Cim2217 wrote:I enjoy reading everyone’s thoughts on who will be traded away, who comes back our way, FA signings, and potential draft picks etc.
I just read an article stating Max Domi is the first name tied to the Penguins as a potential trade target. Not the first time that’s been mentioned over the years. The article states Domi is centering MTL’s 4th line, and may be expendable with the emergence of MTL’s young centers Suzuki, and Kotkanemi.
Who wants this trade to go down? Do we have the trade chips to bring Domi in? Will Domi be another player who gets traded here and never gets going ala Perron/Pearson/Brassard/Galchenyuk?
Pitts wrote:(Toronto) Andersen/Murray (Pittsburgh)
Very dumb rumor.
Murray should get better return. We have Jarry/DeSmith for next year.
ville5 wrote:Cim2217 wrote:I enjoy reading everyone’s thoughts on who will be traded away, who comes back our way, FA signings, and potential draft picks etc.
I just read an article stating Max Domi is the first name tied to the Penguins as a potential trade target. Not the first time that’s been mentioned over the years. The article states Domi is centering MTL’s 4th line, and may be expendable with the emergence of MTL’s young centers Suzuki, and Kotkanemi.
Who wants this trade to go down? Do we have the trade chips to bring Domi in? Will Domi be another player who gets traded here and never gets going ala Perron/Pearson/Brassard/Galchenyuk?
Is Bjugstad or McCann ++ an acceptable return for Bergevin? If so, do it.
Would Domi cost the 15th overall or Poulin or POJ? Forget about it.
Jim wrote:Pitts wrote:(Toronto) Andersen/Murray (Pittsburgh)
Very dumb rumor.
Murray should get better return. We have Jarry/DeSmith for next year.
What-his-face that came up with it openly admitted that he made it up himself yet Toronto fans are running with it. Probably because it is logical from the Leafs' side, even though 0% logical from the Pens side.
FLPensFan wrote:Murray to Minnesota for parts unknown. Suggested by Dave Molinari, after Guerin said he intends to upgrade his goaltending this offseason and Guerin obviously being hooked into the Penguins.
There were some suggestions here of Murray for Dubnyk, which, to me is just like the Toronto deal. We have no need for a goalie in return.
However, if Minnesota wanted to do, say Murray and Jack Johnson for Dubnyk, Brodin, and Greenway...yeah, sure, maybe.
FLPensFan wrote:Murray to Minnesota for parts unknown. Suggested by Dave Molinari, after Guerin said he intends to upgrade his goaltending this offseason and Guerin obviously being hooked into the Penguins.
There were some suggestions here of Murray for Dubnyk, which, to me is just like the Toronto deal. We have no need for a goalie in return.
However, if Minnesota wanted to do, say Murray and Jack Johnson for Dubnyk, Brodin, and Greenway...yeah, sure, maybe.
pens_CT wrote:FLPensFan wrote:Murray to Minnesota for parts unknown. Suggested by Dave Molinari, after Guerin said he intends to upgrade his goaltending this offseason and Guerin obviously being hooked into the Penguins.
There were some suggestions here of Murray for Dubnyk, which, to me is just like the Toronto deal. We have no need for a goalie in return.
However, if Minnesota wanted to do, say Murray and Jack Johnson for Dubnyk, Brodin, and Greenway...yeah, sure, maybe.
I think Minnesota would rather cut ties with Dumba instead of Brodin. However unless you're moving Letang somewhere else adding Dumba doesn't make much sense based on his salary, and the fact he plays the right side.
thehockeyguru wrote:pens_CT wrote:FLPensFan wrote:Murray to Minnesota for parts unknown. Suggested by Dave Molinari, after Guerin said he intends to upgrade his goaltending this offseason and Guerin obviously being hooked into the Penguins.
There were some suggestions here of Murray for Dubnyk, which, to me is just like the Toronto deal. We have no need for a goalie in return.
However, if Minnesota wanted to do, say Murray and Jack Johnson for Dubnyk, Brodin, and Greenway...yeah, sure, maybe.
I think Minnesota would rather cut ties with Dumba instead of Brodin. However unless you're moving Letang somewhere else adding Dumba doesn't make much sense based on his salary, and the fact he plays the right side.
Dumba is a right shot, Brodin is a left. Do they both play the right side? I think the preference is for a RHD to play bottom pairing correct?
pens_CT wrote:thehockeyguru wrote:pens_CT wrote:FLPensFan wrote:Murray to Minnesota for parts unknown. Suggested by Dave Molinari, after Guerin said he intends to upgrade his goaltending this offseason and Guerin obviously being hooked into the Penguins.
There were some suggestions here of Murray for Dubnyk, which, to me is just like the Toronto deal. We have no need for a goalie in return.
However, if Minnesota wanted to do, say Murray and Jack Johnson for Dubnyk, Brodin, and Greenway...yeah, sure, maybe.
I think Minnesota would rather cut ties with Dumba instead of Brodin. However unless you're moving Letang somewhere else adding Dumba doesn't make much sense based on his salary, and the fact he plays the right side.
Dumba is a right shot, Brodin is a left. Do they both play the right side? I think the preference is for a RHD to play bottom pairing correct?
Brodin plays the left side as far as I know, and you know Sullivan would play Dumba on the right, which is probably the better spot for him. My point was if you get Dumba, you're not going to pay a guy 6 million to play on the third pairing.
thehockeyguru wrote:pens_CT wrote:thehockeyguru wrote:pens_CT wrote:FLPensFan wrote:Murray to Minnesota for parts unknown. Suggested by Dave Molinari, after Guerin said he intends to upgrade his goaltending this offseason and Guerin obviously being hooked into the Penguins.
There were some suggestions here of Murray for Dubnyk, which, to me is just like the Toronto deal. We have no need for a goalie in return.
However, if Minnesota wanted to do, say Murray and Jack Johnson for Dubnyk, Brodin, and Greenway...yeah, sure, maybe.
I think Minnesota would rather cut ties with Dumba instead of Brodin. However unless you're moving Letang somewhere else adding Dumba doesn't make much sense based on his salary, and the fact he plays the right side.
Dumba is a right shot, Brodin is a left. Do they both play the right side? I think the preference is for a RHD to play bottom pairing correct?
Brodin plays the left side as far as I know, and you know Sullivan would play Dumba on the right, which is probably the better spot for him. My point was if you get Dumba, you're not going to pay a guy 6 million to play on the third pairing.
I agree with you, the long term pairing could very well be POJ and Marino so why not try it as you 3rd pairing and split time evenly?
Letang shouldn't be playing 25-26 minutes a night. Roll 3 defensive pairings and get Letang's minutes down to 21-22 tops
100565 wrote:
I like this. When healthy (lol), go with three pairs splitting time. With injuries, still have good top 4.
When the D plays well, so does the O.
I would take Dumba, Marino, Letang, Petterson, Dumo, and POJ.
Murray alone does not get Dumba, though...assuming Murray wants $5.5mil minimum.
pekkasteele wrote:Wy not try to make a bigge trade and send Murray, Letang and JJ, and get Dubnyk, Dumba and Brodin .... and then some small parts more maybe?
Steve Dave wrote:pekkasteele wrote:Wy not try to make a bigge trade and send Murray, Letang and JJ, and get Dubnyk, Dumba and Brodin .... and then some small parts more maybe?
Add Aston-Reese to that and get back Dubnyk (50% retained), Dumba, Brodin, Pens first rounder and Greenway.
Cim2217 wrote:When GMRS took over, his goal was to make us harder to play against. He went out and got the best agitator in the game in Ruutu, got Dominic Moore, Ronald Petrovicky, and eventually Matt Cooke, Gary Roberts, and George Laraque.
I’ve always loved watching those kind of players do their thing on the ice all the while, being able to contribute with some occasional offense.
That’s why I loved the Tanev signing as he plays physical, and isn’t abysmal in other areas.
All that being said, I wouldn’t mind seeing GMJR sign Matt Martin to a reasonable contract and put him on the bottom 6.
The U wrote:Cim2217 wrote:When GMRS took over, his goal was to make us harder to play against. He went out and got the best agitator in the game in Ruutu, got Dominic Moore, Ronald Petrovicky, and eventually Matt Cooke, Gary Roberts, and George Laraque.
I’ve always loved watching those kind of players do their thing on the ice all the while, being able to contribute with some occasional offense.
That’s why I loved the Tanev signing as he plays physical, and isn’t abysmal in other areas.
All that being said, I wouldn’t mind seeing GMJR sign Matt Martin to a reasonable contract and put him on the bottom 6.
Those types of players all brought energy and an identity to the team. Nowadays saying you want tougher/bigger/physical players seems to be taboo. I will say this, watching a team that brings absolutely zero physicality to a hockey game is less entertaining to watch. We all watch for entertainment purposes so the fact that this team is not as fun to watch anymore is a bummer.
One of my biggest issues with the current roster is that there is almost ZERO physicality. You can’t play a contact sport and lose sight of the fact that part of the game is hitting. Hitting creates turnovers, makes defensemen rush passes, creates space, knocks guys down or takes them out of the play to create odd man chances, etc... As a defenseman playing against the Pens you don’t have to rush a pass or worry about retrieving a puck. We dump the puck in, race toward the wall, swing our stick at the puck and leave. Too easy for the other team. No stress, no fear. As an opposing forward you don’t have to keep your head up, you don’t have to worry about getting decked in front of our net. Again...no fear and too easy.
These things don’t always directly correlate to wins and losses but they are pieces that are part of the larger puzzle.
The entire team seems like they are 5’10 and 180lbs. They play like it. Note that I haven’t mentioned Fighting. I don’t think that matters at all anymore. It’s more about laying hits, playing with energy, and banging bodies to create chances and eliminate chances. The Pens have lacked so much energy and emotion over the last 2 playoff series it strikes me as one of their major issues. Not enough guys with their own identity that bring something unique to the table.
If the roster was constructed with an eye towards being small and soft then mission accomplished. But if you’re small and soft you better be MUCH faster and MUCH more skilled than your opponent. Unfortunately that’s not the case. The Pens rarely look to have the speed/quickness edge anymore. And if you are small/soft and going to turn the other cheek during physical games you better make the opponent pay on the PP.
So what do we hang our hats on? What is our competitive advantage? We are smaller/softer/slower/less skilled/less energetic than the other playoff-caliber teams?
sjnhiils wrote:The U wrote:Cim2217 wrote:When GMRS took over, his goal was to make us harder to play against. He went out and got the best agitator in the game in Ruutu, got Dominic Moore, Ronald Petrovicky, and eventually Matt Cooke, Gary Roberts, and George Laraque.
I’ve always loved watching those kind of players do their thing on the ice all the while, being able to contribute with some occasional offense.
That’s why I loved the Tanev signing as he plays physical, and isn’t abysmal in other areas.
All that being said, I wouldn’t mind seeing GMJR sign Matt Martin to a reasonable contract and put him on the bottom 6.
Those types of players all brought energy and an identity to the team. Nowadays saying you want tougher/bigger/physical players seems to be taboo. I will say this, watching a team that brings absolutely zero physicality to a hockey game is less entertaining to watch. We all watch for entertainment purposes so the fact that this team is not as fun to watch anymore is a bummer.
One of my biggest issues with the current roster is that there is almost ZERO physicality. You can’t play a contact sport and lose sight of the fact that part of the game is hitting. Hitting creates turnovers, makes defensemen rush passes, creates space, knocks guys down or takes them out of the play to create odd man chances, etc... As a defenseman playing against the Pens you don’t have to rush a pass or worry about retrieving a puck. We dump the puck in, race toward the wall, swing our stick at the puck and leave. Too easy for the other team. No stress, no fear. As an opposing forward you don’t have to keep your head up, you don’t have to worry about getting decked in front of our net. Again...no fear and too easy.
These things don’t always directly correlate to wins and losses but they are pieces that are part of the larger puzzle.
The entire team seems like they are 5’10 and 180lbs. They play like it. Note that I haven’t mentioned Fighting. I don’t think that matters at all anymore. It’s more about laying hits, playing with energy, and banging bodies to create chances and eliminate chances. The Pens have lacked so much energy and emotion over the last 2 playoff series it strikes me as one of their major issues. Not enough guys with their own identity that bring something unique to the table.
If the roster was constructed with an eye towards being small and soft then mission accomplished. But if you’re small and soft you better be MUCH faster and MUCH more skilled than your opponent. Unfortunately that’s not the case. The Pens rarely look to have the speed/quickness edge anymore. And if you are small/soft and going to turn the other cheek during physical games you better make the opponent pay on the PP.
So what do we hang our hats on? What is our competitive advantage? We are smaller/softer/slower/less skilled/less energetic than the other playoff-caliber teams?
Great summation of a poorly constructed roster!
KG wrote:sjnhiils wrote:The U wrote:Cim2217 wrote:When GMRS took over, his goal was to make us harder to play against. He went out and got the best agitator in the game in Ruutu, got Dominic Moore, Ronald Petrovicky, and eventually Matt Cooke, Gary Roberts, and George Laraque.
I’ve always loved watching those kind of players do their thing on the ice all the while, being able to contribute with some occasional offense.
That’s why I loved the Tanev signing as he plays physical, and isn’t abysmal in other areas.
All that being said, I wouldn’t mind seeing GMJR sign Matt Martin to a reasonable contract and put him on the bottom 6.
Those types of players all brought energy and an identity to the team. Nowadays saying you want tougher/bigger/physical players seems to be taboo. I will say this, watching a team that brings absolutely zero physicality to a hockey game is less entertaining to watch. We all watch for entertainment purposes so the fact that this team is not as fun to watch anymore is a bummer.
One of my biggest issues with the current roster is that there is almost ZERO physicality. You can’t play a contact sport and lose sight of the fact that part of the game is hitting. Hitting creates turnovers, makes defensemen rush passes, creates space, knocks guys down or takes them out of the play to create odd man chances, etc... As a defenseman playing against the Pens you don’t have to rush a pass or worry about retrieving a puck. We dump the puck in, race toward the wall, swing our stick at the puck and leave. Too easy for the other team. No stress, no fear. As an opposing forward you don’t have to keep your head up, you don’t have to worry about getting decked in front of our net. Again...no fear and too easy.
These things don’t always directly correlate to wins and losses but they are pieces that are part of the larger puzzle.
The entire team seems like they are 5’10 and 180lbs. They play like it. Note that I haven’t mentioned Fighting. I don’t think that matters at all anymore. It’s more about laying hits, playing with energy, and banging bodies to create chances and eliminate chances. The Pens have lacked so much energy and emotion over the last 2 playoff series it strikes me as one of their major issues. Not enough guys with their own identity that bring something unique to the table.
If the roster was constructed with an eye towards being small and soft then mission accomplished. But if you’re small and soft you better be MUCH faster and MUCH more skilled than your opponent. Unfortunately that’s not the case. The Pens rarely look to have the speed/quickness edge anymore. And if you are small/soft and going to turn the other cheek during physical games you better make the opponent pay on the PP.
So what do we hang our hats on? What is our competitive advantage? We are smaller/softer/slower/less skilled/less energetic than the other playoff-caliber teams?
Great summation of a poorly constructed roster!
That is what the coach wanted...JR would definitely like to add muscle. We all remember how the Reaves situation went down...
Users browsing this forum: Ericf and 12 guests