No Doc's Allowed Warz

[newarenanow]

lynch Benny

[columbia]

sdm-4 (nan, bhaw, columbia, hammertime)

With 7 to ban, and 4 votes on, I'd like to think that one of these players is bad. Not bhaw obvisouly, and I doubt hammertime has enough exp to know to jump on so early. Nan did a lot of "explaining" before making any moves. And what about columbia?

Why is bhaw "obviously" not bad?
Did I miss something earlier in the game?

[Benny Fitz]

Bhaw was a

Spoiler:

regular poster

Pms to me plox.

this is pretty obvious to me, but you know, ps87 could be pullin one over on us.

[pittsports87]

Shaf-2 (columbia, kraftster)
Benny-1 (nan)

6 to ban

[columbia]

Bhaw was a

Spoiler:

regular poster

Pms to me plox.

this is pretty obvious to me, but you know, ps87 could be pullin one over on us.

He caught shad's disease.

[Benny Fitz]

Bhaw was a

Spoiler:

regular poster

Pms to me plox.

this is pretty obvious to me, but you know, ps87 could be pullin one over on us.

He caught shad's disease.

i did? or you did?

[columbia]

I did, it appears.

[Benny Fitz]

The more i read through, the more comfortable I am picking Columbia out of that 4-some.

ban columbia

[Rylan]

Sorry guys I have been really busy this week. Columbia and Shad are being very suspicious to me. But because of the time when I got voted off for accidentally voting for someone who is dead, I am voting for:

ban shafnutz

[pittsports87]

Shaf-2 (columbia, kraftster)
Benny-1 (nan)
Columbia-1 (benny)

6 to ban

[columbia]

The more i read through, the more comfortable I am picking Columbia out of that 4-some.

ban columbia

I banned shad because of his behavior the day before, not him missing that canaan was dead.
I'm not sure what to say, if you try to apply that logic to me.

[MWB]

lynch Benny

Any particular reason?

[pittsports87]

Shaf-3(columbia, kraftster, Rylan)
Benny-1 (nan)
Columbia-1 (benny)

6 to ban

[Benny Fitz]

The more i read through, the more comfortable I am picking Columbia out of that 4-some.

ban columbia

I banned shad because of his behavior the day before, not him missing that canaan was dead.
I'm not sure what to say, if you try to apply that logic to me.

the shaf vote is only part of it. Along with my belief that one of those 4 who voted for sdm are bad. and after reading through ur's and nan's posts i think you seem much more likely.

[newarenanow]

lynch Benny

Any particular reason?

Not really.

When sdm had 3 or 4 votes, a few people jumped on bhaw. To me, I think one of the votes between 3-5 are probably bad as at that point they know the heat can be taken off of sdm.

Plus, if you look at his 2 or 3 post after his vote on bhaw, it seemed he was pushing bhaw in one, and in another, in a subtle way, tried to clear sdm.

It really could be nothing, but that is all I got right now.

[pittsports87]

It is still daytime people. Get to posting and banning!

[Benny Fitz]

any sign of Mac?

[columbia]

any sign of Mac?

On the board, yes.

[newarenanow]

any sign of Mac?

Yes.

[newarenanow]

I have

[newarenanow]

seen him

[newarenanow]

on the board

[newarenanow]

today.

[pittsports87]

lol

[MWB]

Torn on Benny. He can seem like he's steering the ship, which is obviously bad if he's bad. But he also has decent insight. Shaf has laid low since the Canaan thing, which seems unlike him.