by dboss on Sat Feb 18, 2006 3:54 pm
I totally don't understand why anyone from FC would discuss this. Why not just say, 'Yes that is a very attractive part of our casino package and if we don't receive the slots license that portion of the package could be an option down the line.'
This explains why their revenue projections didn't include this part of the proposal. So, based on this shouldn't IoC's entire proposal generate more revenue than FC's??? That is definitely something IoC should explore. Basically because of this their proposal has gone from a $1 Billion proposal to $462 Million because all they are really building is a casino. I really feel like I am missing something here, because I can't find ANY positive's in this information being out there, only NEGATIVE's.
Another point that I like is how FC is totally contradicting themselves based on this statement, "The impact on Carson Street is going to be very little, because naturally this is a regional draw," McGurk said.' Weren't they touting this as a resort style casino where people all over america would come because of Harrah's customer base? I wonder if this guy McGurk will be looking for a job on Monday.