Man, I can't get that here in Canda... They are blocking us canucks...
WINNIPEG IS A PART OF CANADA.
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
saveourpens wrote:I don't recall Crosby being so confident with his slapshots or one timers. imo, it's obvious that he's feeding off of Malkin.

Brode wrote:Man, I can't get that here in Canda... They are blocking us canucks...
WINNIPEG IS A PART OF CANADA.

Like I said, a few good bounces next period, this game is over. Unless we go into the dump and trap mode.eastonpensfan wrote:This is shocking stuff...
Pens are leading shots 15-10, faceoffs 12-10, and you get the feeling they should be leading by more than 1-0.

minimal wrote:Man, I can't get that here in Canda... They are blocking us canucks...
Crap. And no radio feed!!! ARGH!!!!!!

Brode wrote:We can't have Malkin and Crosby playing together, except on the powerplay. Ekman, Malone and Colby played 12 minutes in total, while Recchi, Crosby and Malk had 21. We had alot of powerplay time, but still. Our second line needs more than 12 minutes a game, and they would be much better with Malkin there.


When you need a goal you put your best players out there
They want to be out there when the game is on the line
It is simply an impossibility to even consider benching one of those guys when you NEED THAT GOAL.
I must have missed something... Staal is fine and he will only get better with those long strides.Rychster wrote:Say what you want about Staal but the guy has closing speed IMO. He not only catches up to guys to take the puck away, he can explode to separate. What is with this "slow" guy talk on this MB?
Sure, he WILL get faster and stronger but he can hold his own NOW!

NIN wrote:Brode wrote:We can't have Malkin and Crosby playing together, except on the powerplay. Ekman, Malone and Colby played 12 minutes in total, while Recchi, Crosby and Malk had 21. We had alot of powerplay time, but still. Our second line needs more than 12 minutes a game, and they would be much better with Malkin there.
I hate to break it too all off you but Malkin and Crosby are ALWAYS GOING TO SHARE THE ICE TOGETHER. When you need a goal you put your best players out there to get it, Malkin or Corsby moving to wing IS NOT A BIG DEAL. It just isn't even an issue for players that good and most other players as well. They want to be out there when the game is on the line and they wont be happy if they are not out there when the game is on the line. It is simply an impossibility to even consider benching one of those guys when you NEED THAT GOAL. Get used to it.

Ron` wrote:I must have missed something... Staal is fine and he will only get better with those long strides.Rychster wrote:Say what you want about Staal but the guy has closing speed IMO. He not only catches up to guys to take the puck away, he can explode to separate. What is with this "slow" guy talk on this MB?
Sure, he WILL get faster and stronger but he can hold his own NOW!

Wow, you need a drink, relax your overreacting to his comments I think, just my opinion. Don't like what he said, ok, but think a bit before you get your blood pressure up. Sometimes the context is lost, and easily in a game thread.Brode wrote:When you need a goal you put your best players out there
Who disagreed with this? At what point is "when you need a goal"? I would consider those times to be powerplay, and last 5 minutes desperation. You do not put them together for even strength of the first period. that's just retarded.They want to be out there when the game is on the line
IT'S THE FIRST PERIOD.It is simply an impossibility to even consider benching one of those guys when you NEED THAT GOAL.
IT'S THE FIRST PERIOD. And BENCHING? Yeah, I sure said that we should bench Malkin. Jesus tap dancer.

Rychster wrote:Say what you want about Staal but the guy has closing speed IMO. He not only catches up to guys to take the puck away, he can explode to separate. What is with this "slow" guy talk on this MB?
Sure, he WILL get faster and stronger but he can hold his own NOW!
Brode wrote:When you need a goal you put your best players out there
Who disagreed with this? At what point is "when you need a goal"? I would consider those times to be powerplay, and last 5 minutes desperation. You do not put them together for even strength of the first period. that's just retarded.They want to be out there when the game is on the line
IT'S THE FIRST PERIOD.It is simply an impossibility to even consider benching one of those guys when you NEED THAT GOAL.
IT'S THE FIRST PERIOD. And BENCHING? Yeah, I sure said that we should bench Malkin. Jesus tap dancer.

Agree, you can see the power in that frame.NIN wrote:Rychster wrote:Say what you want about Staal but the guy has closing speed IMO. He not only catches up to guys to take the puck away, he can explode to separate. What is with this "slow" guy talk on this MB?
Sure, he WILL get faster and stronger but he can hold his own NOW!
Yeah his first push is going to continue to get more and more powerful. It's only a matter of time with that player...

Wow, you need a drink, relax your overreacting to his comments I think, just my opinion. Don't like what he said, ok, but think a bit before you get your blood pressure up. Sometimes the context is lost, and easily in a game thread.
Brode I feel for you, but "DON"T TRUST THE INTERNET" if you love hockey.Brode wrote:Wow, you need a drink, relax your overreacting to his comments I think, just my opinion. Don't like what he said, ok, but think a bit before you get your blood pressure up. Sometimes the context is lost, and easily in a game thread.
I don't think you understand that YAHOO WON'T LET ME WATCH THIS GAME.

Ron` wrote:Wow, you need a drink, relax your overreacting to his comments I think, just my opinion. Don't like what he said, ok, but think a bit before you get your blood pressure up. Sometimes the context is lost, and easily in a game thread.Brode wrote:When you need a goal you put your best players out there
Who disagreed with this? At what point is "when you need a goal"? I would consider those times to be powerplay, and last 5 minutes desperation. You do not put them together for even strength of the first period. that's just retarded.They want to be out there when the game is on the line
IT'S THE FIRST PERIOD.It is simply an impossibility to even consider benching one of those guys when you NEED THAT GOAL.
IT'S THE FIRST PERIOD. And BENCHING? Yeah, I sure said that we should bench Malkin. Jesus tap dancer.
Users browsing this forum: Dutchpensfan and 28 guests