Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf






Benny Fitz wrote:so redwill you dont have any powers, you were just speaking on behalf of columbia correct?





Benny Fitz wrote:mac if you dont cool it TEIB is gonna be peepin yo crib tonight!

TheHammer24 wrote:Clearly don't remember doing that post. If that was really the case, then my story doesn't match. If you want to lynch based on a lie that would have been so stupid to make if I was doing it to be deceptive, then okay. I have no reason to lie. I have one vote against. But u can be the super sleuth. Just wipe the egg off your face when you see I'm green.
TheHammer24 wrote:MWB wrote:Did you mean to say green?
I meant reg villager. Whatever color.
TheHammer24 wrote:I think he was also one of the last two to put away EPP which can be a red move (it was last game). I could get on board with a Benny vote. What does Kay-nihn think?
TheHammer24 wrote:Okay, so I just read through pages 7-16 rather quickly though. PS87 screamed good guy (green or blue) and Columbia went after him/her (did we ever figure this out)? He claims green though. I am big on not going after a claimed green because it's usually an horrible idea, but do we even know who the greens roles are? Can we even refute Columbia's claim? Just keep that in mind because it might explain his claim but attack evidence. What is Columbia's justification for PS87?
Redwill is now claimed green because Columbia used his resurrect power (allegedly), right? Is it possible that Columbia was originally an independent, then started working with redwill but the two are trying to blend as green? Does the game ever play out like that?
Benny was going hard after redwill after we said "We think a red will go after redwill." That could be flaunting what we said as an effort to make it look so stupid to deflect attention. Benny was also in late on some of the votes to finish people off.
I am not big on a Benny vote, but I also don't think Benny is green, so that's important. I guess, I'm somewhat sticking with Benny. However, the seer should definitely be looking at Columbia for his erratic play.
Gaucho was raising my eyebrows as I read, but I can't remember why any more.
TheHammer24 wrote:Okay. Let's figure something out. What roles are there? I am pretty new to this but it seems like you guys are assuming too much into what already seems like a kind of whacky game.
Gaucho doesn't really concern me any more, but it is strange that he kept going after PS87. His annoyance with non-participation seemed genuine though. I won't vote for Gaucho yet.
TheHammer24 wrote:I am thinking TEIB.
Here are a few questions. I have to run out for a few hours.
Can someone piece together what the writeups have said? How has the recruit process worked in the past?
And can someone, for the love of God, explain where we stand one Redwill? Are we okay with him just because Columbia's claim green?
And can someone explain WTF the seer is doing?
TheHammer24 wrote:there ya are. If u r the seer, I'm in trouble as I suggested u twice.the errey i breathe wrote:before this vote takes off and we can't night talk let me share my findings
TheHammer24 wrote:I'm so confused. Can someone give a general summary of how this stuff goes down in previous games?
I think MWB is a brilliant recruit. I think Willie Kool would make a good recruit just because he was blatantly blue, but I wouldn't move on that until we see more. I'd probably make a decent one, too, based on my criteria. However, i don't think it would be fair and based on the write up it doesn't seem like it is the case, that the recruit all took place in one night.
We still have the reds outnumbered 12-3. Assuming an independent or a recruit it could be at worse, something like 9-2-4.
I could get behind a TEIB vote or an IE vote based on the reasons you got on him last night. I wouldn't go against the non-parts but I would get behind the passive-parts. And for the love of God, could the seer tell us something?!?!?!



TheHammer24 wrote:When was Gaucho cleared. My long post previously said everyone had been cleared in one way or another except for Gaucho and Mac and Willie. To a lesser extent, Benny but he did get in second on Rylan, which would be a bizarre baddie move.
I'm on Board with Mac for reasons stated previously.

TheHammer24 wrote:No one thinks this is a bit off?Benny Fitz wrote:mac if you dont cool it TEIB is gonna be peepin yo crib tonight!
Maybe nothing but it seems like Benny was trying to accomplish something. However, the only plausible explanation is Mac is bad and Benny was recruited.
I like Mac more than Gaucho, still.



TheHammer24 wrote:Sigh.
This is only my second game, which is why I ask easy questions.
And moreover, TEIB saw me and said I was blue on night one -- most of those posts that you just quoted were before Night Five, which is well before the recruit occurred. (Unless you think it happened on Night 2, but that is inconsistent with Night two).

TheHammer24 wrote:
the errey i breathe wrote:before this vote takes off and we can't night talk let me share my findings
there ya are. If u r the seer, I'm in trouble as I suggested u twice.

redwill wrote:That post by mac is super-duper very defensive, no?




Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest