If BB keeps playing solid hockey I see know reason to mess with the top two lines.
Oh yeah, that #68 seems to be still playing pretty good hockey for Dallas. Just sayin.... I know, I'll do it for ya

Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf


praxitas wrote:I would like to echo the sentiment of not resigning Rupp, only to resign a slightly cheaper, but way less effective alternative. Horrible decision making there IMO.





Nizzy wrote:I honestly hope its a first round exit, and pressure is put on Shero to can Bylsma. I just hope they bring in a big name, and not promote from within... I'm sure Bylsma will still have his deer in the headlights post game.

Niskanen, Kennedy, Glass, and a pick to San Jose for Murray, Clowe, and a pick



Hugo Stiglitz wrote:After the first line, the scoring drops off SIGNIFICANTLY. Getting someone like Iginla or Setoguchi is of paramount importance. Getting a player like that fixes another weakness which is making the third line better. If the Pens acquire Iginla, who ever falls to the third line will make that line much better. Dupuis has emerged as true top-six winger and there's obviously no need for Sid to upgrade, but getting an Iginla-type moves Dupuis down to the third and gives us a pretty lethal third line. If the Penguins were to acquire a Setoguchi or Ott, those are two players who could play on the third line and make it lethal.

saints11 wrote:There are those who will tell you that Harrington is the purest gem of all the young defensemen; so I doubt he will be the first moved. I would much rather move Niskanen or Engelland. The need is to acquire size for the D pairings, that means guys like Murray, Smid, Regehr, or Hainsey.
The other major problem is bottom 6 grit and the PK. We would have to be blind not to acknowledge the chemistry of the top line and be concerned about breaking it up; however, I still feel that Duper is playing up and benefits mostly from the work of Sid and Kuny. Duper gives us an immediate upgrade to the 3rd line, which could solve many problems there. Also, by moving Duper off the top line might give him greater focus for the PK. You don't just move him off that line for anyone, a finisher like Iggy justifies it.
For me; I'd move what is necessary to secure Iggy. Move a package of Niskanen, Kennedy, Glass, and a pick to San Jose for Murray, Clowe, and a pick; and Bortuzzo and Engelland to Edmonton for Smid.
D pairings: Orpik and Martin; Letang and Smid; Despres and Murray/Eaton
Lines:Kunitz--Crosby--Iggy; Bennett--Malkin--Neal; Cooke--Sutter--Dupuis; Clowe--Jeffrey--Adams

Murray, Clowe, and Smid are all UFA's; as is Iginla. Any trade speculation listed did not include Iginla, who I would expect would demand a #1 pick, plus a D prospect. Smid is someone that could be resigned, not sure about Murray who might just be a rental. Clowe and Iginla are different stories.FLPensFan wrote:saints11 wrote:There are those who will tell you that Harrington is the purest gem of all the young defensemen; so I doubt he will be the first moved. I would much rather move Niskanen or Engelland. The need is to acquire size for the D pairings, that means guys like Murray, Smid, Regehr, or Hainsey.
The other major problem is bottom 6 grit and the PK. We would have to be blind not to acknowledge the chemistry of the top line and be concerned about breaking it up; however, I still feel that Duper is playing up and benefits mostly from the work of Sid and Kuny. Duper gives us an immediate upgrade to the 3rd line, which could solve many problems there. Also, by moving Duper off the top line might give him greater focus for the PK. You don't just move him off that line for anyone, a finisher like Iggy justifies it.
For me; I'd move what is necessary to secure Iggy. Move a package of Niskanen, Kennedy, Glass, and a pick to San Jose for Murray, Clowe, and a pick; and Bortuzzo and Engelland to Edmonton for Smid.
D pairings: Orpik and Martin; Letang and Smid; Despres and Murray/Eaton
Lines:Kunitz--Crosby--Iggy; Bennett--Malkin--Neal; Cooke--Sutter--Dupuis; Clowe--Jeffrey--Adams
The ranking of the young defensemen is probably debatable, but the 3 sources I reviewed for prospects, Harrington was ranked the lowest in all 3. Engelland isn't going to fetch you much of a return, maybe 4th line grit player, that's about it. Niskanen has salary, and is kind of in limbo in terms of his place. Some see him as a bottom pair, some see him as a 3-4.
If the Pens could only make one move, Smid would be the move to make IMO. I've read some reports even today that Ryan Whitney will definitely be moved, and oddly, the Oilers have had no talks with Smid about extending him. Smid is only 27 is the type of d-man they need (and the Pens should want).
I think to get Iginila, Murray, Clowe, and Smid would cost more than Niskanen, Bortuzzo, Engelland, Kennedy, Glass and a pick. I don't see any way possible to not get one of the "better" players available, Smid, Iginla, etc, without the Pens giving up one of their prospects (Morrow, Pouliot, Dumoulin, Harrington, Maata, Despres).

shmenguin wrote:Hugo Stiglitz wrote:After the first line, the scoring drops off SIGNIFICANTLY. Getting someone like Iginla or Setoguchi is of paramount importance. Getting a player like that fixes another weakness which is making the third line better. If the Pens acquire Iginla, who ever falls to the third line will make that line much better. Dupuis has emerged as true top-six winger and there's obviously no need for Sid to upgrade, but getting an Iginla-type moves Dupuis down to the third and gives us a pretty lethal third line. If the Penguins were to acquire a Setoguchi or Ott, those are two players who could play on the third line and make it lethal.
jordan staal makes a 3rd line lethal. these other guys make it better, but not as much as you think.

saints11 wrote:There are those who will tell you that Harrington is the purest gem of all the young defensemen; so I doubt he will be the first moved. I would much rather move Niskanen or Engelland. The need is to acquire size for the D pairings, that means guys like Murray, Smid, Regehr, or Hainsey.
The other major problem is bottom 6 grit and the PK. We would have to be blind not to acknowledge the chemistry of the top line and be concerned about breaking it up; however, I still feel that Duper is playing up and benefits mostly from the work of Sid and Kuny. Duper gives us an immediate upgrade to the 3rd line, which could solve many problems there. Also, by moving Duper off the top line might give him greater focus for the PK. You don't just move him off that line for anyone, a finisher like Iggy justifies it.
For me; I'd move what is necessary to secure Iggy. Move a package of Niskanen, Kennedy, Glass, and a pick to San Jose for Murray, Clowe, and a pick; and Bortuzzo and Engelland to Edmonton for Smid.
D pairings: Orpik and Martin; Letang and Smid; Despres and Murray/Eaton
Lines:Kunitz--Crosby--Iggy; Bennett--Malkin--Neal; Cooke--Sutter--Dupuis; Clowe--Jeffrey--Adams

joe icepick wrote:saints11 wrote:There are those who will tell you that Harrington is the purest gem of all the young defensemen; so I doubt he will be the first moved. I would much rather move Niskanen or Engelland. The need is to acquire size for the D pairings, that means guys like Murray, Smid, Regehr, or Hainsey.
The other major problem is bottom 6 grit and the PK. We would have to be blind not to acknowledge the chemistry of the top line and be concerned about breaking it up; however, I still feel that Duper is playing up and benefits mostly from the work of Sid and Kuny. Duper gives us an immediate upgrade to the 3rd line, which could solve many problems there. Also, by moving Duper off the top line might give him greater focus for the PK. You don't just move him off that line for anyone, a finisher like Iggy justifies it.
For me; I'd move what is necessary to secure Iggy. Move a package of Niskanen, Kennedy, Glass, and a pick to San Jose for Murray, Clowe, and a pick; and Bortuzzo and Engelland to Edmonton for Smid.
D pairings: Orpik and Martin; Letang and Smid; Despres and Murray/Eaton
Lines:Kunitz--Crosby--Iggy; Bennett--Malkin--Neal; Cooke--Sutter--Dupuis; Clowe--Jeffrey--Adams
Does anyone know what we signed Glass for.





joe icepick wrote:Does anyone know what we signed Glass for.


NJ5934 wrote:I don't understand all the poo pooing on Glass. While I never agreed with the decision to not resign Rupp, I think Glass has been the "safe/regular shift" enforcer everyone around hear wanted. The guy gets 1.1 to hit, fight and play on the PK. What else do you want the guy to do.....he skates 5 minutes a night with CFA?!?
I'm all for adding some more grit but I see no reason to do so at the expense of Glass.

FLPensFan wrote:NJ5934 wrote:I don't understand all the poo pooing on Glass. While I never agreed with the decision to not resign Rupp, I think Glass has been the "safe/regular shift" enforcer everyone around hear wanted. The guy gets 1.1 to hit, fight and play on the PK. What else do you want the guy to do.....he skates 5 minutes a night with CFA?!?
I'm all for adding some more grit but I see no reason to do so at the expense of Glass.
I haven't been impressed with him. I envisioned a guy kinda like Matt Cooke before the suspensions. A guy who went out and hit every shift and was tough to play against. I just haven't seen it the way I expected. That said, his numbers are a bit better than I expected. He leads the Pens in hits, and averages about 2-3 hits per game. He is 20th overall with 69 hits this season. Matt Martin of the Isles and Steve Ott with BUF are 1-2 in hits, and are getting about 5-6 hits per game.
I guess I expected someone more like a young Colby Armstrong with some big hits now and then, or like Tyler Wright/Jarkko Rutuu, who got under the oppositions skin.

Digitalgypsy66 wrote:I'm thinking a lot of the issues are with puck possession. Sustained forecheck and cycling by the bottom six seem to be problematic, so that's where I would look to improve. A good role player with speed who can cycle.
As we all know, you don't give up goals when you play hard in the offensive zone. Sustained pressure leads to PP opportunities and so on.
