Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf






Nizzy wrote:mikey287 had a really good post about him why this might be a bad idea. He said Setoguchi can get too comfortable. He might go invisible for multiple games at a time like a Kennedy. I can't believe we are giving up on Despres already, in addition I can't believe out of all people LOVEJOY is the one taking his playing time. Give the kid 20 games, consistently, at the Pro level.
I'm really getting irritated by HCDB+GMRS right now. They better both hope Bortuzzo is the real thing. I'd hate to see not 1 of Borts, Strait, and Despres be a legit top 4 for us.... "We build from within, then trade them once they get there" -Pens



mikey287 wrote:Another thread on the same subjects already being discussed in what feels like 10 others...?
No. Value-wise, it's really not bad, to be honest. But in real terms, I don't care for it that much. In a video game though it makes sense...


Rylan wrote:I'd rather Heatley over Setoguchi


mikey287 wrote:Another thread on the same subjects already being discussed in what feels like 10 others...?
No. Value-wise, it's really not bad, to be honest. But in real terms, I don't care for it that much. In a video game though it makes sense...





Rylan wrote:My comment was more of a "aside from Clutteebuck, Heatley is the only other player from the Wild I want," than anything else.
Also, what is Havlat up to these days? Is he still with the Sharks?


largegarlic wrote:I don't know enough about Setoguchi to comment on this particular proposed deal, but I don't object to the general idea of trading Despres. It's obvious that the Pens will have to use their stock of blue-chip d-man prospects to pull off any major trade. Despres is probably to most valuable of these prospects at this point, since he is the only one with actual NHL games under his belt. Trading Despres wouldn't be a sign that the Pens are giving up on him or don't think he's going to reach his potential; it just means that he expendable piece that could get the deal done. I think the Pens still liked Goligoski when they made the Neal. They just made the calculation (correctly) that they had enough d-man prospects in the pipeline to make up for losing him.




Bioshock wrote:largegarlic wrote:I don't know enough about Setoguchi to comment on this particular proposed deal, but I don't object to the general idea of trading Despres. It's obvious that the Pens will have to use their stock of blue-chip d-man prospects to pull off any major trade. Despres is probably to most valuable of these prospects at this point, since he is the only one with actual NHL games under his belt. Trading Despres wouldn't be a sign that the Pens are giving up on him or don't think he's going to reach his potential; it just means that he expendable piece that could get the deal done. I think the Pens still liked Goligoski when they made the Neal. They just made the calculation (correctly) that they had enough d-man prospects in the pipeline to make up for losing him.
This is my feelings exactly. I see other people saying the Pens are "giving up" on Despres. Nothing could be further from the truth. It's just that when you have essentially 6 guys who are coming along well and have a ton of pedrigree, you can afford to trade from that strength to get more in other areas.
Despres will be a stud. The only question is if it will be here or somewhere else.

Users browsing this forum: adambpsu, Admin, CERV96, GDR, offsides, sdb4121, Sigwolf and 76 guests