Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf


czwalga wrote:Staal wouldnt lead the pens in playoff goals if he was in the role of Malkin and Crosby. He was supposed to be a shutdown center in which he's regressed in that area this year.
I'd be ok with trading him or not trading him.





Desiato wrote:Martin still demonstrates great fundamental skills.




Sarcastic wrote:Desiato wrote:Martin still demonstrates great fundamental skills.
Not offensively. And he can't play physical defense. So, yeah, the first pass and an occasional poke check.


MRandall25 wrote:Do you guys remember how good Martin was on the Devils? It's pretty much the reason we gave him $5 mil and the reason he made the US Olympic team.

JoseCuervo wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Do you guys remember how good Martin was on the Devils? It's pretty much the reason we gave him $5 mil and the reason he made the US Olympic team.
Do you guys remember how good Michalek was on the Coyotes? It's pretty much the reason we gave him $4 mil and the reason he made the Czech Olympic team.Spoiler:

MRandall25 wrote:Do you guys remember how good Martin was on the Devils?


shmenguin wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Do you guys remember how good Martin was on the Devils?
nope

BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:shmenguin wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Do you guys remember how good Martin was on the Devils?
nope
Martin was actually really good on the Devils. Very good positionally and a very solid puck mover. All of our defense is worse than 2 years ago except Matt N.

shmenguin wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Do you guys remember how good Martin was on the Devils?
nope



shmenguin wrote:people are generally too hard on martin. it's not worth singling him out for being terrible in the playoffs. practically the whole team was utterly lost. but generally, he's one of those defensemen whose merits require explanation from hockey geeks (that's a complimentary term). in a vacuum, that's fine. there's value in a player like that. but it's not good enough when you factor in his salary by itself and how it relates to the cap and the salary/quality of his replacements.
on this team, he needs to be a standout player if he's making that kind of money.

JoseCuervo wrote:shmenguin wrote:people are generally too hard on martin. it's not worth singling him out for being terrible in the playoffs. practically the whole team was utterly lost. but generally, he's one of those defensemen whose merits require explanation from hockey geeks (that's a complimentary term). in a vacuum, that's fine. there's value in a player like that. but it's not good enough when you factor in his salary by itself and how it relates to the cap and the salary/quality of his replacements.
on this team, he needs to be a standout player if he's making that kind of money.
Only people who understand hockey know how good martin is?
Yea, sounds about right.

shmenguin wrote:people are generally too hard on martin. it's not worth singling him out for being terrible in the playoffs. practically the whole team was utterly lost. but generally, he's one of those defensemen whose merits require explanation from hockey geeks (that's a complimentary term). in a vacuum, that's fine. there's value in a player like that. but it's not good enough when you factor in his salary by itself and how it relates to the cap and the salary/quality of his replacements.
on this team, he needs to be a standout player if he's making that kind of money.

Users browsing this forum: midd and 4 guests