skullman80 wrote:Thats as much on Sid as it is on Martin.
yes but with that pressure Martin has to get the puck deep instead of trying to make a play
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
skullman80 wrote:Thats as much on Sid as it is on Martin.

skullman80 wrote:Thats as much on Sid as it is on Martin.




Gaucho wrote:Good thing Martin was on the ice, because who could we possibly blame if he wasn't?




columbia wrote:pens#1 wrote:Martin again going deep
He didn't turn over the puck...


Gaucho wrote:Good thing Martin was on the ice, because who could we possibly blame if he wasn't?


Gaucho wrote:Good thing Martin was on the ice, because who could we possibly blame if he wasn't?

columbia wrote:pens#1 wrote:Martin again going deep
He didn't turn over the puck...

Rocco wrote:Gaucho wrote:Good thing Martin was on the ice, because who could we possibly blame if he wasn't?
Martin would get blamed if he were in the press box.

DelPen wrote:Gaucho wrote:Good thing Martin was on the ice, because who could we possibly blame if he wasn't?
I'm blaming the refs.

Gaucho wrote:Good thing Martin was on the ice, because who could we possibly blame if he wasn't?

pens2005 wrote:Did we have 5 forwards on the ice for that sh goal? Flyers announcers said we did.







Users browsing this forum: DelPen, DontToewsMeBro, Idoit40fans, Inkio, It'sagreatdayforhockey!, largegarlic, PenguinSteve-o and 28 guests