cs6687 wrote:Why does FSN show their 'pop-up ads' at the worst time during a game?
Excellent question.
Official Game Thread - 11/17 - Penguins vs. Sabres - 8:08pm
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
by Jesse on Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:40 pm
See, when you don't move on the 5 on 3, the defense doesn't move. So you can play pattycake on the blueline all night, but you aren't accomplishing anything.
We didn't shoot. We didn't move. We didn't put traffic in front.
We just stand there, and play pattycake.
Just passin back and forth. Whitney and Gonchar.
Talk about squandering chances. That was absolute garbage.
We didn't shoot. We didn't move. We didn't put traffic in front.
We just stand there, and play pattycake.
Just passin back and forth. Whitney and Gonchar.
Talk about squandering chances. That was absolute garbage.
- Jesse
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,658
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:07 am
- Location: The Land of Condescending Posters
by yeltzen on Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:43 pm
Scott wrote:You got that right.
Horrible 5 on 3
Oullette has no idea what to do out there. If he cant shoot it he is useless on the PP.
Ouellet's job is to score trash goals, not set the power play up. Yeah, he's useless if our D are going to play catch for 45 seconds on the PP.
- yeltzen
by Jim on Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:45 pm
NIN wrote:Jim wrote:4 straight blown passes by Whitney on that 5 on 3... great job!
If you are referring to Malkin being "open" you are dead wrong.
No I am refering to Whitney passing 6 feet in front og Gonchar 3 times so that Gonchar had to stretch out with his backhand just to get to the puck, and one pass behind Malkin when he was open in the corner area.
- Jim
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14,501
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:18 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh
by The U on Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:46 pm
You'd think Malkin and Crosby would be the go-to guys on the PP right? We sit there and all watch Gonchar shoot and wait for garbage goals?? Isn't that what our 2nd PP unit should be doing? Are you telling me that when Gonchar, Malkin, and Crosby are on the ice they're not skilled enough to make a "skilled" play to put the puck in the net?
On Buffalo's 5-on-3 PP the pointman on the touched the puck once or twice. All the action was along the goal crease. THATS a 5-on-3 my friends.
On Buffalo's 5-on-3 PP the pointman on the touched the puck once or twice. All the action was along the goal crease. THATS a 5-on-3 my friends.
- The U
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6,130
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:34 pm
by NIN on Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:47 pm
Jim wrote:NIN wrote:Jim wrote:4 straight blown passes by Whitney on that 5 on 3... great job!
If you are referring to Malkin being "open" you are dead wrong.
No I am refering to Whitney passing 6 feet in front og Gonchar 3 times so that Gonchar had to stretch out with his backhand just to get to the puck, and one pass behind Malkin when he was open in the corner area.
Oh that, yeah well on my tv, the camera man has the shakes and he is zoomed in 100000 times the norm. So other than the color of Biron's eyes I don't know what to say.
- NIN
by Gaucho on Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:48 pm
Those TSN guys totally suck. No respect whatsoever, absolutely pathetic. Malkin, they think, may not use an illegal stick, "but it's close". Well, it's either illegal or it's not and I guess it is not, huh, you idiots? Just one example of their biased stupidity...
Well, that 5-3 wasn't too hot. T-bo is sharp, though.
Well, that 5-3 wasn't too hot. T-bo is sharp, though.
- Gaucho
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 44,375
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:22 am
- Location: Ignoranti
by Fast B on Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:48 pm
The U wrote:You'd think Malkin and Crosby would be the go-to guys on the PP right? We sit there and all watch Gonchar shoot and wait for garbage goals?? Isn't that what our 2nd PP unit should be doing? Are you telling me that when Gonchar, Malkin, and Crosby are on the ice they're not skilled enough to make a "skilled" play to put the puck in the net?
On Buffalo's 5-on-3 PP the pointman on the touched the puck once or twice. All the action was along the goal crease. THATS a 5-on-3 my friends.
That is what drives me nuts. We have freaking Crosby and Malkin on the ice at the same time for almost the whole PP, and in all that time Crosby might touch the puck once. Why the hell are we throwing our superstars out there if we're going to handcuff them like this?
Last edited by Fast B on Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Fast B
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 5,059
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:36 pm
- Location: San Mateo, CA
by letsgopens66 on Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:48 pm
Does anyone know if our powerplay was better with Letang in the lineup?
- letsgopens66
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:13 pm
- Location: The land of the Florida Panthers
by Jesse on Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:49 pm
Better discipline in the neutral zone and a better breakout, but overall I'm dissapointed.
When a team like Buffalo takes two penalties in a row, you make them pay.
You don't sit on the blueline and have tea.
When a team like Buffalo takes two penalties in a row, you make them pay.
You don't sit on the blueline and have tea.
- Jesse
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,658
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:07 am
- Location: The Land of Condescending Posters
by NIN on Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:49 pm
The U wrote:You'd think Malkin and Crosby would be the go-to guys on the PP right? We sit there and all watch Gonchar shoot and wait for garbage goals?? Isn't that what our 2nd PP unit should be doing? Are you telling me that when Gonchar, Malkin, and Crosby are on the ice they're not skilled enough to make a "skilled" play to put the puck in the net?
On Buffalo's 5-on-3 PP the pointman on the touched the puck once or twice. All the action was along the goal crease. THATS a 5-on-3 my friends.
It was along the goal crease because our defensmen refuse to skate after them. Or, they know they will only fail to get back into position in time.
- NIN
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hugo Stiglitz and 3 guests