Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf


sil wrote:columbia wrote:To be fair, this goes back to that "idea" a few weeks ago trading Despres for Seto (which was obviously never going to happen).
Yeah...I would definitely NOT be up for that.

mikey287 wrote:I'd do Dustin Jeffrey and a conditional 3rd for Pierre-Marc Bouchard. Wild fans wouldn't be too unhappy with that return either, as they are just having trouble using him,. Bouchard plays the right wing well and can play the point on the power play.


shmenguin wrote:So Bouchard is basically another Sullivan?
Considering the state of things, that's fine I guess


scals37 wrote:looking at Setoguchi's stats, he's had some incredibly similar numbers to James Neal's pre-penguin production.. That also includes hits and shots..
I know this has been talked about before, and I'm not going to pretend like I've seen him play very often, but why are people writing the idea off and calling him an "empty sweater?" Cap hit is low, isn't desired in MIN anymore, contract is up after next year... just doesn't seem like a bad choice (on paper)

MRandall25 wrote:scals37 wrote:looking at Setoguchi's stats, he's had some incredibly similar numbers to James Neal's pre-penguin production.. That also includes hits and shots..
I know this has been talked about before, and I'm not going to pretend like I've seen him play very often, but why are people writing the idea off and calling him an "empty sweater?" Cap hit is low, isn't desired in MIN anymore, contract is up after next year... just doesn't seem like a bad choice (on paper)
Because he had 1 good year like 6 years ago means he's worth it now?

mikey287 wrote:I'd do Dustin Jeffrey and a conditional 3rd for Pierre-Marc Bouchard. Wild fans wouldn't be too unhappy with that return either, as they are just having trouble using him,. Bouchard plays the right wing well and can play the point on the power play.

scals37 wrote:MRandall25 wrote:scals37 wrote:looking at Setoguchi's stats, he's had some incredibly similar numbers to James Neal's pre-penguin production.. That also includes hits and shots..
I know this has been talked about before, and I'm not going to pretend like I've seen him play very often, but why are people writing the idea off and calling him an "empty sweater?" Cap hit is low, isn't desired in MIN anymore, contract is up after next year... just doesn't seem like a bad choice (on paper)
Because he had 1 good year like 6 years ago means he's worth it now?
His 30 goal season was 4 seasons ago, and has been a 20 goal scorer since then, including last year on a defensive oriented MIN team....
He can skate, he hits, he scores, and he's cap-friendly

scals37 wrote:MRandall25 wrote:scals37 wrote:looking at Setoguchi's stats, he's had some incredibly similar numbers to James Neal's pre-penguin production.. That also includes hits and shots..
I know this has been talked about before, and I'm not going to pretend like I've seen him play very often, but why are people writing the idea off and calling him an "empty sweater?" Cap hit is low, isn't desired in MIN anymore, contract is up after next year... just doesn't seem like a bad choice (on paper)
Because he had 1 good year like 6 years ago means he's worth it now?
His 30 goal season was 4 seasons ago, and has been a 20 goal scorer since then, including last year on a defensive oriented MIN team....
He can skate, he hits, he scores, and he's cap-friendly


Defence21 wrote:scals37 wrote:MRandall25 wrote:scals37 wrote:looking at Setoguchi's stats, he's had some incredibly similar numbers to James Neal's pre-penguin production.. That also includes hits and shots..
I know this has been talked about before, and I'm not going to pretend like I've seen him play very often, but why are people writing the idea off and calling him an "empty sweater?" Cap hit is low, isn't desired in MIN anymore, contract is up after next year... just doesn't seem like a bad choice (on paper)
Because he had 1 good year like 6 years ago means he's worth it now?
His 30 goal season was 4 seasons ago, and has been a 20 goal scorer since then, including last year on a defensive oriented MIN team....
He can skate, he hits, he scores, and he's cap-friendly
From what I've heard, he lacks motivation and goes decent stretches without producing points. Like you, I can't claim to have watched him closely enough to give a first-hand assessment, but from what I've heard, he's just not in the mold of what this team needs.
Plus, his stats may be similar to Neal's pre-Penguin stats, but he's also two years older than Neal now, and four years older than Neal was when he arrived in Pittsburgh. At 26, he may still have that upside in him, but odds are he's a "what you see is what you get" kind of guy.

scals37 wrote:Defence21 wrote:scals37 wrote:MRandall25 wrote:scals37 wrote:looking at Setoguchi's stats, he's had some incredibly similar numbers to James Neal's pre-penguin production.. That also includes hits and shots..
I know this has been talked about before, and I'm not going to pretend like I've seen him play very often, but why are people writing the idea off and calling him an "empty sweater?" Cap hit is low, isn't desired in MIN anymore, contract is up after next year... just doesn't seem like a bad choice (on paper)
Because he had 1 good year like 6 years ago means he's worth it now?
His 30 goal season was 4 seasons ago, and has been a 20 goal scorer since then, including last year on a defensive oriented MIN team....
He can skate, he hits, he scores, and he's cap-friendly
From what I've heard, he lacks motivation and goes decent stretches without producing points. Like you, I can't claim to have watched him closely enough to give a first-hand assessment, but from what I've heard, he's just not in the mold of what this team needs.
Plus, his stats may be similar to Neal's pre-Penguin stats, but he's also two years older than Neal now, and four years older than Neal was when he arrived in Pittsburgh. At 26, he may still have that upside in him, but odds are he's a "what you see is what you get" kind of guy.
according to yahoo sports, they were born in the same year (1987) and drafted in the same year (2005)

