Roster Deficiencies?

Forum for Pittsburgh Penguins-related messages.

Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

Re: Roster Deficiencies?

Postby shmenguin on Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:52 am

DelPen wrote:Niskanen has been better in the top 4 than Michalek has been. Small sample but top 4 isn't an issue. Arguing about the bottom 2 is mostly silly. It would be nice to have an upgrade but the defense is not the problem on this team. Letang has had the most mistakes and the only bad goal due to defense was the Jets goal where Engelled didn't get a stick on a pass to the crease and Lovejoy just stood there. But everything else, especially with Despres, he recovered but it was lazy plays by the forwards not back checking. Bylsma needs to play them more, the choice to keep Despres is bewildering if he's not seeing more than 10 minutes a game.

The 3rd line will be fine if Sutter has Cooke and Kennedy with him like Staal had. And Staal being on the roster now too wouldn't have prevented what happened vs the Leafs and Jets.

And I'm also not convinced Sullivan would be helping things either right now but he would be better than Tangradi, Kennedy or Jeffrey in too 6.

The problem breaks down to forcing Tangradi into the lineup and moving all the lines around. It had to be tried but even in the first two games he was moved around because he can't hack top 6 minutes which means line shifting in the 2nd and 3rd. We saw that take its toll finally vs the Leafs and the Jets game was a mess except for a PP goal and a Crosby breakaway from the drop of the puck.

Thought Tangradi could be effective on the 4th line but not with Adams out there too, no speed at all. And Adams is a much better player so Tangradi has n place on this team now.

Give Jeffrey a shot and see if he can click in the top 6. Then look to Bennett. If that fails look outside.

But they look the same as they did vs Philly last year. Same stupid mistakes and disorganized play. Until they stop being morons on the ice no one can say if this roster is better or worse than last year with certainty.

Staal might have helped getting a shot on goal in the first 10 minutes of the 3rd. In addition to the dumb mistakes, we also didn't do squat offensively as the game went on. He's simply better than Sutter. That gap makes a difference, IMO. And niskanen looks better than Z. But Z is much better than our 5-6 guys. Nice of shero to send him home where he wanted to be, but he'd be pretty useful right now on this team. And Sullivan's presence would end all this wing discussion pretty quick.
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 25,067
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:34 pm

Re: Roster Deficiencies?

Postby Fire0nice228 on Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:53 am

Guinness wrote: there wasn't much value to be had in last summer's FA group.

If Shero makes a move, it will be from his position of strength - defenseman prospects.

Thats the truth. And its not great this year, especially after you remove guys who are highly likely to re-sign on their current team. No, if the Pens want a wing its gonna have to be a trade I think
Posts: 4,002
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:10 pm
Location: refs fault

Re: Roster Deficiencies?

Postby Nizzy on Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:08 pm

Roster isn't the problem. A deadline top 4 physical defenseman? Sure, okay.

1. Fire Bylsma, then you'll have this same roster, playing like a completely different roster, in a better system.
Posts: 2,638
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Steel City

Re: Roster Deficiencies?

Postby Steve Dave on Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:11 pm

Blysma definitely needs to tweak his system. A rugged top 4 D would go along way helping the teams's defensive deficiencies. Also, would love to see Kennedy on Crosby's line...

Kunitz Crosby Kennedy
Cooke Malkin Neal
Glass Sutter Dupuis
Tangradi Vitale Adams/Jeffrey
Steve Dave
Posts: 2,690
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 12:09 pm


Return to Pittsburgh Penguins

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dr Rosenrosen, largegarlic, longtimefan and 36 guests