Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf





thehockeyguru wrote:Why do you say that? Who would you go after instead?

Malkamaniac wrote:cup keeper
jwienand
thehockeyguru
3 players who have been gone or participated very little.



thehockeyguru wrote:Looking back through the votes, it looks like Mac could be a possible double voter.
TEIB - 10 (NAN, rel, Zarovich, THG, MWB, npv, sdm, Kicksave, Troy, LITT)
NAN - 2 (mac)
Slappy - 6 (kicksave, rel, thg, npv, Zaro, Cup Keeper)
kicksave - 2 (mac)

Azkar wrote:That was just my messing up counting votes... sorry about that :p

Azkar wrote:That was just my messing up counting votes... sorry about that :p


mac5155 wrote:Azkar wrote:That was just my messing up counting votes... sorry about that :p
no worries, it's only you guys' first typo this game![]()


Rel - 2 (cup keeper, LITT)
LITT - 2 (Zaro, npv)
THG - 1 (rel)
sdm - 1 (thg)


cup keeper wrote:No votes from mac, sdm and jwienand.
thg why did you switch off to sdm?

thehockeyguru wrote:cup keeper wrote:No votes from mac, sdm and jwienand.
thg why did you switch off to sdm?
-Rel has contributed to the discussion and I am not just ready to vote him off just yet, even though he has done some questionable things. Especially during the Troy vote.
-Sdm was Kicksave's parting suspicion, he played a heck of a game and I think we should take a chance on it.
-Sdm has been rather quiet and hasn't offered much. As the numbers dwindle it would be nice to have around people who actually share ideas.

cup keeper wrote:No votes from mac, sdm and jwienand.
thg why did you switch off to sdm?

cup keeper wrote:thehockeyguru wrote:cup keeper wrote:No votes from mac, sdm and jwienand.
thg why did you switch off to sdm?
-Rel has contributed to the discussion and I am not just ready to vote him off just yet, even though he has done some questionable things. Especially during the Troy vote.
-Sdm was Kicksave's parting suspicion, he played a heck of a game and I think we should take a chance on it.
-Sdm has been rather quiet and hasn't offered much. As the numbers dwindle it would be nice to have around people who actually share ideas.
My counter argument will be that we had multiple write-ups over the weekend and sdm was not around.

mac5155 wrote:cup keeper wrote:No votes from mac, sdm and jwienand.
thg why did you switch off to sdm?
i am hesitant to vote - i dont want to make it 3 on a good guy and let a baddie jump in... but it appears neither of the other 2 are here.


cup keeper wrote:mac5155 wrote:cup keeper wrote:No votes from mac, sdm and jwienand.
thg why did you switch off to sdm?
i am hesitant to vote - i dont want to make it 3 on a good guy and let a baddie jump in... but it appears neither of the other 2 are here.
It takes 5 to shank so putting someone to three votes doesn't put them in immediate danger, the noon deadline does that. Basically you can decide whether to kill rel or LITT seeing as the other two aren't here.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest