Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf




pekkasteele wrote:But Martin have a NTC or NMC, and took less to play in Pittsburgh than he was offered in NJ if I remember correctly, so why would he agree on going back there?


Idoit40fans wrote:pekkasteele wrote:But Martin have a NTC or NMC, and took less to play in Pittsburgh than he was offered in NJ if I remember correctly, so why would he agree on going back there?
The chance to play for a winner.

The Current One wrote:I think Volchenkov's deal is one year longer than Martin's. Do it!!!!!

JS© wrote:The Current One wrote:I think Volchenkov's deal is one year longer than Martin's. Do it!!!!!
which makes it an even worse idea. Being stuck with him until he's 33, and he's been on the decline since 2010. And being that he's a shot-blocker, his decline will happen quicker than the average player.
No thanks.

sil wrote:JS© wrote:The Current One wrote:I think Volchenkov's deal is one year longer than Martin's. Do it!!!!!
which makes it an even worse idea. Being stuck with him until he's 33, and he's been on the decline since 2010. And being that he's a shot-blocker, his decline will happen quicker than the average player.
No thanks.
I guess Michalek should've retired sometime last decade then.

Pavel Bure wrote:sil wrote:JS© wrote:The Current One wrote:I think Volchenkov's deal is one year longer than Martin's. Do it!!!!!
which makes it an even worse idea. Being stuck with him until he's 33, and he's been on the decline since 2010. And being that he's a shot-blocker, his decline will happen quicker than the average player.
No thanks.
I guess Michalek should've retired sometime last decade then.
Not even close to the same style past the shot blocking.



Pavel Bure wrote:sil wrote:JS© wrote:The Current One wrote:I think Volchenkov's deal is one year longer than Martin's. Do it!!!!!
which makes it an even worse idea. Being stuck with him until he's 33, and he's been on the decline since 2010. And being that he's a shot-blocker, his decline will happen quicker than the average player.
No thanks.
I guess Michalek should've retired sometime last decade then.
Not even close to the same style past the shot blocking.





SolidSnake wrote:Michalek is the king of getting pasted into the boards


Malkamaniac wrote:I wanted Volchenkov when the Pens had a chance to get him. Now, Paul Martin is here and I think he left of decently bad terms with NJ.



The Current One wrote:Seems Volchenkov has fallen out of favor in New Jersey. We know Martin played well in their system, and I wonder if a straight up trade of Martin for Volchenkov would ever be a possibility? Pens would should a little salary, and get a guy who was known as a tough-as-nails defenseman in Ottawa. If nothing else, getting rid of Martin would be a major plus! I think Volchenkov's deal is one year longer than Martin's. Do it!!!!!

shmenguin wrote:If dealing Martin is a priority for the team because of money, they shouldnt really care what they get back for him. We didn't give anything up to acquire him. It's not necessary to get anything substantive back when giving him away.

shmenguin wrote:i perused the "Martin Signs" thread a few weeks ago. i don't think people were that thrilled about the signing at the time. there were a lot of "that seems like a lot of money" comments.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests