Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

Pitts wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Not once have I hate on Crosby, he is simply one of the best, but to be completely arrogant and neglectful towards what Malkin did this year is just ridiculous in my opinion. And what I am saying is that what Malkin did this season is jsut a glimpse.
Please tell us, where did anyone neglect what Malkin did this year.
We started a conversation about a "possible" trade scenario involving Malkin and you, in your lust for him, turned it into a p issing contest about who is better -- Crosby or Malkin.
Some of us are trying to have an educated conversation about real trade possibilities.

newarenanow wrote:duke66 wrote:...yes it's clear this thread has totally gone to seed...and i've already ranted about my views, so i'm not going to re-hash...but it has become abundantly clear to me, nothing, and i mean nothing will ever make a good chunk of the posters on this site happy EVER...pens suck, boo hoo, pens rebuild, not fast enough, pens make playoffs, we suck losing to the sens in 5, pens come within 2 wins of the cup, trade the best/second best player in the world because the team won't be able to afford him...like it's your money to worry about spending...
I'm not upset. I love this team, this season, and Malkin. It's not about spending the money, it's about fitting salaries under the cap and still fielding a complete team. it's reality.

André wrote:kirk wrote:Why is it that Sid needs a great winger while Geno can be instrumental in turning a guy like Sykora play like he did 8 years ago and a guy like Malone into someone who likely has priced himself out of Pittsburgh? Honestly, it makes me wonder how this year would have played out if Geno, rather than Sid, had missed 1/3 of the year with a high ankle sprain.
What? Sid's been with crappy wingers (mostly Recchi and a checking forward) until the Hossa trade.
Malkin had Staal his first year and this year Malone and Sykora, which are very good wingers for a playmaking center.
I've mostly disagreed with the negative posts on Malkin in this thread but that was just too off in the other direction, imo.

Kovy27 wrote:duke66 wrote:Kovy27 wrote: I have more hockey intelligence in my left nut than you do in your brain.
...that response leads me to believe u are barely out of high school...but i digress...ok u make a point as well, and i'm willing to acknowledge when people make a point, u know that's what adults do...yes i really have no more right to bash malkin trade rumours/speculation, then u and others have to actually discuss the matter...and let me clear some things up, i don't support malkin over crosby, or vice versa, i support the penguins as a team...
...the whole point i was trying to make, was, it would be foolish IMO for the pens to trade away malkin at this stage in his career...obviously u feel differently about it and that's cool...but sometimes i think people like to post outrageous s*** just so they can come on after the fact and brag if they are right...u may think that's what i may do as well...but i know better...
If 11 years out of high school is barely out...then yeah, I guess so.
The rumor is just that...A RUMOR. It gets more credible when it is delivered from someone inside the hockey world. I heard this rumor right after the Stanley Cup was handed out. I don't get why people are on high horses or not fans because they want to talk about the POSSIBILITY of a player being moved. Explain that to me.

HeyNow71871929 wrote:AlexPKeaton wrote:Malkin is a player that any team can build an entire offense around. Malkin will run the powerplay. Malkin will make his linemates significantly better. Malkin will score the big goal. And Malkin will annually threaten for the Art Ross trophy baring injury. Just like Sid. Every GM in the league wants this type of player on there team.
Giving up a player like that for *at best* the same quality 2nd line spread over two players is folly to me. If I'm giving up an extremely young, all-world, build-your-offense-around forward like Malkin, then I want an extremely young, all-world, build-your-defense-around defensemen *and* a decent 2nd line replacement.
The fact of the matter is. You just aren't going to get equal value in return if you trade Malkin. Whether you trade him straight up for another player or you trade him for a package, there is simply no equal trade value you can get in return.

Pipes Hochuli wrote:if we resign hossa, then this trade wouldn't be made until this time next year....is that the logic we're basing this possibility on?
thats what would make sense to me at least.

HeyNow71871929 wrote:Pitts wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Pitts brought up the fact that Malkin getting traded would be better for Sid, because he would get more ice time. And I just wanted to know if Sid actually wanted to be a one man show, if Sid actually wanted more ice time by not sharing the spotlight with someone else.
All I said was it would "allow" more ice time for Sid. Never did I try to answer for him.
Well the simple reason that you suggested something like that made me voice my opinion to go against what you said. I have no control over what other people say and they chose to run with it. I believe earlier in this thread I also clearly stated that I don't want to turn this into a Malkin vs. Crosby thread because we are blessed and honored to have both of these guys playing for our team.

Pitts wrote:AlexPKeaton wrote:My point is that Malkin + average wingers is far better than Kopitar and Brown + average winger in terms of production, and a wash in terms of salary.
I think it would be more along the likes of:
Brown/Crosby/Hossa
Malone/Kopitar/Sykora
Winger/Staal/Ruutu
Blah, blah, blah...

kirk wrote:André wrote:kirk wrote:Why is it that Sid needs a great winger while Geno can be instrumental in turning a guy like Sykora play like he did 8 years ago and a guy like Malone into someone who likely has priced himself out of Pittsburgh? Honestly, it makes me wonder how this year would have played out if Geno, rather than Sid, had missed 1/3 of the year with a high ankle sprain.
What? Sid's been with crappy wingers (mostly Recchi and a checking forward) until the Hossa trade.
Malkin had Staal his first year and this year Malone and Sykora, which are very good wingers for a playmaking center.
I've mostly disagreed with the negative posts on Malkin in this thread but that was just too off in the other direction, imo.
Let's see . . .
Staal only has thrived on Geno's wing. He was **** with Sid.
Sykora was **** with Sid and then time warped back to Sykora circa 2000 on Geno's wing.
Malone was spotty on Sid's wing and probably has priced himself out of Pittsburgh after half a season on Geno's wing.
Perhaps all of this begs the question as to why Sid needs Hossa?
The answer IMO is that Sid plays the game at two speeds, high tempo and higher tempo. A great player like Hossa (or even Malkin out of position) will get points with Sid. A guy who plays up tempo hockey, like an Army or a Talbot, can play above himself when he gets hot hands. Sykora didn't fit that. Malone and Staal couldn't keep up. Malkin, by contrast, adapts his game to best utilize his wingers and to make 2.5M type of guys into 5M performers.
kirk wrote:Pitts wrote:AlexPKeaton wrote:My point is that Malkin + average wingers is far better than Kopitar and Brown + average winger in terms of production, and a wash in terms of salary.
I think it would be more along the likes of:
Brown/Crosby/Hossa
Malone/Kopitar/Sykora
Winger/Staal/Ruutu
Blah, blah, blah...
And, can Kopitar do for Malone and Sykora even one half of what Geno did? After all, Sid at various times played with those two, and things didn't go so well.

pronovost19 wrote:Kovy27 wrote:duke66 wrote:Kovy27 wrote: I have more hockey intelligence in my left nut than you do in your brain.
...that response leads me to believe u are barely out of high school...but i digress...ok u make a point as well, and i'm willing to acknowledge when people make a point, u know that's what adults do...yes i really have no more right to bash malkin trade rumours/speculation, then u and others have to actually discuss the matter...and let me clear some things up, i don't support malkin over crosby, or vice versa, i support the penguins as a team...
...the whole point i was trying to make, was, it would be foolish IMO for the pens to trade away malkin at this stage in his career...obviously u feel differently about it and that's cool...but sometimes i think people like to post outrageous s*** just so they can come on after the fact and brag if they are right...u may think that's what i may do as well...but i know better...
If 11 years out of high school is barely out...then yeah, I guess so.
The rumor is just that...A RUMOR. It gets more credible when it is delivered from someone inside the hockey world. I heard this rumor right after the Stanley Cup was handed out. I don't get why people are on high horses or not fans because they want to talk about the POSSIBILITY of a player being moved. Explain that to me.
Exactly Kovy...and the what if scenarios lead us all to that happy place...what would we do if we were the GM...

Pitts wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Not once have I hate on Crosby, he is simply one of the best, but to be completely arrogant and neglectful towards what Malkin did this year is just ridiculous in my opinion. And what I am saying is that what Malkin did this season is jsut a glimpse.
Please tell us, where did anyone neglect what Malkin did this year.
We started a conversation about a "possible" trade scenario involving Malkin and you, in your lust for him, turned it into a p issing contest about who is better -- Crosby or Malkin.
Some of us are trying to have an educated conversation about real trade possibilities.

Pensrock wrote:The problem is Malkin takes shifts and even games off sometimes. Crosby rarely if ever does that.
When Malkin is on his game he is electric. There is no doubt about that. But when is off his game, he is invisible.
Even is Crosby is off, he is always busting his @ss and making plays in other ways.
I am not going to say one is better than the other because I think it is a stupid argument. They are two different style players in my opinion.HeyNow71871929 wrote:newarenanow wrote:Pitts wrote:newarenanow wrote:I don't know where you are getting Malkin >
I never said Crosby hasn't done well. Hes been extraordinary. I just think that Malkin brings more to the table than Crosby does. And that he will soon become the best in the world. The explosiveness Malkin brings every time he steps on the ice is unmatchable.
Everytime Crosby steps on the ice, you feel something is going to happen for the Penguins.
Everytime Malkin steps on the ice, you feel a goal is going to happen for the Penguins.

kirk wrote:Pitts wrote:AlexPKeaton wrote:My point is that Malkin + average wingers is far better than Kopitar and Brown + average winger in terms of production, and a wash in terms of salary.
I think it would be more along the likes of:
Brown/Crosby/Hossa
Malone/Kopitar/Sykora
Winger/Staal/Ruutu
Blah, blah, blah...
And, can Kopitar do for Malone and Sykora even one half of what Geno did? After all, Sid at various times played with those two, and things didn't go so well.

Rohit wrote:pronovost19 wrote:Kovy27 wrote:duke66 wrote:Kovy27 wrote: I have more hockey intelligence in my left nut than you do in your brain.
...that response leads me to believe u are barely out of high school...but i digress...ok u make a point as well, and i'm willing to acknowledge when people make a point, u know that's what adults do...yes i really have no more right to bash malkin trade rumours/speculation, then u and others have to actually discuss the matter...and let me clear some things up, i don't support malkin over crosby, or vice versa, i support the penguins as a team...
...the whole point i was trying to make, was, it would be foolish IMO for the pens to trade away malkin at this stage in his career...obviously u feel differently about it and that's cool...but sometimes i think people like to post outrageous s*** just so they can come on after the fact and brag if they are right...u may think that's what i may do as well...but i know better...
If 11 years out of high school is barely out...then yeah, I guess so.
The rumor is just that...A RUMOR. It gets more credible when it is delivered from someone inside the hockey world. I heard this rumor right after the Stanley Cup was handed out. I don't get why people are on high horses or not fans because they want to talk about the POSSIBILITY of a player being moved. Explain that to me.
Exactly Kovy...and the what if scenarios lead us all to that happy place...what would we do if we were the GM...
i dont know i dont usually call people idiots for anything they believe,
but i cant get over how LUDICROUS this malkin trade rumor is
NOT because its impossible that malkin is going to be traded for any of the given proposals, but rather because it is impossible that it is going to happen this summer...there are 0 trades involving malkin that make any semblance of sense right now
and thats why im shocked by the discussion at hand. its not so much the discussion itself, more the timing of it. 5 years from now, this whole thread becomes more credible as far as i am concerned.

superconan wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:newarenanow wrote:superconan wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Everytime Malkin steps on the ice, you feel a goal is going to happen for the Penguins.
Everytime?
Yeah, I wish I felt that way more during the Finals when Geno was on the ice.
In case you didn't know or notice. The kid was playing with a terrible flu. His one linemate had a broken finger and his other linemate was playing a broken nose. There isn't much a guy can do by himself against an almost inpenetrable Detroit defense. Not saying Crosby had it made, but it was much easier for him to have a healthy Hossa playing alongside him.
Everyone is banged up and hurting by the finals. I thought Crosby had the tougher match-ups anyway.

