Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf


pugilist13 wrote:MRandall25 wrote:All it proves is that you'll have a higher rating if you played protected minutes instead of against top lines.
Tend to disagree a bit. Bottom pair guys and 4th liners often get stuck out there against top lines on the road, because of the last change. If +/- has any relevance at all, it's with these guys.

pekkasteele wrote:I don't get it. Despres and Bort have more upside. Sure, Eaton is a "have been there, done that" .... but he did not do it very good.

Eaton sucks these days. This seems like a desperation move when none was needed. RS royally screwed up with his mismanagement of the D recently and maybe he can redeem himself with a trade or two at the deadline, but Eaton isn't a NHL-caliber these days by any measure.


saints11 wrote:As much as you could see this happening, Eaton was bad on the Island last season. However, HCDB is a veterans coach. Just get the feeling they are not real confident in the play of Despres. It would not surprise me if he is being shopped to get a top 6. I for one would not be confident with a back line of Eaton and
Engelland.

Kovy27 wrote:saints11 wrote:As much as you could see this happening, Eaton was bad on the Island last season. However, HCDB is a veterans coach. Just get the feeling they are not real confident in the play of Despres. It would not surprise me if he is being shopped to get a top 6. I for one would not be confident with a back line of Eaton and
Engelland.
Everyone is bad defensively on the Island.



saints11 wrote:I meant he was caught out of position and has slowed down. Should say something when they let him go and claimed Strait on waivers. Totally feel we get more out of Despres, Borts, and Reese. But not our call, just feel that he will be taking ice from youngsters who need that time. We have all these young d-men who will
step aside so Eaton can play? Just don't feel that we are maximizing our assets.



Kovy27 wrote:saints11 wrote:As much as you could see this happening, Eaton was bad on the Island last season. However, HCDB is a veterans coach. Just get the feeling they are not real confident in the play of Despres. It would not surprise me if he is being shopped to get a top 6. I for one would not be confident with a back line of Eaton and
Engelland.
Everyone is bad defensively on the Island.






brwi wrote:
Eaton sucks these days. This seems like a desperation move when none was needed. RS royally screwed up with his mismanagement of the D recently and maybe he can redeem himself with a trade or two at the deadline, but Eaton isn't a NHL-caliber these days by any measure.



columbia wrote:At its worst, this is a completely neutral move.
I don't understand the hand wringing.


Digitalgypsy66 wrote:The Pens used 8 defenseman in 24 games on the way to the Cup in 2009, and 11 over the course of the season.
Depth wins championships.
The Islanders were 4th worst team in the league in goals against, and with the level of goaltending and team defense (is Capuano a good coach?) anyone looks bad. Eaton isn't a top pairing guy, but is nice depth in a system and surroundings that he's comfortable with already.

Users browsing this forum: beLIEve, Mr. Colby, npv708, saleen66, sniper and 16 guests