Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf


Malkamaniac wrote:wait he's going after Columbia isn't he?

Willie Kool wrote:I don't know about columbia. Kraftster and redwill, as good players, would be targets for anyone. At this point I think I like nan's vote yesterday for thg.
Lynch thg

Malkamaniac wrote:wait he's going after Columbia isn't he?
Sorry I just woke up. I meant columbia not shaf. It still holds true, a woflie going after someone just cause they voted for them in a game this big doesn't make sense at all and crpl seems to be trying to reason into that real hard.
columbia wrote:The way I view being a target of a bandwagon:
1. If I'm red, I'll eventually claim to be the Angel.
2. If I'm green, I'll eventually claim my actual role.
Since I won't be doing either, I think you can determine what I am.

Benny Fitz wrote:ahh arent you guys (+2girls) forgetting something?columbia wrote:The way I view being a target of a bandwagon:
1. If I'm red, I'll eventually claim to be the Angel.
2. If I'm green, I'll eventually claim my actual role.
Since I won't be doing either, I think you can determine what I am.
columbia already told us he was blue....

Benny Fitz wrote:ahh arent you guys (+2girls) forgetting something?columbia wrote:The way I view being a target of a bandwagon:
1. If I'm red, I'll eventually claim to be the Angel.
2. If I'm green, I'll eventually claim my actual role.
Since I won't be doing either, I think you can determine what I am.
columbia already told us he was blue....



columbia wrote:Meh. If nothing else, you're just proving that saying nothing early on is the best course and that leads to very dull games.

Malkamaniac wrote:lol people actually trust each other in these games?!

Pavel Bure wrote:Benny Fitz wrote:ahh arent you guys (+2girls) forgetting something?columbia wrote:The way I view being a target of a bandwagon:
1. If I'm red, I'll eventually claim to be the Angel.
2. If I'm green, I'll eventually claim my actual role.
Since I won't be doing either, I think you can determine what I am.
columbia already told us he was blue....
And I'm a Knight from King Arthur's court. If I said it, it must be true

columbia wrote:Malkamaniac wrote:lol people actually trust each other in these games?!
How many seer or angel role claims are disputed and lead to a kill by the green vig the next night?
Almost never.


shafnutz05 wrote:Willie Kool wrote:I don't know about columbia. Kraftster and redwill, as good players, would be targets for anyone. At this point I think I like nan's vote yesterday for thg.
Lynch thg
This was kind of my thought. Despite columbia coming after me, I'm not really sold that he is bad. It just seems like way too obvious of a set up.

Benny Fitz wrote:ahh arent you guys (+2girls) forgetting something?columbia wrote:The way I view being a target of a bandwagon:
1. If I'm red, I'll eventually claim to be the Angel.
2. If I'm green, I'll eventually claim my actual role.
Since I won't be doing either, I think you can determine what I am.
columbia already told us he was blue....

Crpl_Klinger wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:Willie Kool wrote:I don't know about columbia. Kraftster and redwill, as good players, would be targets for anyone. At this point I think I like nan's vote yesterday for thg.
Lynch thg
This was kind of my thought. Despite columbia coming after me, I'm not really sold that he is bad. It just seems like way too obvious of a set up.
That's true... just wanted to have something to base it off of... after watching a few of the last two games I'd say that some of the reds are the worst kind... silent but deadly... I'd be in favor of a strategy of getting rid of the silent players while the seer looks at those who are talking and then we can move forward....

canaan wrote:lynch BennyFitz his presumption to assume columbia is blue based on columbia just saying so makes me think he has the knowledge be more definitive than he should. could be just trusting on face value, but i doubt it.



shafnutz05 wrote:Edit: I meant Benny Fitz in the above post. Sorry.
emote should be in play no? 

shafnutz05 wrote:canaan wrote:lynch BennyFitz his presumption to assume columbia is blue based on columbia just saying so makes me think he has the knowledge be more definitive than he should. could be just trusting on face value, but i doubt it.
hmm....this logic seems weak. Willie Kool is a seasoned player. I was assuming he was sarcastic when he said columbia already told us he was blue, but I could have been mistaken.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest