Hawkeynut wrote:This playoffs convinced me that Fleury is just fine as the Pens goaltender moving forward. There is no other goalie available that is better (IMO). Sure it would be nice to have a "Luck"vist but that is just not happening.
I am fine with the Flower.... but I think as an organization, they need to start working on the replacement.
shafnutz05 wrote:I've been a Fleury detractor in the past, but no way. He was workable, if not outstanding, in these playoffs. When our "stars" are choking, what is he supposed to do?
That being said, he was outplayed thoroughly tonight.
Crankshaft wrote:Of the 52 votes, I'm convinced that Jim created 7 other accounts that total all 8 of the "No" votes.
MalkinIsMyHomeboy wrote:I don't understand why people on here think he's matured in one season. He was laughably horrendous last season. So bad that we inserted the AARP member Vokoun.
He had a few good games and a few terrible ones as well.
Lundqvist never makes those plays.
Lt. Dish wrote:Don't goalies really hit their stride in their 30s? I don't know, but I recall reading that in more than a few places.
MalkinIsMyHomeboy wrote:Lt. Dish wrote:Don't goalies really hit their stride in their 30s? I don't know, but I recall reading that in more than a few places.
I think it depends on the goalie's style. If they depend on athleticism and quickness then I think it hurts them.
Users browsing this forum: Pitts and 14 guests