ulf wrote:lol @ benny fitz not posting since doc quit. wasn't he doc's friend?
think he was kraftster's friend.
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
ulf wrote:lol @ benny fitz not posting since doc quit. wasn't he doc's friend?


pittsports87 wrote:Yeah it was Kraftsters friend.


slappybrown wrote:Can we just run this with 22?




DocEmrick wrote:In.


the wicked child wrote:We might need to take a break. It's not really fair to tell someone who has worked hard to come up with a game designed for 25 people to just "man up" and play with 22. Taking 3 people out can totally change the balance of a game.
It's not like a simple WW game where you can add and remove an extra wolf as need be. I know rel and BCS have been planning this for awhile and I'm looking forward to the game. I'd rather wait to play it than bastardize it to appease a few people who want to play right now.

the wicked child wrote:I'd rather wait to play it than bastardize it to appease a few people who want to play right now.



DocEmrick wrote:Trust me, I'm a doctor.

pittsports87 wrote:DocEmrick wrote:Trust me, I'm a doctor.
Out of rehab so soon?



bhaw wrote:That's fine, I'm just saying that realistically, when you "need" 25, 5 of them don't play or participate, and it skews the game anyways.



bhaw wrote:slappybrown wrote:Can we just run this with 22?
Yeah, I think the problem is "needing" too many people. Realistically that last 3-5 don't really want to play but are just doing it, so you end up with a disinterested game.








Bob Cole's Senility wrote:Someone take initiative and create a dual account.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest