meecrofilm wrote:That's also a comlpetely worthless, pointless list in my eyes. It was like, 7 months after the draft
JoseCuervo wrote:slappybrown wrote:Staggy wrote:Lolol Caps fans are completely livid
Their HFBoard's current status is Chernobyl. I almost feel bad for them.
Is it as bad as LGP when the Pens didn't draft him? or worse?
JoseCuervo wrote:meecrofilm wrote:That's also a comlpetely worthless, pointless list in my eyes. It was like, 7 months after the draft
Yea, there are still just as many questions with most of these players as before.
NashvilleCat wrote:jwest21 wrote:Does anyone else still have the Hello Kitty next to LGP in their favorites on IE?
I did. I deleted the cookies then logged in again and the Kitty went away.
Henry Hank wrote:NYR win the Clowe sweepstakes I'm hardly one to base a player's worth on stuff like goals and assists, but it's amazing the market that existed for a guy with no goals in 28 games this season.
Tomorrow's going to be extremely dull.
taz71 wrote:I think I would still take Morrow over Clowe but Morrow needs to play with better linemates almost like we aren't giving him a chance.
Desiato wrote:At the moment, I'm not concerned about Morrow at all. He's a pure playoff pickup. I'd prefer it if he doesn't get too battered in the regular season. The best place for him, by far, is with Malkin and Neal. I don't like the look of Iginla-Geno-Neal. They get chances and have produced, but I don't see an acceptance of roles. Too much scoring alpha, not enough deference. Morrow knows his place on that line. Geno and Neal have chemistry that shouldn't be **** with.
I think Iginla needs to be a clear option A or B when he's on the ice. It's still ingrained in his style and personality.
It's impossible not to like Shero's deals, but I'm a bit concerned about top-4 defensive D depth. I'm not down on Orpik like a lot of people are, but I think the Pens are counting on too much from him in a deep playoff run. I would like to have seen some insurance for Orpik.
Froggy wrote:top-4 defensive depth? is that a thing? We were missing arguably 3 of our top 4 guys. That would murder any team in the league. We are fine replacing our bottom pair, and our bottom pair can play 2nd pair in a pinch. that's all you can reasonably expect with half of our top 6 out.
Fire0nice228 wrote:Matt Niskanen has been beyond garbage for a few games now, so that doesn't help. Usually he's not this bad, even in an elevated role on the short term.
Desiato wrote:Froggy wrote:top-4 defensive depth? is that a thing? We were missing arguably 3 of our top 4 guys. That would murder any team in the league. We are fine replacing our bottom pair, and our bottom pair can play 2nd pair in a pinch. that's all you can reasonably expect with half of our top 6 out.
I said top-4 defensive d depth. Pens could use someone who can step up and replace Orpik if need be. The transition D depth is exceptional, but the mobile, physical D depth is lacking IMO.
Users browsing this forum: Zalapski33 and 13 guests