Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf





JoseCuervo wrote:I look at the defense: Martin, Michalek, Letang, Orpik <= these aren't bad players
... but all these players have played defense poorly in the system. I know some posters are clamoring for a shut-down pair, but I don't think they would've helped this year because they never played shut-down hockey.
Last year they had to play some defensive hockey with the stars out and all of these players played well. With everyone healthy this year "the system" showed no defense.

blurryhaze312 wrote:in the playoffs they (players and coaching staff) relied too much on their skill and not enough on hard work.

Why the hell is Engo doing things like leading a rush and jumping up into the offense?


joker10277 wrote:The system they won the cup with is not what their playing now, DB turned the guys loose a little when he took over for MT, but they still played with defensive structure. DB's system that he put in after that is an absolute failure in the post season, played it for 3 years, got bounced every year.



wondermoose wrote:Good players play well regardless of the "system." Somethig has happened to Martin in that he has no redeemable qualities as a defenseman anymore. That's not the systems fault.


JoseCuervo wrote:wondermoose wrote:Good players play well regardless of the "system." Somethig has happened to Martin in that he has no redeemable qualities as a defenseman anymore. That's not the systems fault.
They all seemed to play fine last year when they had to play defense with the top players out. There was no excuse for why all of the defensive players outside of nisky and engo regressed this year. When it happens to 4 players, I'm not singling any of them out. The defense as a whole was bad.


DelPen wrote:They are not playing they way that won them a Stanley Cup. So again, it's either they tuned it out or Bylsma changed and they are doing what he wants.
Either case it's a disgusting product on the ice and it falls back to the coach.

tfrizz wrote:DelPen wrote:They are not playing they way that won them a Stanley Cup. So again, it's either they tuned it out or Bylsma changed and they are doing what he wants.
Either case it's a disgusting product on the ice and it falls back to the coach.
I still believe the biggest reason the Pens won the Cup was because they still had the structure of Therrien's system in place.


canaan wrote:Because of the clutching and grabbing revival in the league?

meow wrote:canaan wrote:Because of the clutching and grabbing revival in the league?
This is a pretty good answer. There isn't enough talent in the league to have the zero-obstruction league everyone wanted out of the lock-out and they are letting some more clutch-and-grab go.




BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:meow wrote:canaan wrote:Because of the clutching and grabbing revival in the league?
This is a pretty good answer. There isn't enough talent in the league to have the zero-obstruction league everyone wanted out of the lock-out and they are letting some more clutch-and-grab go.
Here is the problem....I do agree and disagree to an extent - it has gotten a bit worse. But I also saw Philly put up a billion goals on the Penguins, saw the Islanders do it, saw Ottawa do it and saw other teams like Nashville cycle the puck for hours to the point they should have had a ton of goals.
Clutch or grab or not I think that speaks volumes to either the personnel, the system or both.
I actually think the HCDB and GMRS misfired on how to use their own system with the players they have. They have enough skill already to run the system they need stay at home d-men and not puck movers to round it out, and each line needs a real actual grinder to keep the cycle from going once the puck gets in the zone. Its why Talbot fit so well on the 2nd line the year we won the cup. Its why Eaton, Suderi, Gill, Orpik (younger) where so effective. They were needed to play solid positioning defense and they could excel at it.
I think they screwed up the lineup themselves with 3 smaller puck movers on d, less physical guys on the 2nd line wings, and Kunitz not really being the kunitz of old on the top line (although that is not really their fault). Just my two cents.

Users browsing this forum: janissary782, SoCalPenguin, Tybrus and 30 guests