The non-goal was obviously a big deal, but it's not what cost them the game. They killed off the Ruutu penalty, which was taken at 4:21. The Canes didn't get the 4th goal until 8:00.
The Pens were still in the game until that point.
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

dagny wrote:I've strongly disagreed with all the criticism about the line shuffling. Yes, chemistry is more important than can be stated, however, these guys need to be able to play, contribute, produce with ANY linemates. That's how a good team survives. Your usual linemates aren't ALWAYS available. It's also important to see who can play together and who can't. These are youngsters, new to the NHL and Therrien needs to see what they can do.
I wanted Crosby and Malkin separated. First, Malkin looks so out of place, even lost most of the time. Second, I want to see him in his natural position. I want to see him make plays, and I think he'll be better utilized because that seems to be what he wants to do, as well. He's a brilliant center, but an above average winger.
I've been for the line experiments, and they haven't all been bad. They just need some time to get used to playing with other linemates. Once they get past that, the combos Therrien can send out there will be unstoppable and unpredictable. Versatility.
Besides, their biggest problem has been playing with discipline. That needs to be part of the character regardless of the mitigating factors.

booboo wrote:Three Stars wrote:booboo wrote:We need #87 to do something
useful for a change.
Saturday Nov 11, 2006 9:45 pm. The moment the first Pens fan turned on Sidney Crosby.
Nonsense. I love the kid. He just needs to be put in a position to produce.
I doubt he is, even if he grinds like crazy (and he did, especially in the second period tonight).

NIN wrote:dagny wrote:I've strongly disagreed with all the criticism about the line shuffling. Yes, chemistry is more important than can be stated, however, these guys need to be able to play, contribute, produce with ANY linemates. That's how a good team survives. Your usual linemates aren't ALWAYS available. It's also important to see who can play together and who can't. These are youngsters, new to the NHL and Therrien needs to see what they can do.
I wanted Crosby and Malkin separated. First, Malkin looks so out of place, even lost most of the time. Second, I want to see him in his natural position. I want to see him make plays, and I think he'll be better utilized because that seems to be what he wants to do, as well. He's a brilliant center, but an above average winger.
I've been for the line experiments, and they haven't all been bad. They just need some time to get used to playing with other linemates. Once they get past that, the combos Therrien can send out there will be unstoppable and unpredictable. Versatility.
Besides, their biggest problem has been playing with discipline. That needs to be part of the character regardless of the mitigating factors.
Very good post.
Just because their dek-hockey team keeps the same lines together that does'nt mean PROFESSIONAL hockey players HAVE to do the same thing. They have played more games of hockey with more different linemates then anybody here will ever know. Only when you find SUCCESS do you remain static. NHL coaches in todays game need to be able to think dynamically if they want to survive in this league. What works one night might not work the next.
Don't take my word for it, just ask Jack Adam's award winning coach Lindy Ruff of the NHL's point leading Buffalo Sabres. They rotate their lines around when things arent working and they are pretty successful at it yes???

Guido wrote:
However, THIS IS NOT A GOOD TEAM.
This is a young team with many free agents and first/second year guys that have never played before.
Guido wrote:Let them build confidence and cohesion with a few linemates first before shuffling them around. This will only lead to turn overs and few scoring chances as they will not know what their linemates tendencies are.

DelPen wrote:NIN wrote:dagny wrote:I've strongly disagreed with all the criticism about the line shuffling. Yes, chemistry is more important than can be stated, however, these guys need to be able to play, contribute, produce with ANY linemates. That's how a good team survives. Your usual linemates aren't ALWAYS available. It's also important to see who can play together and who can't. These are youngsters, new to the NHL and Therrien needs to see what they can do.
I wanted Crosby and Malkin separated. First, Malkin looks so out of place, even lost most of the time. Second, I want to see him in his natural position. I want to see him make plays, and I think he'll be better utilized because that seems to be what he wants to do, as well. He's a brilliant center, but an above average winger.
I've been for the line experiments, and they haven't all been bad. They just need some time to get used to playing with other linemates. Once they get past that, the combos Therrien can send out there will be unstoppable and unpredictable. Versatility.
Besides, their biggest problem has been playing with discipline. That needs to be part of the character regardless of the mitigating factors.
Very good post.
Just because their dek-hockey team keeps the same lines together that does'nt mean PROFESSIONAL hockey players HAVE to do the same thing. They have played more games of hockey with more different linemates then anybody here will ever know. Only when you find SUCCESS do you remain static. NHL coaches in todays game need to be able to think dynamically if they want to survive in this league. What works one night might not work the next.
Don't take my word for it, just ask Jack Adam's award winning coach Lindy Ruff of the NHL's point leading Buffalo Sabres. They rotate their lines around when things arent working and they are pretty successful at it yes???
But they were winning with the the lines during the win streak on offense and defense. But 10 minutes of adversity against an elite team cause Therrien to jumble everything up for the next 4+ games. Go back to what won.

