Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

DocEmrick wrote:I wouldn't mind seeing the Crosby/Malkin/Staal line.
wrong thread.
Willie Kool wrote:Benny Fitz wrote:so my hunch is that at least 1 of the first 5 votes on the board might be your typical overly ambitious red.
I don't know if you can trust that either. It seems to be the typical 'first day, lynch Rylan' bandwagon.
Willie Kool wrote:Benny Fitz wrote:those that are here, i'm inclined to believe might be role players as they were most likely responsible for PM's recently.
A very interesting observation considering you were the third player to post after the write up.

Benny Fitz wrote:So you don't like either part of my reasoning? Interesting.
Benny Fitz wrote:Willie Kool wrote:Benny Fitz wrote:so my hunch is that at least 1 of the first 5 votes on the board might be your typical overly ambitious red.
I don't know if you can trust that either. It seems to be the typical 'first day, lynch Rylan' bandwagon.
Benny Fitz wrote:Willie Kool wrote:Benny Fitz wrote:those that are here, i'm inclined to believe might be role players as they were most likely responsible for PM's recently.
A very interesting observation considering you were the third player to post after the write up.

Willie Kool wrote:I don't know if you can trust that either.











shafnutz05 wrote:disappear obhave
Something about her behavior strikes me as kind of weird thus far.
Benny Fitz wrote:I think im going rel here. Along with my original line of thinking (1/5 being red), he's typically been the anti-day 1-bandwagoner yet he pounced on the 5th vote and claimed rylan's minimal post was "deflective".









Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests