Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf



steelhammer wrote:Ryan Whitney:
Drafted - 2002
College - 3 years
Pro - 5 years
Traded in 2009, 7 years after being drafted
Alex Goligoski:
Drafted - 2004
College - 3 years
Pro - 4 years
Traded in 2011, 7 years after being drafted

steelhammer wrote:Ryan Whitney:
Drafted - 2002
College - 3 years
Pro - 5 years
Traded in 2009, 7 years after being drafted
Alex Goligoski:
Drafted - 2004
College - 3 years
Pro - 4 years
Traded in 2011, 7 years after being drafted

bhaw wrote:steelhammer wrote:Ryan Whitney:
Drafted - 2002
College - 3 years
Pro - 5 years
Traded in 2009, 7 years after being drafted
Alex Goligoski:
Drafted - 2004
College - 3 years
Pro - 4 years
Traded in 2011, 7 years after being drafted
I believe in the term "pick your battles."
Picking examples where we gained a forward who undoubtedly helped us win the Cup and another where we got a top 5 goal scorer plus a solid 5/6 D man are probably not the best examples to choose.

steelhammer wrote:bhaw wrote:steelhammer wrote:Ryan Whitney:
Drafted - 2002
College - 3 years
Pro - 5 years
Traded in 2009, 7 years after being drafted
Alex Goligoski:
Drafted - 2004
College - 3 years
Pro - 4 years
Traded in 2011, 7 years after being drafted
I believe in the term "pick your battles."
Picking examples where we gained a forward who undoubtedly helped us win the Cup and another where we got a top 5 goal scorer plus a solid 5/6 D man are probably not the best examples to choose.
So when Crosby in his 30's one of these D-men will finally be developed to trade for a scoring winger? Great long-term strategy.


bhaw wrote:steelhammer wrote:bhaw wrote:steelhammer wrote:Ryan Whitney:
Drafted - 2002
College - 3 years
Pro - 5 years
Traded in 2009, 7 years after being drafted
Alex Goligoski:
Drafted - 2004
College - 3 years
Pro - 4 years
Traded in 2011, 7 years after being drafted
I believe in the term "pick your battles."
Picking examples where we gained a forward who undoubtedly helped us win the Cup and another where we got a top 5 goal scorer plus a solid 5/6 D man are probably not the best examples to choose.
So when Crosby in his 30's one of these D-men will finally be developed to trade for a scoring winger? Great long-term strategy.
One of the guys drafted this year? Sure. You aren't familiar with the term "pipeline," are you?

bhaw wrote:Again, how do you take any joy in this team? All you do is complain about everyone and everything this team is about... what a miserable existence.

steelhammer wrote:Yes, it involves having players on your team with NHL experience who would actually fetch a good return. What did we just get for Michalek? Probably about the same we would get for any other d-man except for Letang? Our only pipleline would be to trade one of the best d-men in hockey in Letang. No thanks.

steelhammer wrote:bhaw wrote:Again, how do you take any joy in this team? All you do is complain about everyone and everything this team is about... what a miserable existence.
And all you do is follow me around on me and quote my posts. What does that say about you?

Rylan wrote::pop:

bhaw wrote:steelhammer wrote:bhaw wrote:Again, how do you take any joy in this team? All you do is complain about everyone and everything this team is about... what a miserable existence.
And all you do is follow me around on me and quote my posts. What does that say about you?
Last time I quoted you was how long ago? All you can do is relive the past (distant past). What does that say about you where I am the highlight of your year.


steelhammer wrote:bhaw wrote:steelhammer wrote:bhaw wrote:Again, how do you take any joy in this team? All you do is complain about everyone and everything this team is about... what a miserable existence.
And all you do is follow me around on me and quote my posts. What does that say about you?
Last time I quoted you was how long ago? All you can do is relive the past (distant past). What does that say about you where I am the highlight of your year.
I don't know and don't care. Goodnight.


Gaucho wrote:The strategy makes a lot of sense, as the recent years suggest that defensemen make better assets than forwards. Are the people complaining about RS drafting too many dmen the same people that whine about overpaying for Z and PM?


Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:If Shero ever was on Wheel of Fortune, he probably wouldn't do very well since he'd only select D.





Troy Loney wrote:Seriously though, I have no problem with the drafting strategy. Just based on Shero's first round draft record, (not including Jordan Staal which was basically a sure thing) he's drafted two forwards, one complete bust and one project. Both defenseman drafted are almost guaranteed to be regular NHLer's and likely to be impact players at that. So basically unless your in the very top of the draft, there is a good chance of bust with the forward guys, and these defenseman he's getting are guaranteed to be assets for the franchise.

Users browsing this forum: CERV96, jwnorsk, KG, midd and 21 guests