Rocco wrote:SolidSnake wrote:Is the mob the new kliq?
It's a subset of the clique.

Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
Rocco wrote:SolidSnake wrote:Is the mob the new kliq?
It's a subset of the clique.


24. As Shero, head coach Dan Bylsma and Pittsburgh's hockey operations department break down the season, here is a stat they must explain. Crosby returned March 15 and, to that point, the Penguins had allowed 2.5 goals per game. Afterwards, it rose to 3.9, including playoffs.

shmenguin wrote:from friedman's 30 thoughts24. As Shero, head coach Dan Bylsma and Pittsburgh's hockey operations department break down the season, here is a stat they must explain. Crosby returned March 15 and, to that point, the Penguins had allowed 2.5 goals per game. Afterwards, it rose to 3.9, including playoffs.
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/opinion ... ughts.html
i knew it was bad, but i didn't know it was that bad. and this doesn't even take into account games like nashville - where we should have let up about 5-6 goals but won 5-2 instead.
obstruction, a few bad bounces, blah blah blah. THIS is why the flyers beat us.


shmenguin wrote:from friedman's 30 thoughts24. As Shero, head coach Dan Bylsma and Pittsburgh's hockey operations department break down the season, here is a stat they must explain. Crosby returned March 15 and, to that point, the Penguins had allowed 2.5 goals per game. Afterwards, it rose to 3.9, including playoffs.
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/opinion ... ughts.html
i knew it was bad, but i didn't know it was that bad. and this doesn't even take into account games like nashville - where we should have let up about 5-6 goals but won 5-2 instead.
obstruction, a few bad bounces, blah blah blah. THIS is why the flyers beat us.
25. One NHL coach doesn't think Crosby is the issue: "They started to believe their press clippings and lost attention to detail."

Henry Hank wrote:The Snapshot wrote:
To keep saying that is silly. The Caps have won NOTHING. You should bury these things in your dissertations so that you keep your rep.
Don't think I'm not noticing all the shots you've been taking at me. If you don't like my posts, I don't really care. But don't take shots at me in every thread because you're butt hurt that I was right about everything I said before the playoffs and you were wrong. That's the only thing I'm going to say to you, ignored, good bye.

DelPen wrote:So the two wins saved Bylsma's job and nothing is going to get fixed. We will see long win streaks of domination and then streaks of incompetance and then we will lose in the first round again to a team we should beat and everyone will be wondering why.

slappybrown wrote:DelPen wrote:So the two wins saved Bylsma's job and nothing is going to get fixed. We will see long win streaks of domination and then streaks of incompetance and then we will lose in the first round again to a team we should beat and everyone will be wondering why.
They could have got swept and I doubt he'd be fired. NHL GMs don't make decisions on the basis of two games, or a single playoff series.

seabiscuit wrote:slappybrown wrote:DelPen wrote:So the two wins saved Bylsma's job and nothing is going to get fixed. We will see long win streaks of domination and then streaks of incompetance and then we will lose in the first round again to a team we should beat and everyone will be wondering why.
They could have got swept and I doubt he'd be fired. NHL GMs don't make decisions on the basis of two games, or a single playoff series.
Or 3 playoff series it turns out.

seabiscuit wrote:slappybrown wrote:DelPen wrote:So the two wins saved Bylsma's job and nothing is going to get fixed. We will see long win streaks of domination and then streaks of incompetance and then we will lose in the first round again to a team we should beat and everyone will be wondering why.
They could have got swept and I doubt he'd be fired. NHL GMs don't make decisions on the basis of two games, or a single playoff series.
Or 3 playoff series it turns out.


SolidSnake wrote:The Pens need to win the President's trophy so they can hang the "regular season champions" banner

slappybrown wrote:SolidSnake wrote:The Pens need to win the President's trophy so they can hang the "regular season champions" banner
Oh hey, remember that time we also won the Stanley Cup after being in the 9 spot when he was hired? No? Oh, ok. This whole Caps like comparison is nonsense. The notion that the team's performance in the regular season is entirely irrelevant is foolish.

slappybrown wrote:seabiscuit wrote:slappybrown wrote:DelPen wrote:So the two wins saved Bylsma's job and nothing is going to get fixed. We will see long win streaks of domination and then streaks of incompetance and then we will lose in the first round again to a team we should beat and everyone will be wondering why.
They could have got swept and I doubt he'd be fired. NHL GMs don't make decisions on the basis of two games, or a single playoff series.
Or 3 playoff series it turns out.
Because those 3 playoff series are his entire body of work.


penmyst wrote:So let me get this straight, for future reference:
A coach suffers three consecutive early exits in the playoffs, in humiliating fashion to inferior teams all 3 times.
And when fans think that guy ought to be let go, they are afflicted by "mob mentality" and can be disregarded because the slur is that mobs don't have a brain.
Correct?

lol what? This year wasn't that bad? 8-4 losses in the playoffs are acceptible to you? The friggin Islanders wouldn't have given up 8 goals any game if they would have played Philly. That is downright embarassing and unacceptible. If you feel this series was close and the better team won... I just don't know what to say. We were blown apart.Rylan wrote:penmyst wrote:So let me get this straight, for future reference:
A coach suffers three consecutive early exits in the playoffs, in humiliating fashion to inferior teams all 3 times.
And when fans think that guy ought to be let go, they are afflicted by "mob mentality" and can be disregarded because the slur is that mobs don't have a brain.
Correct?
lol what? 2 of the 3 were against equal or better teams. Only the Montreal lose is really that bad a lose to me.

Rylan wrote:penmyst wrote:So let me get this straight, for future reference:
A coach suffers three consecutive early exits in the playoffs, in humiliating fashion to inferior teams all 3 times.
And when fans think that guy ought to be let go, they are afflicted by "mob mentality" and can be disregarded because the slur is that mobs don't have a brain.
Correct?
lol what? 2 of the 3 were against equal or better teams. Only the Montreal lose is really that bad a lose to me.

Rylan wrote:penmyst wrote:So let me get this straight, for future reference:
A coach suffers three consecutive early exits in the playoffs, in humiliating fashion to inferior teams all 3 times.
And when fans think that guy ought to be let go, they are afflicted by "mob mentality" and can be disregarded because the slur is that mobs don't have a brain.
Correct?
lol what? 2 of the 3 were against equal or better teams. Only the Montreal lose is really that bad a lose to me.

Rylan wrote:
lol what? 2 of the 3 were against equal or better teams. Only the Montreal lose is really that bad a lose to me.

slappybrown wrote:seabiscuit wrote:slappybrown wrote:DelPen wrote:So the two wins saved Bylsma's job and nothing is going to get fixed. We will see long win streaks of domination and then streaks of incompetance and then we will lose in the first round again to a team we should beat and everyone will be wondering why.
They could have got swept and I doubt he'd be fired. NHL GMs don't make decisions on the basis of two games, or a single playoff series.
Or 3 playoff series it turns out.
Because those 3 playoff series are his entire body of work.

penmyst wrote:Rylan wrote:
lol what? 2 of the 3 were against equal or better teams. Only the Montreal lose is really that bad a lose to me.
I don't know what series YOU were watching this year. But the loss to Philly was about as humiliating as it gets. 2 games, and maybe a total aggregate of 7 periods (out of 18+), were the Pens even competing with the Flyers.


Pens15 wrote:I brought this up before, and it's a pretty crazy idea, but what about Phil Jackson? The guy has a proven track record of working with HOF players and getting the most out of them. Two hands full of rings would command instant respect. I mean sure, he probably doesn't know a ton about hockey, but I'm sure he knows enough. Obviously you would need some good assistants to deal with the hockey type stuff, but the head coach position is more of a CEO type of thing anyway, in business you see guys cross industries all the time. Would be one of the most interesting sports stories ever maybe.

seabiscuit wrote:slappybrown wrote:seabiscuit wrote:slappybrown wrote:DelPen wrote:So the two wins saved Bylsma's job and nothing is going to get fixed. We will see long win streaks of domination and then streaks of incompetance and then we will lose in the first round again to a team we should beat and everyone will be wondering why.
They could have got swept and I doubt he'd be fired. NHL GMs don't make decisions on the basis of two games, or a single playoff series.
Or 3 playoff series it turns out.
Because those 3 playoff series are his entire body of work.
Were you sad to see Recchi go?
