Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

Henry Hank wrote:Like Orpik, I think the Pens need to make a decision on Malone now. There's no time left to wait for him to start developing. He's a free agent after next season so the main thing to worry about is will he contribute enough to next year's team to be worth having?
I actually think Malone is starting to settle in as a solid third liner. He's a good penalty killer. He would have had three straight 20 goal seasons if not for his injury. On the other hand, I think he's proven by now that he's not going to produce as everyone hoped he would. If he can't produce with Crosby, well, that's it. Everyone trashes Recchi but he put up nearly 70 points as a 39-year-old with Crosby and that would have been top three on most teams.
Malone wouldn't be a bad third liner especially because of what he brings on the PK, but the Pens may have a bit of a log jam if Recchi and Roberts come back. Malone's the best choice to go because they could replace him with a fourth line center, for example, who is good on faceoffs and can replace Malone on the PK. Maybe soon-to-be former Predator Scott Nichol would be a good choice.

Henry Hank wrote:Like Orpik, I think the Pens need to make a decision on Malone now. There's no time left to wait for him to start developing. He's a free agent after next season so the main thing to worry about is will he contribute enough to next year's team to be worth having?
I actually think Malone is starting to settle in as a solid third liner. He's a good penalty killer. He would have had three straight 20 goal seasons if not for his injury. On the other hand, I think he's proven by now that he's not going to produce as everyone hoped he would. If he can't produce with Crosby, well, that's it. Everyone trashes Recchi but he put up nearly 70 points as a 39-year-old with Crosby and that would have been top three on most teams.
Malone wouldn't be a bad third liner especially because of what he brings on the PK, but the Pens may have a bit of a log jam if Recchi and Roberts come back. Malone's the best choice to go because they could replace him with a fourth line center, for example, who is good on faceoffs and can replace Malone on the PK. Maybe soon-to-be former Predator Scott Nichol would be a good choice.

Mad City Mike wrote:Henry Hank wrote:Like Orpik, I think the Pens need to make a decision on Malone now. There's no time left to wait for him to start developing. He's a free agent after next season so the main thing to worry about is will he contribute enough to next year's team to be worth having?
I actually think Malone is starting to settle in as a solid third liner. He's a good penalty killer. He would have had three straight 20 goal seasons if not for his injury. On the other hand, I think he's proven by now that he's not going to produce as everyone hoped he would. If he can't produce with Crosby, well, that's it. Everyone trashes Recchi but he put up nearly 70 points as a 39-year-old with Crosby and that would have been top three on most teams.
Malone wouldn't be a bad third liner especially because of what he brings on the PK, but the Pens may have a bit of a log jam if Recchi and Roberts come back. Malone's the best choice to go because they could replace him with a fourth line center, for example, who is good on faceoffs and can replace Malone on the PK. Maybe soon-to-be former Predator Scott Nichol would be a good choice.
Malone will be gone if there are any takers. And finding a taker won't be easy. He is a 28-year-old middling type of player. As you say, he's a third liner at best. If I am the Pens, I can fill that role with a Ryan Stone for much less money than I'd have to pay Malone.




davemess wrote:Gotta keep him around on the 3rd line...... $1.45 mill isnt a huge figure considering it cost $1.2 to get guys like Ruutu under contract in last years free agency period.
I've always felt that Malone produces his best hockey when he is the key offensive cog on his line, playing with Talbot and Armstrong for a full year would give him that and provide the team a fantastic 3rd line.


Malone's numbers look less and less impressive when you take into account he had 2 hat tricks.

Jesse wrote:I think Filewich makes the team next year at some point.
Outside of Penalty Killing, he could be an adequate replacement.


Jesse wrote:I think Filewich makes the team next year at some point.
Outside of Penalty Killing, he could be an adequate replacement.
Malone's numbers look less and less impressive when you take into account he had 2 hat tricks.


netwolf wrote:Jesse wrote:Malone's numbers look less and less impressive when you take into account he had 2 hat tricks.
Hat tricks are bad now?![]()

emptyfriend wrote:netwolf wrote:Jesse wrote:Malone's numbers look less and less impressive when you take into account he had 2 hat tricks.
Hat tricks are bad now?![]()
I think his point was when you factor in the 2 hat tricks, 6 goals in 2 games, he really didn't score in that many games now did he?

netwolf wrote:emptyfriend wrote:netwolf wrote:Jesse wrote:Malone's numbers look less and less impressive when you take into account he had 2 hat tricks.
Hat tricks are bad now?![]()
I think his point was when you factor in the 2 hat tricks, 6 goals in 2 games, he really didn't score in that many games now did he?
I know what he meant, hence the



Users browsing this forum: Headshot77, Scate, Shakes, Staggy and 36 guests