Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf




Idoit40fans wrote:Its not like Carolina is an aging team that needs to reload through the draft. Hard to call them losers in that deal.




penmyst wrote:Staal is a better player. More tools. When he does a better job of engaging Beast Mode more consistently, he'll hit a higher level than Sutter ever will.
But Sutter is a better fit for the Pens. He'll nestle right in that 3rd line C role, occasionally stepping up to 2nd line C as required by injuries. Solid, hockey-smart player with decent toolset. All at a much more manageable salary hit for the Pens.
This is the types of trades that make sense, as both teams get something they want/need. Instead of the typical fan-demanded trades where we give all our bad guys for all their great guys.


brwi wrote:penmyst wrote:Staal is a better player. More tools. When he does a better job of engaging Beast Mode more consistently, he'll hit a higher level than Sutter ever will.
But Sutter is a better fit for the Pens. He'll nestle right in that 3rd line C role, occasionally stepping up to 2nd line C as required by injuries. Solid, hockey-smart player with decent toolset. All at a much more manageable salary hit for the Pens.
This is the types of trades that make sense, as both teams get something they want/need. Instead of the typical fan-demanded trades where we give all our bad guys for all their great guys.
Exactly. This is a deal that everyone benefited from. Pens needed the extra cap room that Staal won't now be taking up because they are have a couple of big contracts coming up they have to deal with and the cap is going down next year. Staal didn't want to be a winger or 3rd line center for life and Carolina offered up a pretty good young player who is affordable to the Pens + more. Sutter isn't as good defensively as Staal but works pretty hard and has some offensive upside that he's obviously shown with some big goals recently.
Both teams are happy and so are the players involved.....hard to make those kind of deals in any sport. We're happy, they're happy....all good.


GaryRissling wrote:Putting it into perspective, Shero got more for Staal than Patrick got for Jagr.


Gaucho wrote:GaryRissling wrote:Putting it into perspective, Shero got more for Staal than Patrick got for Jagr.
Jagr was only one of many salary dumps. Patrick probably wept a lot behind closed doors on those days.


Player Team Pos GP G A P +/- PIM PP SH GW OT S S% TOI/G Sft/G FO%
8 Brandon Sutter PIT C 28 8 5 13 +7 4 2 0 3 1 49 16.3 15:57 20.4 50.2
5 Jordan Staal CAR C 26 6 12 18 -3 18 0 0 1 0 63 9.5 19:40 26.2 51.4

Guinness wrote:I'm not so sure Sutter wouldn't be a guy who will make a big play in the SCF.


GaryRissling wrote:Putting it into perspective, Shero got more for Staal than Patrick got for Jagr.


thepittman wrote:If sutter was on the second line all season, he would be on track to dwarf Jordan Staal's numbers.

Gaucho wrote:thepittman wrote:If sutter was on the second line all season, he would be on track to dwarf Jordan Staal's numbers.
I, uh, beg to differ. Or do you mean on the second line with Geno and Neal? Which, imo, would be a terrible idea.


shmenguin wrote:The logic in this thread seems to say that Sutter is a better fit for this team because he's a worse player that is comfortable on the 3rd line. That doesn't add up. Staal is a better fit because he's much more talented. Even when he's crammed into a 3rd line spot. Our 3rd line has been nothing this year, offensively, and about the same as last year defensively, IMO.
Staal is a better player and a better fit. Having said that, Sutter is a solid player, and Shero definitely got a great return for staal. But at the same, swapping staal for Sutter still may end up being a significant drop when we need someone to make a big play in game 4 of the SCF or something. So in that sense, I'm still not sure I like that we traded him - even though we would lose him anyways this summer.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests