Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf


pfim wrote:I don't really understand what's going on in this thread.






Idoit40fans wrote:I think people are acting like he should be playing top 6 either in the NHL or AHL. I don't see anything wrong with that.


mikey287 wrote:saints11 wrote:If Boychuk can finish then he is ahead of Kennedy. Being a realist, as opposed to a hater, I'd rather have him on the wing with Sutter. They. Know each other and played in Carolina together. Still, I doubt HCDB removes Kennedy from the line-up. And so it continues...mikey287 wrote:Dupuis-Crosby-Bennett (or swap the sides they play on if you want)
Kunitz-Malkin-Neal
Cooke-Sutter-Kennedy
Glass-Vitale-Adams
Kennedy can be swapped with Vitale for the haters. Jeffrey can be swapped for any of the fourth liners for the well wishers.
In 5 or 6 games from now when Bennett is considered a bust and a juice box or whatever that one poster called him, then we can try Boychuk up there so he doesn't have to get involved in anything but finishing off Crosby passes...with Malkin, there's more involved...with Crosby it's just: watch, wait until he draws 4 players to him, then make yourself available for a wide open net, finish. Boychuk can finish, but he can't do all that much else it seems.
Once that fails, then we can panic...
If Boychuk could play on the bottom two lines he wouldn't have been waived. I wouldn't want him on the third line with Sutter even if they drank milk out of the same bag in kindergarten...know him or not, it doesn't help the team to put Boychuk on a line designed to stop the opposition from scoring. Three guys with "eh" vision at best, one is slowing down quite a bit (Cooke), one is still learning (Sutter) and one doesn't play defense or even meaningfully compete every game (Boychuk)....it's disastrous concoction, IMO. Kennedy might not be a prize pig (hmph, look at that...) but he belongs on the right side of that line or he belongs on another team basically...anything else I think is just silly...



Gaucho wrote: It sets him apart from one-trick ponies like Matt Moulson or PA Parenteau, who would never play in a Top 6 role on a serious contender.


pfim wrote:Dupuis has the most even strength goals on the team. Last year he was tied for second with Neal. He's a top 6 forward.

shmenguin wrote:Gaucho wrote: It sets him apart from one-trick ponies like Matt Moulson or PA Parenteau, who would never play in a Top 6 role on a serious contender.
hmmm...not sure about that. we were a serious contender with sykora in the top 6. if these guys are 1 dimensional, sykora was like 1/8th dimensional

Gaucho wrote:shmenguin wrote:Gaucho wrote: It sets him apart from one-trick ponies like Matt Moulson or PA Parenteau, who would never play in a Top 6 role on a serious contender.
hmmm...not sure about that. we were a serious contender with sykora in the top 6. if these guys are 1 dimensional, sykora was like 1/8th dimensional
Hm, yes, good point. Although I do think that Sykora is better than PA or MM.


meow wrote:Gaucho wrote:shmenguin wrote:Gaucho wrote: It sets him apart from one-trick ponies like Matt Moulson or PA Parenteau, who would never play in a Top 6 role on a serious contender.
hmmm...not sure about that. we were a serious contender with sykora in the top 6. if these guys are 1 dimensional, sykora was like 1/8th dimensional
Hm, yes, good point. Although I do think that Sykora is better than PA or MM.
Sykora was also scratched for 6 of the 7 finals games






pfim wrote:Dupuis has the most even strength goals on the team. Last year he was tied for second with Neal. He's a top 6 forward.

Users browsing this forum: Fast B, FreeCandy44, pens2005 and 19 guests