DelPen wrote:NIN, the Sabres are deep enough that shuffing the lines gives a new look that's tough to defend. The same can't be said about the Pens. And the Lightning, Sens and Canes don't have a defensemen even close to Pronger or Nieds let alone two. It might have made sense that one game but now it's simply baffling that he hasn't gone back to those lines from a week ago.
NIN wrote:DelPen wrote:NIN, the Sabres are deep enough that shuffing the lines gives a new look that's tough to defend. The same can't be said about the Pens. And the Lightning, Sens and Canes don't have a defensemen even close to Pronger or Nieds let alone two. It might have made sense that one game but now it's simply baffling that he hasn't gone back to those lines from a week ago.
The argument that you should be more talented to be able to shuffle lines is not a good one. Trully dominating teams keep their lines intact because they are affective each and every night. Teams that are struggling to score goals need to shake things up, every team in the league does it these days. The more talented the team the LESS they shuffle, not the more.
It's true that the Pens need a scoring winger and maybe an offensive righty shot from the point (good luck finding that).

dagny wrote:Did you guys see Talbot tell that blonde, who walked by, to call him? Funny stuff!

DelPen wrote:NIN wrote:DelPen wrote:NIN, the Sabres are deep enough that shuffing the lines gives a new look that's tough to defend. The same can't be said about the Pens. And the Lightning, Sens and Canes don't have a defensemen even close to Pronger or Nieds let alone two. It might have made sense that one game but now it's simply baffling that he hasn't gone back to those lines from a week ago.
The argument that you should be more talented to be able to shuffle lines is not a good one. Trully dominating teams keep their lines intact because they are affective each and every night. Teams that are struggling to score goals need to shake things up, every team in the league does it these days. The more talented the team the LESS they shuffle, not the more.
It's true that the Pens need a scoring winger and maybe an offensive righty shot from the point (good luck finding that).
But I fail to see a logical argument against going back to:
Malkin-Crosby-Army
Ekman-Staal-Rex
Leclair-Moore-Ouellet
Thornburn-Talbot-Ruutu
They worked fine and faced a little adversity against two of the best teams in the NHL. If there's a good reason why those shouldn't be the 4 lines I'd love to hear it.
DelPen wrote:NIN wrote:DelPen wrote:NIN, the Sabres are deep enough that shuffing the lines gives a new look that's tough to defend. The same can't be said about the Pens. And the Lightning, Sens and Canes don't have a defensemen even close to Pronger or Nieds let alone two. It might have made sense that one game but now it's simply baffling that he hasn't gone back to those lines from a week ago.
The argument that you should be more talented to be able to shuffle lines is not a good one. Trully dominating teams keep their lines intact because they are affective each and every night. Teams that are struggling to score goals need to shake things up, every team in the league does it these days. The more talented the team the LESS they shuffle, not the more.
It's true that the Pens need a scoring winger and maybe an offensive righty shot from the point (good luck finding that).
But I fail to see a logical argument against going back to:
Malkin-Crosby-Army
Ekman-Staal-Rex
Leclair-Moore-Ouellet
Thornburn-Talbot-Ruutu
They worked fine and faced a little adversity against two of the best teams in the NHL. If there's a good reason why those shouldn't be the 4 lines I'd love to hear it.


Users browsing this forum: Scott and 5 guests