Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

As pathetic as our defense was this past year or three, he undoubtly would be an upgrade and as it was alluded to, he wouldnt break the bank.puckeye wrote:http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/article.jsp?content=20070622_113122_2064
Sarich is 28, but has become a seasoned pro. He combines a solid point shot with superb one-on-one hitting skills, throwing the kind of devastating body checks that can change the momentum of a hockey game. He's not an offensive monster, but he can create plays that others finish (particularly off his big shot) and he does keep a game honest, especially in his own end.
Sarich blossomed into a pros pro under the direction of former Tampa Associate Coach Craig Ramsay who teaches players to be smart in aggressive in all three zones on the ice and Sarich does that. He's a definite top four that has the ability to grow into a top two defenceman and perhaps break through on the offensive side of the game as well. Sarich made $1,900,000 last season and because he has low offensive numbers, likely won't cost a whole lot more on the open market, which would make him a true bargain.

puckeye wrote:http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/article.jsp?content=20070622_113122_2064
Sarich is 28, but has become a seasoned pro. He combines a solid point shot with superb one-on-one hitting skills, throwing the kind of devastating body checks that can change the momentum of a hockey game. He's not an offensive monster, but he can create plays that others finish (particularly off his big shot) and he does keep a game honest, especially in his own end.
Sarich blossomed into a pros pro under the direction of former Tampa Associate Coach Craig Ramsay who teaches players to be smart in aggressive in all three zones on the ice and Sarich does that. He's a definite top four that has the ability to grow into a top two defenceman and perhaps break through on the offensive side of the game as well. Sarich made $1,900,000 last season and because he has low offensive numbers, likely won't cost a whole lot more on the open market, which would make him a true bargain.

puckeye wrote:Sarich made $1,900,000 last season and because he has low offensive numbers, likely won't cost a whole lot more on the open market, which would make him a true bargain.[/i]

Mad City Mike wrote:puckeye wrote:Sarich made $1,900,000 last season and because he has low offensive numbers, likely won't cost a whole lot more on the open market, which would make him a true bargain.[/i]
I guess Mr. Kelley never heard of Jay McKee. While Sarich might not reach quite that high, he will be in the $3 mil a year neighborhood.

DelPen wrote:Mad City Mike wrote:puckeye wrote:Sarich made $1,900,000 last season and because he has low offensive numbers, likely won't cost a whole lot more on the open market, which would make him a true bargain.[/i]
I guess Mr. Kelley never heard of Jay McKee. While Sarich might not reach quite that high, he will be in the $3 mil a year neighborhood.
Kubina: $5 million
Johnsson: $4.05 million
McKee: $4 million
Kuba: $3 million
Corvo: $2.5 million
I think Sarich is easily in this class of players if not better than most of them and seeing as how Timonen already got $6.3 million Sarich is easily going to get at least $4 million.


Henry Hank wrote:$4 million for Sarich is crazy. He basically was fifth on Tampa's depth chart on D at the end of the season. Tampa's D ain't Ottawa's; their fifth best defenseman isn't worth $4 million. A 3rd pairing defenseman for the Pens isn't worth that. If someone wants to pay him that whatever, but the Pens would be stupid to pay that kind of money to a guy who's not really that good.




Henry Hank wrote:$4 million for Sarich is crazy. He basically was fifth on Tampa's depth chart on D at the end of the season. Tampa's D ain't Ottawa's; their fifth best defenseman isn't worth $4 million. A 3rd pairing defenseman for the Pens isn't worth that. If someone wants to pay him that whatever, but the Pens would be stupid to pay that kind of money to a guy who's not really that good.

PensBeerGeek wrote:Henry Hank wrote:$4 million for Sarich is crazy. He basically was fifth on Tampa's depth chart on D at the end of the season. Tampa's D ain't Ottawa's; their fifth best defenseman isn't worth $4 million. A 3rd pairing defenseman for the Pens isn't worth that. If someone wants to pay him that whatever, but the Pens would be stupid to pay that kind of money to a guy who's not really that good.
Well, people are going to overpay for him because he's a right-handed shot, plain and simple.
Personally, it's a nice luxury, but I don't think I'd pay more than $500k over the comparable dman that shoots left.

I cant say I agree with you on this one HH. The fact is NO ONE on this defense was anything to right home about with the exception of Eaton before he got injured the 1st time. I cant believe Sarich is as bad as even our best defensemen in our own end. He most certainly would be an upgrade, if nothing else but to push Melichar off the team (not retaining him).Henry Hank wrote:Melichar and Scuderi are absolutely better defenseman than Orpik. Why else did they play several more minutes a game and were trusted in for important situations? No, the correct answer is not because they are Therrien's favorites. They were our top PK defenseman and Orpik was 6/6 on the depth chart in that area. Actually, 7/7 because when Nas was in the lineup he was used on the PK over Orpik. Orpik isn't good.
In a vacuum, I'd take Sarich over those guys but in reality the guys we had were much more cost effective as third pairing guys. You'd be stupid to pay a third pairing defenseman several million and you'd be stupid to go and get a guy who's a third pairing guy, pay him several million, and then expand his role. If the choice for a third pairing defenseman is Melichar at a million and Sarich at three or four million, absolutely I'd take Melichar every time.

I cant say I agree with you on this one HH. The fact is NO ONE on this defense was anything to right home about with the exception of Eaton before he got injured the 1st time. I cant believe Sarich is as bad as even our best defensemen in our own end. He most certainly would be an upgrade, if nothing else but to push Melichar off the team (not retaining him).

I wouldnt spend 4 million on him either but I might go for around three. I can tell you this , on this dismal defense Sarich would likely play as a top four defensemen. My thinking is this, if we replace Melichar and Scuderi or NAZ and add Letang and Sarich, then weve upgraded the position. If we are talking 4 million plus then I would want Hannan.Henry Hank wrote:I cant say I agree with you on this one HH. The fact is NO ONE on this defense was anything to right home about with the exception of Eaton before he got injured the 1st time. I cant believe Sarich is as bad as even our best defensemen in our own end. He most certainly would be an upgrade, if nothing else but to push Melichar off the team (not retaining him).
I wouldn't spend $4 million just to push Melichar off the team, and realistically the difference between Melichar and Sarich isn't that drastic. Tampa's D was pretty good last year but it's not leaps and bounds ahead of the Pens. This isn't Ottawa depth we're talking about here. Sarich is a bottom pairing defenseman on a good team and I want the Pens to be a good team. Signing Sarich to an overpriced contract and playing him over his head is not the path to making this team better.


I doubt many in the know would agree with you regarding Melichar, he stinks. As I stated I wouldnt pay Sarich 4 million either but hes a hell of alot better then Melichar or Scuderi. If Melichar is so effective then I guess RS will retain his services.Henry Hank wrote:I think Sarich is a slight upgrade over Melichar but taking their contracts into consideration taking Melichar is the no brainer. The Pens would be fools to settle for Sarich at an overpriced rate in an overextended role just because there isn't a great deal out there for them. Shero wants a veteran defenseman for Letang on the third pairing. Go and sign Darryl Sydor to a reasonable one year deal. He's got the tools to succeed in today's NHL, he's still a legitimate top four defenseman on a good team, and he won't require a team to give him an overpriced salary for several years.
I'm glad you guys aren't the GM because in two and three year's we'd be feeling really stupid paying Cory Sarich $4 million to be a fifth defenseman while we try to re-sign our stars.

If Melichar is so effective then I guess RS will retain his services.

I disagree with you on this matter HH, but I respect your opinion nonetheless.Henry Hank wrote:If Melichar is so effective then I guess RS will retain his services.
Maybe he will. If the free agent market is as ridiculous as you guys want it to be than Shero absolutely should look into bringing back Melichar or Scuderi and placing them in their proper roles. There's no reason to overpay for a third pairing defenseman. Absolutely none. And there's really no reason for a team to overpay a third pairing defenseman and play him in the top four just for the heck of it.


Users browsing this forum: Defence21, opie22002, sdadowski and 19 guests