scals37 wrote:Defence21 wrote:scals37 wrote:MRandall25 wrote:scals37 wrote:looking at Setoguchi's stats, he's had some incredibly similar numbers to James Neal's pre-penguin production.. That also includes hits and shots..
I know this has been talked about before, and I'm not going to pretend like I've seen him play very often, but why are people writing the idea off and calling him an "empty sweater?" Cap hit is low, isn't desired in MIN anymore, contract is up after next year... just doesn't seem like a bad choice (on paper)
Because he had 1 good year like 6 years ago means he's worth it now?
His 30 goal season was 4 seasons ago, and has been a 20 goal scorer since then, including last year on a defensive oriented MIN team....
He can skate, he hits, he scores, and he's cap-friendly
From what I've heard, he lacks motivation and goes decent stretches without producing points. Like you, I can't claim to have watched him closely enough to give a first-hand assessment, but from what I've heard, he's just not in the mold of what this team needs.
Plus, his stats may be similar to Neal's pre-Penguin stats, but he's also two years older than Neal now, and four years older than Neal was when he arrived in Pittsburgh. At 26, he may still have that upside in him, but odds are he's a "what you see is what you get" kind of guy.
according to yahoo sports, they were born in the same year (1987) and drafted in the same year (2005)

Defence21 wrote:scals37 wrote:Defence21 wrote:scals37 wrote:MRandall25 wrote:
Because he had 1 good year like 6 years ago means he's worth it now?
His 30 goal season was 4 seasons ago, and has been a 20 goal scorer since then, including last year on a defensive oriented MIN team....
He can skate, he hits, he scores, and he's cap-friendly
From what I've heard, he lacks motivation and goes decent stretches without producing points. Like you, I can't claim to have watched him closely enough to give a first-hand assessment, but from what I've heard, he's just not in the mold of what this team needs.
Plus, his stats may be similar to Neal's pre-Penguin stats, but he's also two years older than Neal now, and four years older than Neal was when he arrived in Pittsburgh. At 26, he may still have that upside in him, but odds are he's a "what you see is what you get" kind of guy.
according to yahoo sports, they were born in the same year (1987) and drafted in the same year (2005)
I was thinking Neal is 24. Maybe I'm wrong there. Regardless, Neal has been here for almost two years now, so comparing Seto's non-Pens stats to Neal's pre-Pens stats isn't parallel. If Seto was two years younger than Neal (which would put him at the age Neal was when the Pens acquired him), then that might be a valid argument.

scals37 wrote:Of course, but my original point wasn't saying that Seto would become another James Neal.. It's a no-brainer how good JN is and I think it'd be outlandish to expect the pens to hold off to find another 40 goal scorer
My point was that they've had similar production in the past, and Seto has fallen out of favor like Neal had.. He's a realistic trade option and could benefit from a change of scenery on a much more offensive-minded team


Defence21 wrote:scals37 wrote:Of course, but my original point wasn't saying that Seto would become another James Neal.. It's a no-brainer how good JN is and I think it'd be outlandish to expect the pens to hold off to find another 40 goal scorer
My point was that they've had similar production in the past, and Seto has fallen out of favor like Neal had.. He's a realistic trade option and could benefit from a change of scenery on a much more offensive-minded team
I'm just failing at this conversation left and right -- so I think I'll put an end to it and say this: I'm not a huge fan of Seto based on stats and from the assessments I've heard from those I trust who have watched him first-hand. That said, he makes just $3 million and has another year left on his contract. If he could be had for a reasonable trade -- say TK or Jeffrey and a pick, I wouldn't be totally against it. If we get into discussing any prospects or high picks, I want nothing to do with him.



Luckybreak wrote:Bouchard would be cheaper to acquire but I'd prefer Seto. The physicallity would be nice come playoffs and Bennett seems to be a capable set up guy. A Sharks fan told me he never heard Seto described as an 'empty sweater' and was sad to see him go. Perhaps MIN not a good fit for him?
Setoguchi-Crosby-Bennett
Kunitz-Malkin-Neal
Cooke-Sutter-Dupuis
Glass-Vitale-Adams

scals37 wrote:Luckybreak wrote:Bouchard would be cheaper to acquire but I'd prefer Seto. The physicallity would be nice come playoffs and Bennett seems to be a capable set up guy. A Sharks fan told me he never heard Seto described as an 'empty sweater' and was sad to see him go. Perhaps MIN not a good fit for him?
Setoguchi-Crosby-Bennett
Kunitz-Malkin-Neal
Cooke-Sutter-Dupuis
Glass-Vitale-Adams
I'd be SHOCKED to see Sid click long-term with two brand new wingers thise season given his past trials.. but I have high hopes for Bennett and of course see Seto as a pretty reasonable experiment

mikey287 wrote:I'd do Dustin Jeffrey and a conditional 3rd for Pierre-Marc Bouchard. Wild fans wouldn't be too unhappy with that return either, as they are just having trouble using him,. Bouchard plays the right wing well and can play the point on the power play.

Users browsing this forum: lemieuxReturns, llipgh2, marek, pcm, Pens Fan Since 1970, Pitts and 25 guests