Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

joker10277 wrote:RS is to blame for being in the position he is with Staal. He should have signed him to a 3 or 5 year deal last contract. He would of been an RFA under a 3 year and he would have 2 years left and be very tradeable if he signed him to 5 years. Never understood why he signed him right up to his UFA years, he did the same thing with Letang, so next year he'll be in the same place with Letang.

Defence21 wrote:joker10277 wrote:RS is to blame for being in the position he is with Staal. He should have signed him to a 3 or 5 year deal last contract. He would of been an RFA under a 3 year and he would have 2 years left and be very tradeable if he signed him to 5 years. Never understood why he signed him right up to his UFA years, he did the same thing with Letang, so next year he'll be in the same place with Letang.
Not like Staal and his agent didn't know this. Sometimes a GM's hands are tied, especially when a player is as good as Staal is. These negotiations aren't one-sided...

Defence21 wrote:joker10277 wrote:RS is to blame for being in the position he is with Staal. He should have signed him to a 3 or 5 year deal last contract. He would of been an RFA under a 3 year and he would have 2 years left and be very tradeable if he signed him to 5 years. Never understood why he signed him right up to his UFA years, he did the same thing with Letang, so next year he'll be in the same place with Letang.
Not like Staal and his agent didn't know this. Sometimes a GM's hands are tied, especially when a player is as good as Staal is. These negotiations aren't one-sided...

joker10277 wrote:Defence21 wrote:joker10277 wrote:RS is to blame for being in the position he is with Staal. He should have signed him to a 3 or 5 year deal last contract. He would of been an RFA under a 3 year and he would have 2 years left and be very tradeable if he signed him to 5 years. Never understood why he signed him right up to his UFA years, he did the same thing with Letang, so next year he'll be in the same place with Letang.
Not like Staal and his agent didn't know this. Sometimes a GM's hands are tied, especially when a player is as good as Staal is. These negotiations aren't one-sided...
I understand what your saying, but RS had the advantage at the time, he could of told him we'll do 3 years or 5 years or you can go to July 1st and we'll match the offer or take the picks. RS had alot of leverage 3 years ago.


joker10277 wrote:Defence21 wrote:joker10277 wrote:RS is to blame for being in the position he is with Staal. He should have signed him to a 3 or 5 year deal last contract. He would of been an RFA under a 3 year and he would have 2 years left and be very tradeable if he signed him to 5 years. Never understood why he signed him right up to his UFA years, he did the same thing with Letang, so next year he'll be in the same place with Letang.
Not like Staal and his agent didn't know this. Sometimes a GM's hands are tied, especially when a player is as good as Staal is. These negotiations aren't one-sided...
I understand what your saying, but RS had the advantage at the time, he could of told him we'll do 3 years or 5 years or you can go to July 1st and we'll match the offer or take the picks. RS had alot of leverage 3 years ago.


If the cap goes way up — some see $70 million as possible, a 10 percent increase — the Penguins keeping all three centers suddenly becomes palatable.
Why make a move like this without surveying the revised landscape?


Troy Loney wrote:How much of a raise does Jordan Staal get? $5.5M per year seems about right to me.







Pavel Bure wrote:Yah let's move. Two time scoring champ that dominates at the center position to accommodate Jordan Staal. No way


Sarcastic wrote:I have a feeling that Staal wold be disappointing if he went to a team to be #1 or heavily counted on #2. He gets points on the Pens, but remember he is not a playmaker at all and also he usually plays against weaker competition than do Crosby and Malkin.



Bioshock wrote:Sarcastic wrote:I have a feeling that Staal wold be disappointing if he went to a team to be #1 or heavily counted on #2. He gets points on the Pens, but remember he is not a playmaker at all and also he usually plays against weaker competition than do Crosby and Malkin.
I can come back at that with the fact that he has never had a good supporting cast. Yeah, he hasn't gone against top D-Pairings, but so what? He hasn't had a better winger than Matt Cooke or Tyler frigging Kennedy. The dude has a ton of talent. If he was on the leafs top line of Kessel and Lupul, it would be epic.

Sarcastic wrote:I have a feeling that Staal wold be disappointing if he went to a team to be #1 or heavily counted on #2. He gets points on the Pens, but remember he is not a playmaker at all and also he usually plays against weaker competition than do Crosby and Malkin.

Pens15 wrote:Sarcastic wrote:I have a feeling that Staal wold be disappointing if he went to a team to be #1 or heavily counted on #2. He gets points on the Pens, but remember he is not a playmaker at all and also he usually plays against weaker competition than do Crosby and Malkin.
If they want an Art Ross contender they'll be disappointed, but if they'll settle for solid production, special teams, a rock solid team/character guy, and a great playoff performer who can be a major piece to a Cup winning team, they should be very satisfied.

Users browsing this forum: Dutchpensfan and 11 guests