Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf




npv708 wrote:Really? That's a penalty, but what happened to Cooke in the other end isn't? Que?



sharpshootr55 wrote:Good penalty to take there.


slappybrown wrote:npv708 wrote:Really? That's a penalty, but what happened to Cooke in the other end isn't? Que?
yessssss, npv officiating post
(I agree with you this time)
/s/ obligatory


Gaucho wrote:Adams is my 2nd star this game.

npv708 wrote:I feel like Phoenix has the league in their back pocket. I really feel like the NHL really pulls for the franchise or something.



npv708 wrote:Smith pulled.



NashvilleCat wrote:npv708 wrote:I feel like Phoenix has the league in their back pocket. I really feel like the NHL really pulls for the franchise or something.
You would too if you owned them.


npv708 wrote:One rule I'm really not a fan of, is that goalies are allowed to come back out on the ice after an icing. Every player on the team that ices the puck must come back out, but then the goalie who wasn't on the ice has to come back? It doesn't make sense to me. It would force teams to be more careful with the puck with the ENG

Users browsing this forum: brwi, CERV96, ffemtreed, Great58, roland, Shakes, Staggy, topshelf66 and 46 guests