
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf


DelPen wrote: He just might not be the right coach for this roster right now and part of that is on Shero to know what type of players his coach needs to be successful. Somehow I don't think Byslam has the roster he wants. If he does, we'll yikes.

stonewizard51 wrote:Malkamaniac wrote:If Brooks is the toughest stay at home defenseman you have in the playoffs on your roster, playoffs aren't going to matter much.
True.. I'd add neither is a game plan manufactured to play hard for one period and back off the other two.




brwi wrote:The 2 wins the Pens played very much like a MT system team that was a little more passive than aggressive, a little more protective of the puck, and stuck pretty consistently to the 1-2-2.
The 2 losses the Pens looked out of control, turning the puck over all the ice and especially in areas where turnovers are killers, attempting way too many cross-ice long passes on d-zone breakouts, and just looking undisciplined in general.
4 games....whether it's a strike-shortened season or not, it's a little early to panic. Pens have been inconsistent but besides the Black Hawks, I'm seeing a lot of other teams trying to get some consistency themselves because it's been 4 GAMES at this point with really no practice or anything else.

Bowser wrote:The breakouts are a huge problem... but the defense, my goodness are they soft.
Hits through 4 games
Orpik -9
Despres, Engelland, Niskanen – 3
Letang, Lovejoy – 2
Martin – 1





Bowser wrote:pens_CT
Of course, you don't big hit numbers but the physical play by the defense has been non-existent. It isn't the reason this team is losing, that's purely on Bylsma's stupid philosophy on the breakouts but it is a little concerning that Orpik and Letang do not have higher numbers.

iceolater wrote:Looking at the stats...Geno and Neal are the top goal scores but also own the worst plus/minus on this team. Is that because of our D not getting the job done on the back end? Which D is usually paired with that line when on the ice? Just a thought as to why they are a total of -7 in only 4 games.

DelPen wrote:Malkamaniac wrote:If Brooks is the toughest stay at home defenseman you have in the playoffs on your roster, playoffs aren't going to matter much.
Matt Carle would look really good on this team right now which is something I wish I never had to write


mikey287 wrote:Ignoring systems and circumstance for a moment: I don't feel like Bylsma has good control over the team. If the players want to do something, they seem to be able to do it. Early in that Winnipeg game, they actually seemed to be playing pretty good hockey behind the red line, forwards were coming in deeper, they were playing pretty well...and as the game went on, it seemed to get looser and looser...I just wonder how much time Bylsma gets out of his pre-game speech...some coaches get 60 minutes of what they want, I wonder if Bylsma gets even 15? He lost control during the Flyers series, he lost control late last regular season it seems, and I questioned whether he could regain control over the team and I'm not sure that I've seen that quite yet. Assuming of course, they aren't playing the way he wants them to play...

iceolater wrote:Looking at the stats...Geno and Neal are the top goal scores but also own the worst plus/minus on this team. Is that because of our D not getting the job done on the back end? Which D is usually paired with that line when on the ice? Just a thought as to why they are a total of -7 in only 4 games.

iceolater wrote:I would give DB some more time but I am sorry to say, "Letang, Tangradi (the experiment is over) should be used as trade bait to get another winger. Letang I feel is too worried about being on offense that his defense is lacking. Also only 1 or 2 concussions away from lights out. The styel he plays, it is bound to happen. Also, the fact he is a FA and will be demanding $$$$ is he truly worth it? I would pull up Joe Morrow, and another stay at home defensemen. We could get Perry, Getzlaf maybe even Jeff Carter if the price is right. Carter I would love to see in a Pens uniform since he is familar with this division and would be great for Sids line. I am nor never was sold on Dupois being a solid winger for Crosby. Geno has one in Neal now it is time to get one for Sid. Inginla is past his prime so I would get a young talent for the value of a Letang /Tangradi/Pick package or Despres package. Also, Matt Cooke needs to go too. I feel the thugness starting to resurface a bit and feel that before the year is all said and done, he will cost us a game. Just a matter of time. Anyway, just my thoughts but time to cut the ties with some of the popular Pens and regroup the troops.

The U wrote:I realize this is partially in jest. But Shero deserves some blame as well for the past 3 years of postseason failures. And this year, look at our holes....yet look how much cap room and assets we have to trade. Lots of pressure on him to improve the team this yr.

Lt. Dish wrote:it seems to me that there's more reliance on name recognition (Carter? Perry? Getzlaf? Again, Carter?) than a reasoned consideration of how those guys play and how they would actually address what we need.




Users browsing this forum: freddyftbll, iWonTheCup87 and 28 guests