concerned. The issue becomes compounded because now the front office isn't sure if he's ready to step in here next year and play well enough to merit even a spot on the third pairing. And after this year, they can't just send him back to Wilkes-Barre. He has to clear waivers if they send him down - something he'll never do if they tried.


Users browsing this forum: burghsportsguys, DelPen, Great58, Idoit40fans, marek, mikey287, PAPLine, pcm, pfim and 33 guests