DocEmrick wrote:It was not ps87
This was his post about ps.
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
DocEmrick wrote:It was not ps87


MWB wrote:Did Doc clear pittsport? I went back and looked, but I wasn't really sure.
The only person seeming suspicious to me is columbia. He's posting regularly, but not saying much. Maybe that's just because it's his first time (:pop:) though.





Troy Loney wrote:is there a time limit?

pittsports87 wrote:lynch cup keeper
He was a big target a few days ago and somehow survived. I always find something odd about that and think we could be letting a baddie get away.
But I am 0/2 this game, so who knows..

pittsports87 wrote:lynch cup keeper
He was a big target a few days ago and somehow survived. I always find something odd about that and think we could be letting a baddie get away.
But I am 0/2 this game, so who knows..



columbia wrote:pittsports87 wrote:lynch cup keeper
He was a big target a few days ago and somehow survived. I always find something odd about that and think we could be letting a baddie get away.
But I am 0/2 this game, so who knows..
0/2 at what?

MWB wrote:pittsports87 wrote:lynch cup keeper
He was a big target a few days ago and somehow survived. I always find something odd about that and think we could be letting a baddie get away.
But I am 0/2 this game, so who knows..
It seemed like cup keeper was a target based on the "he's always bad" philosophy. This was the same philosophy that got you some votes early on, right? Not saying we shouldn't consider him, but maybe we can come up with better reasoning for who we vote.

pittsports87 wrote:MWB wrote:pittsports87 wrote:lynch cup keeper
He was a big target a few days ago and somehow survived. I always find something odd about that and think we could be letting a baddie get away.
But I am 0/2 this game, so who knows..
It seemed like cup keeper was a target based on the "he's always bad" philosophy. This was the same philosophy that got you some votes early on, right? Not saying we shouldn't consider him, but maybe we can come up with better reasoning for who we vote.
It was that, and when he said "I'll wait for Doc before I vote". Stuff like that makes me think he is trying to hard to look blue.




pittsports87 wrote:MWB wrote:pittsports87 wrote:lynch cup keeper
He was a big target a few days ago and somehow survived. I always find something odd about that and think we could be letting a baddie get away.
But I am 0/2 this game, so who knows..
It seemed like cup keeper was a target based on the "he's always bad" philosophy. This was the same philosophy that got you some votes early on, right? Not saying we shouldn't consider him, but maybe we can come up with better reasoning for who we vote.
It was that, and when he said "I'll wait for Doc before I vote". Stuff like that makes me think he is trying to hard to look blue.








Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests