stimpy wrote: I say 'Pittsburgh' arena situation because this is much more than a hockey arena. It's an asset the region needs badly.
stimpy wrote:Here is a sampling of the Rendell double speak:
"No public money is available for an arena". The Pens announce their intention to get the slots license.
"The NHL probably won't support an arena from slots revenue". The NHL gives their support of the Pens plan.
"The Pens proposal needs local support". Eighteen local politicians officially endorse the Pens plan. (these 18 are minus the mayor & county commisioner)
"The Pens need to have a Plan B". The only Plan B option is public money, which takes us back to the beginning.
As you can see, Rendell is just trying his best to make the Pens look bad so that when the license is given to FCE (a Cleveland corp at that), he doesn't look like the bad guy.
ExPatriatePen wrote:But if you're open to constructive suggestions, next time continue the Pittsburgh (not Pens) theme.
Shooters wrote:Great letter except for adding Madden. Should have mentioned Stan Savran instead of Madden.
Users browsing this forum: Chirpin' Grinder, darkstar57, Dickie Dunn, Dr Rosenrosen, FLPensFan, IntangibleBeer, jf, largegarlic, lemieuxReturns, mikey287, NashvilleCat, NJ5934, SubtropicalPenguin, the riddler and 46 guests