Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf






Gaucho wrote:I'm a little befuddled, tbh. I think Morozov got the ice time he deserved. It's a bit of a stretch to blame our prospect development. Morozov played on a line with Jagr and Francis in his rookie season and later got the opportunity to be Mario's wing. He failed miserably. In any case, since this draft is about accomplishments and not potential there is no way you can convince me that Morozov is a good value pick.
I feel I need to apologize to Rylan for this rant. No offense, bro.
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette - Oct. 21, 2000 wrote:After three seasons of underachieving, Aleksey Morozov finally seemed primed to make a move toward stardom, or at least toward contributing consistently.
The Penguins' right winger added some much-needed muscle over the summer, then dominated the pre-season by tallying three goals and six assists in seven games to lead the club in scoring. The Penguins' first-round draft choice in 1995, Morozov was widely hailed as the best hockey player not in the NHL until he arrived in Pittsburgh in 1997. Since then, however, he hasn't done better than 31 points in a season.
That appeared ready to change. Morozov, 23, absolutely sparkled in the exhibition campaign. He used his new-found strength to win battles along the boards. He skated with a confidence he had never before displayed. He made plays with passion instead of handling the puck like it was a hand grenade.
But Morozov has done nothing since the regular season started.
Sadly, it's not the young Russian's fault.
In an inexplicable coaching maneuver, bench boss Ivan Hlinka chose to break Morozov's momentum by not playing him for even one shift in the team's opener and has used him as a fourth-liner since. Morozov has zero points. His confidence seems shot.

Rylan wrote:How many 2 time 50 pt getters are still available though?
He was hardly ever in the penalty box.
The man could play hockey when he was given the opportunity to play hockey. He was held back by the Pens and he still had 2 50 pt seasons in an era where scoring was down.




mikey287 wrote:Big disappointment sure, certainly. I think there's a little debate to be had about why is all...
And at this "level" of play, his career value lends him to be a fourth liner and perhaps power play specialist maybe...maybe if some work was done on Morozov's power play production/minute or whatever, there could be a case made, I'm not sure. I hate to be a bean counter here, but the guy played almost 500 games for the Penguins, if you can believe it, I can't fathom not drafting him...
13th in GP among forwards, only ~40th in points per game, but that's not adjusted (he played in the DPE exclusively) and played in the bottom six a hell of a lot more than the top...without adjusting for era and without adjusting for linemates, Morozov belongs in this draft somewhere certainly...

mikey287 wrote:Big disappointment sure, certainly. I think there's a little debate to be had about why is all...
And at this "level" of play, his career value lends him to be a fourth liner and perhaps power play specialist maybe...maybe if some work was done on Morozov's power play production/minute or whatever, there could be a case made, I'm not sure. I hate to be a bean counter here, but the guy played almost 500 games for the Penguins, if you can believe it, I can't fathom not drafting him...
13th in GP among forwards, only ~40th in points per game, but that's not adjusted (he played in the DPE exclusively) and played in the bottom six a hell of a lot more than the top...without adjusting for era and without adjusting for linemates, Morozov belongs in this draft somewhere certainly...


Gaucho wrote:Yeah, I was wrong about Morozov playing with Jagr and Francis. Iirc it was Barnes for most of the year.







BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:mikey287 wrote:Big disappointment sure, certainly. I think there's a little debate to be had about why is all...
And at this "level" of play, his career value lends him to be a fourth liner and perhaps power play specialist maybe...maybe if some work was done on Morozov's power play production/minute or whatever, there could be a case made, I'm not sure. I hate to be a bean counter here, but the guy played almost 500 games for the Penguins, if you can believe it, I can't fathom not drafting him...
13th in GP among forwards, only ~40th in points per game, but that's not adjusted (he played in the DPE exclusively) and played in the bottom six a hell of a lot more than the top...without adjusting for era and without adjusting for linemates, Morozov belongs in this draft somewhere certainly...
This thread has been interesting to say the least - fun read. Kudos to those involved.
BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:Re: Morozov
Not sure of the level of the reasoning behind him not reaching his potential but it was constantly strange to say the least how he was used.
BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:He was briefly put on Jagrs wing at some point but he was a much better RW (and by briefly I mean a handful of games). He was out of place, the coaches never seemed to like him because he wasnt a banger, which was ironic because he played on lines and in roles that required grit. Not everyone has that role, which is why teams put together actual teams, not individual talent.
BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:AM started to briefly fit in as a 2nd line RW in 98 and then the Pens traded for AK27. Once that trade was made he started playing in a 3rd line role with the likes of our mediocre 3rd line centers for the late 90's and early 2000's. The coaches also liked how Rob Brown played the low post on the 2nd PP unit therefore cutting about every positive attribute of his game out of his playing time?
In 2002 or 03 the league went on a non clutch and grab tear to start the season. Morozov played with Mario for the beginning of that season and believe it or not was among the league leaders through about 20 games, but got hurt (and then the league drifted back into a clutch nightmare). I understand he was playing with Mario - but not many players were able to be a point per game during those times and he was - even if just for a 1/4 of a season.
BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:The lack of the team putting him a role he could succeed in (3rd - 4th line type duties in the playoffs, him failing and it seemed always being benched) were a huge issue with me over the years. I think people expected him to be a 90 - 100 point guy. What he was in my mind (if played in the right role), a very good 2nd line RW with PP depth potential. I think if played right he was a 60 point guy. Nothing wrong with that.
BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:Again, maybe he never would have 100% panned out, but I dont think playing mostly on a line with (ill give these 2 names after your draft) as his center was very fair either.
BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:Either way in the 3 years he was used somewhat in his role he had:
49 points in 72 games
25 points in 27 games
50 points in 75 games
For the sake of comparison, since these guys have been drafted or are not eligible (as far as I can tell) for your draft, and how decent his final season here was - following are the Pens top scorers from that season, he got some solid top pairing playing time and performed well, even with poor line mates, not saying its a given, but I imagine he would have been a decent player in the correct role based on his final 3 seasons with us.
32 Dick Tarnstrom 1975-01-20 28 D 80 16 36 52 38 -37 -- -- -- -- --
95 Alexei Morozov 1977-02-16 26 R 75 16 34 50 24 -24 -- -- -- -- --
12 Ryan Malone 1979-12-01 23 F 81 22 21 43 64 -23 -- -- -- -- --
14 Milan Kraft 1980-01-17 23 C 66 19 21 40 18 -22 -- -- -- -- --
9 Rico Fata 1980-02-12 23 R 73 16 18 34 54 -46 -- -- -- -- --
71 Konstantin Koltsov 1981-04-17 22 R 82 9 20 29 30 -30 -- -- -- -- --
55 Richard Jackman 1978-06-28 25 D 25 7 17 24 14
Just for fun (I realize this is not scientific). But if you take his last 3 years here which is not that small of a sample size, and his points per game during that time frame - and match it up against the number of games played, he would easily be a top 20 player statistically. I dont think its unrealistic to say he wasnt used correctly.





Thank you for being respectful of the draft, but I'm willing to sacrifice that rule for more meaningful, deeper discussion. So, feel free to divulge names in this context. The Penguins weren't exactly brimming with depth, even going back to the '96 team that lost to Florida. In fact, Lemieux and Jagr got stuffed by Svehla and Laus (?) and Francis got hurt, their lack of depth showed quite obviously...they might have had a worse team depth-wise than the expansion Panthers even...it didn't really seem to change that much for the rest of the decade either...






Users browsing this forum: Fast B and 3 guests