Rohit wrote:pronovost19 wrote:Kovy27 wrote:duke66 wrote:Kovy27 wrote: I have more hockey intelligence in my left nut than you do in your brain.
...that response leads me to believe u are barely out of high school...but i digress...ok u make a point as well, and i'm willing to acknowledge when people make a point, u know that's what adults do...yes i really have no more right to bash malkin trade rumours/speculation, then u and others have to actually discuss the matter...and let me clear some things up, i don't support malkin over crosby, or vice versa, i support the penguins as a team...
...the whole point i was trying to make, was, it would be foolish IMO for the pens to trade away malkin at this stage in his career...obviously u feel differently about it and that's cool...but sometimes i think people like to post outrageous s*** just so they can come on after the fact and brag if they are right...u may think that's what i may do as well...but i know better...
If 11 years out of high school is barely out...then yeah, I guess so.
The rumor is just that...A RUMOR. It gets more credible when it is delivered from someone inside the hockey world. I heard this rumor right after the Stanley Cup was handed out. I don't get why people are on high horses or not fans because they want to talk about the POSSIBILITY of a player being moved. Explain that to me.
Exactly Kovy...and the what if scenarios lead us all to that happy place...what would we do if we were the GM...
i dont know i dont usually call people idiots for anything they believe,
but i cant get over how LUDICROUS this malkin trade rumor is
NOT because its impossible that malkin is going to be traded for any of the given proposals, but rather because it is impossible that it is going to happen this summer...there are 0 trades involving malkin that make any semblance of sense right now
and thats why im shocked by the discussion at hand. its not so much the discussion itself, more the timing of it. 5 years from now, this whole thread becomes more credible as far as i am concerned.

kirk wrote:superconan wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:newarenanow wrote:superconan wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Everytime Malkin steps on the ice, you feel a goal is going to happen for the Penguins.
Everytime?
Yeah, I wish I felt that way more during the Finals when Geno was on the ice.
In case you didn't know or notice. The kid was playing with a terrible flu. His one linemate had a broken finger and his other linemate was playing a broken nose. There isn't much a guy can do by himself against an almost inpenetrable Detroit defense. Not saying Crosby had it made, but it was much easier for him to have a healthy Hossa playing alongside him.
Everyone is banged up and hurting by the finals. I thought Crosby had the tougher match-ups anyway.
And he had Hossa, which begs the question once again: If Sid is the best player in the world, someone who can make just about any linemate better, then why does he need Hossa where someone like Malkin can be dominant with Malone and Sykora?

kirk wrote:superconan wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:newarenanow wrote:superconan wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Everytime Malkin steps on the ice, you feel a goal is going to happen for the Penguins.
Everytime?
Yeah, I wish I felt that way more during the Finals when Geno was on the ice.
In case you didn't know or notice. The kid was playing with a terrible flu. His one linemate had a broken finger and his other linemate was playing a broken nose. There isn't much a guy can do by himself against an almost inpenetrable Detroit defense. Not saying Crosby had it made, but it was much easier for him to have a healthy Hossa playing alongside him.
Everyone is banged up and hurting by the finals. I thought Crosby had the tougher match-ups anyway.
And he had Hossa, which begs the question once again: If Sid is the best player in the world, someone who can make just about any linemate better, then why does he need Hossa where someone like Malkin can be dominant with Malone and Sykora?

brwi wrote:Pitts wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Not once have I hate on Crosby, he is simply one of the best, but to be completely arrogant and neglectful towards what Malkin did this year is just ridiculous in my opinion. And what I am saying is that what Malkin did this season is jsut a glimpse.
Please tell us, where did anyone neglect what Malkin did this year.
We started a conversation about a "possible" trade scenario involving Malkin and you, in your lust for him, turned it into a p issing contest about who is better -- Crosby or Malkin.
Some of us are trying to have an educated conversation about real trade possibilities.
Huhhhhuhhuuhuhuhuh...you said "educated."
There is a significant herd that believes you only every trade a player because he sucks or is unlikeable. You never trade a "good guy" or a guy with loads of talent no matter what the return. You just don't do it no matter the salary cost or the needs in other areas. If you have 8 great defensemen and they are all super-swell guys and all make 4mil a year or more a year, you have to keep all of them, even if you have no decent forwards or goaltenders on your roster.
Brad
Troy Loney wrote:kirk wrote:Pitts wrote:AlexPKeaton wrote:My point is that Malkin + average wingers is far better than Kopitar and Brown + average winger in terms of production, and a wash in terms of salary.
I think it would be more along the likes of:
Brown/Crosby/Hossa
Malone/Kopitar/Sykora
Winger/Staal/Ruutu
Blah, blah, blah...
And, can Kopitar do for Malone and Sykora even one half of what Geno did? After all, Sid at various times played with those two, and things didn't go so well.
Crosby to Chicago for Toews and Kane.


Users browsing this forum: champeen, janissary782, knives of ice and 19 guests