MRandall25 wrote:But yeah, let's get rid of a 40 goal scorer. Makes sense.
offsides wrote:He definitely needs to clean up his act. When he gets frustrated, he goes head hunting way too often. He is too good a player to not be able to control himself.
Grunthy wrote:Was I the only one that laughed when it happened? I mean I thought it was dirty and all, but the player it happened to made me laugh a little bit.
JarkkoVision wrote:That was dirty. They don't need a player like that on the team. They don't need other teams targeting players because they're thought of as a dirty team.
Pens4Life wrote:No need to trade Neal,but that sh.. better not happen again.
offsides wrote:Grunthy wrote:Was I the only one that laughed when it happened? I mean I thought it was dirty and all, but the player it happened to made me laugh a little bit.
Would you have laughed if it had really connected? What about if Sid had been the target?
Dirty and suspension worthy play with intent to injure.
M10 wrote:While it was in bad taste, I think you can say that had it been any other Bruin aside from Marchand and Neal skates away from that scenario.
There's history between the two, which isn't saying much considering Marchand has made it a point to develop history with every one in the league.
MRandall25 wrote:FreeCandy44 wrote:I love James Neal. But it was a dirty play and he should sit for a few games.
No one disagrees with that.
Users browsing this forum: Humperdink and 11 guests