pens_CT wrote:Jim wrote:Rodrigues wasn't part of the plan, Warsofsky is an AHLer.
Aberg is alos an AHLer and a RFA, maybe will not get qualified? Lindgren is an Addison replacement.
Kapanen, Lindgren for #15, Hallander.
Toronto fan reaction seems overwhelmingly that they love this trade for them.
I wonder if Rutherford simply has ZERO trust in his amateur scouts.
Another Rutherford trade in the L column for me.
You consider it a L because:
(A) You expect the first round pick would make the team next year
(B) You love seeing Simon on the first line
(C) You see Hallander as the next Markus Naslund
(D) You don't see next year's team as being a contender regardless of who they acquire, so they just might as well sell
Pitts wrote:KG wrote:He is 24 signed for 2 more years at $3.2Mill. Will probably be on Sid's wing and could easily get to 30 goals.
What makes you assume this? All the talent he played with in Toronto?
thehockeyguru wrote:Pensfan4life8771 wrote:FLPensFan wrote:My takes on the trade:
--At time of trade: Grade of D. This trade basically boils down to Kapanen for 15th overall AND Hallander, who is one of our better prospects. Should not have cost us both, or if it did, we should have received
--How to move it to A/B level trade: I would have liked to have seen Timothy Liljegren back in the deal instead of Lindgren. Lindgren, whom we got, was a 4th round pick, playing only 2nd pairing minutes in the AHL. Liljegren was a former 1st rounder that has struggled to earn an NHL job, but he at least has a much higher upside than Lindgren. Other option would have been getting a 2nd rounder back in return. Pittsburgh gave up one of its better prospects....so should have Toronto.
--Penguins win this trade if: Kapanen becomes a 20 goal, 60 point player. If he stays where he is now, 40 points, 15-20 goal range....it's a loss.
Trust the process....I'm thinking the want for Murray and demand has increased to mid first pick level...Look at Ottawa...they need a franchise goalie and have not one but three first round picks. Just watch.
You keep the 15th and get another for Murray, then you bundle the two in order to move up.
Pitts wrote:pens_CT wrote:Jim wrote:Rodrigues wasn't part of the plan, Warsofsky is an AHLer.
Aberg is alos an AHLer and a RFA, maybe will not get qualified? Lindgren is an Addison replacement.
Kapanen, Lindgren for #15, Hallander.
Toronto fan reaction seems overwhelmingly that they love this trade for them.
I wonder if Rutherford simply has ZERO trust in his amateur scouts.
Another Rutherford trade in the L column for me.
You consider it a L because:
(A) You expect the first round pick would make the team next year
(B) You love seeing Simon on the first line
(C) You see Hallander as the next Markus Naslund
(D) You don't see next year's team as being a contender regardless of who they acquire, so they just might as well sell
(A) NO
(B) NO
(C) NO
(D) NO
Literally none of your points downplay the fact that this is a horribly unbalanced trade.
KG wrote:Pitts wrote:KG wrote:He is 24 signed for 2 more years at $3.2Mill. Will probably be on Sid's wing and could easily get to 30 goals.
What makes you assume this? All the talent he played with in Toronto?
He's 24. In his first full season he scored 20. He will be the #1 RW and play with Sid and I think he will continue to develop.
Just saw that the Pens had Kapanen rated 7th overall when they drafted him. They obviously love the player.
pens_CT wrote:Jim wrote:Rodrigues wasn't part of the plan, Warsofsky is an AHLer.
Aberg is alos an AHLer and a RFA, maybe will not get qualified? Lindgren is an Addison replacement.
Kapanen, Lindgren for #15, Hallander.
Toronto fan reaction seems overwhelmingly that they love this trade for them.
I wonder if Rutherford simply has ZERO trust in his amateur scouts.
Another Rutherford trade in the L column for me.
You consider it a L because:
(A) You expect the first round pick would make the team next year
(B) You love seeing Simon on the first line
(C) You see Hallander as the next Markus Naslund
(D) You don't see next year's team as being a contender regardless of who they acquire, so they just might as well sell
pens_CT wrote:Pitts wrote:pens_CT wrote:Jim wrote:Rodrigues wasn't part of the plan, Warsofsky is an AHLer.
Aberg is alos an AHLer and a RFA, maybe will not get qualified? Lindgren is an Addison replacement.
Kapanen, Lindgren for #15, Hallander.
Toronto fan reaction seems overwhelmingly that they love this trade for them.
I wonder if Rutherford simply has ZERO trust in his amateur scouts.
Another Rutherford trade in the L column for me.
You consider it a L because:
(A) You expect the first round pick would make the team next year
(B) You love seeing Simon on the first line
(C) You see Hallander as the next Markus Naslund
(D) You don't see next year's team as being a contender regardless of who they acquire, so they just might as well sell
(A) NO
(B) NO
(C) NO
(D) NO
Literally none of your points downplay the fact that this is a horribly unbalanced trade.
What in your mind makes it an unbalanced trade?
Pitts wrote:pens_CT wrote:Jim wrote:Rodrigues wasn't part of the plan, Warsofsky is an AHLer.
Aberg is alos an AHLer and a RFA, maybe will not get qualified? Lindgren is an Addison replacement.
Kapanen, Lindgren for #15, Hallander.
Toronto fan reaction seems overwhelmingly that they love this trade for them.
I wonder if Rutherford simply has ZERO trust in his amateur scouts.
Another Rutherford trade in the L column for me.
You consider it a L because:
(A) You expect the first round pick would make the team next year
(B) You love seeing Simon on the first line
(C) You see Hallander as the next Markus Naslund
(D) You don't see next year's team as being a contender regardless of who they acquire, so they just might as well sell
(A) NO
(B) NO
(C) NO
(D) NO
Literally none of your points downplay the fact that this is a horribly unbalanced trade.
thehockeyguru wrote:pens_CT wrote:penny lane wrote:Pontus Aberg- 5'11" 196. Paul Steirgerwald saying he was on the 17 Nashville roster? I don't remember him.
He's the guy who walked Maatta for the 1st goal in game 2 of the finals.
"Pontus Aberg wasn’t in the bubble and signed in the KHL for next season and was possibly only a member of this trade to balance contracts"
Ohio_Pens_fan wrote:So is Murray going to Calgary (Bennett) or Ottawa (Tierney)? Not straight up of course.
Pitts wrote:pens_CT wrote:Pitts wrote:pens_CT wrote:Jim wrote:Rodrigues wasn't part of the plan, Warsofsky is an AHLer.
Aberg is alos an AHLer and a RFA, maybe will not get qualified? Lindgren is an Addison replacement.
Kapanen, Lindgren for #15, Hallander.
Toronto fan reaction seems overwhelmingly that they love this trade for them.
I wonder if Rutherford simply has ZERO trust in his amateur scouts.
Another Rutherford trade in the L column for me.
You consider it a L because:
(A) You expect the first round pick would make the team next year
(B) You love seeing Simon on the first line
(C) You see Hallander as the next Markus Naslund
(D) You don't see next year's team as being a contender regardless of who they acquire, so they just might as well sell
(A) NO
(B) NO
(C) NO
(D) NO
Literally none of your points downplay the fact that this is a horribly unbalanced trade.
What in your mind makes it an unbalanced trade?
No need to include that #15 pick unless something else is brewing.
Jim wrote:pens_CT wrote:Jim wrote:Rodrigues wasn't part of the plan, Warsofsky is an AHLer.
Aberg is alos an AHLer and a RFA, maybe will not get qualified? Lindgren is an Addison replacement.
Kapanen, Lindgren for #15, Hallander.
Toronto fan reaction seems overwhelmingly that they love this trade for them.
I wonder if Rutherford simply has ZERO trust in his amateur scouts.
Another Rutherford trade in the L column for me.
You consider it a L because:
(A) You expect the first round pick would make the team next year
(B) You love seeing Simon on the first line
(C) You see Hallander as the next Markus Naslund
(D) You don't see next year's team as being a contender regardless of who they acquire, so they just might as well sell
I see it as a loss because it is gross overpay for the return. I see it as a bigger loss as I mistook which D was coming back. I am fine with Kapanen coming back to the Pens, I am not fine at it costing #15 and Hallander. Heck, that is basically what was paid for Zucker, and I wasn't a fan of that trade either, and Kapanen is no Zucker.
Jim wrote:Pitts wrote:pens_CT wrote:Jim wrote:Rodrigues wasn't part of the plan, Warsofsky is an AHLer.
Aberg is alos an AHLer and a RFA, maybe will not get qualified? Lindgren is an Addison replacement.
Kapanen, Lindgren for #15, Hallander.
Toronto fan reaction seems overwhelmingly that they love this trade for them.
I wonder if Rutherford simply has ZERO trust in his amateur scouts.
Another Rutherford trade in the L column for me.
You consider it a L because:
(A) You expect the first round pick would make the team next year
(B) You love seeing Simon on the first line
(C) You see Hallander as the next Markus Naslund
(D) You don't see next year's team as being a contender regardless of who they acquire, so they just might as well sell
(A) NO
(B) NO
(C) NO
(D) NO
Literally none of your points downplay the fact that this is a horribly unbalanced trade.
He's just trying to figure out a way to take a shot at me. He hasn't seen an article that tells him how to feel about this trade yet so he is just taking shots.
Don't worry man, someone will write your opinion for you soon.
pens_CT wrote:Jim wrote:pens_CT wrote:Jim wrote:Rodrigues wasn't part of the plan, Warsofsky is an AHLer.
Aberg is alos an AHLer and a RFA, maybe will not get qualified? Lindgren is an Addison replacement.
Kapanen, Lindgren for #15, Hallander.
Toronto fan reaction seems overwhelmingly that they love this trade for them.
I wonder if Rutherford simply has ZERO trust in his amateur scouts.
Another Rutherford trade in the L column for me.
You consider it a L because:
(A) You expect the first round pick would make the team next year
(B) You love seeing Simon on the first line
(C) You see Hallander as the next Markus Naslund
(D) You don't see next year's team as being a contender regardless of who they acquire, so they just might as well sell
I see it as a loss because it is gross overpay for the return. I see it as a bigger loss as I mistook which D was coming back. I am fine with Kapanen coming back to the Pens, I am not fine at it costing #15 and Hallander. Heck, that is basically what was paid for Zucker, and I wasn't a fan of that trade either, and Kapanen is no Zucker.
So you expect the 15th pick to be a better player than Kapanen in two to three years, which is probably the timeframe for that guy to be in the NHL. That might be true, it will also be true that Malkin may not be on this roster after his current contract expires and Sid would be 35 or 36. So if you're not in the win now mode, just blow it up. Everyone else in this deal is roster filler at the best.
Pitts wrote:Ottawa has 3 first round picks. One of them better be owned by the Pens very soon. And it better not be #22.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests