WAREWUFF XXI GAME FRED!

[Pavel Bure]

Dear Jooce:
Hugs and Kisses,
Slappybrown

Soundgarden was very much a hipster band, when they hit the scene.
Just sayin'.

Whaaaa? Were there hipsters in the grunge era?

[columbia]

Dear Jooce:
Hugs and Kisses,
Slappybrown

Soundgarden was very much a hipster band, when they hit the scene.
Just sayin'.

Whaaaa? Were there hipsters in the grunge era?

Yes.

[columbia]

btw, save pavel
lynch shad

[shafnutz05]

Um....what? How in the world did my previous two posts somehow convince everyone beyond the shadow of a doubt that I am red. How am I wrong? We don't have a seer. ANYONE could claim to be the angel, and we would have no way of fact-checking it. Is this logic faulty somehow? Somebody coming out as the angel does not help us, because we still cannot be 100% sure that they are telling the truth.

If you want to go with me, then that's fine....I just have zero clue how that logic has somehow made me suspicious.

[canaan]

boat tawwy:

NAN - II
SHAD - IIII

IIIII IIII to winch

[shafnutz05]

I have my thoughts on the angel coming out. I don't care to make them known, at the moment.

save thg

lynch shad

dont like that last post.

What? You say you don't like my post, in which I fully described my reasoning why I don't see the angel coming out as helpful. In the same post, you give this weird, mysterious statement about "having your own thoughts" on why you DO want to see the angel, but don't elaborate at all.

[relantel]

shad sounds way to defensive, even if I agree with his position.

[mac5155]

I have my thoughts on the angel coming out. I don't care to make them known, at the moment.

save thg

lynch shad

dont like that last post.

What? You say you don't like my post, in which I fully described my reasoning why I don't see the angel coming out as helpful. In the same post, you give this weird, mysterious statement about "having your own thoughts" on why you DO want to see the angel, but don't elaborate at all.

Sometimes you don't want to give things away. I have a thought that I don't want out on the table at the moment. I'll make it known if/once the angel comes out.

[shafnutz05]

Meh...I'm blue, so won't be a big loss if I'm gone.

Rel, I know I'm defensive, but I'm a little flabbergasted that reasonable, sound logic could be met with four almost immediate votes. That raises red flags to me.

[newarenanow]

Your reasoning for the angel isn't the reason I'm voting for you.

[Zarovich]

lynch shad

[Sam's Drunk Dog]

lynch nan
I feel him and juice are acting as a pair and trying to steer the village in certain directions.

[PensFanInDC]

Lynch Juice

[mac5155]

PFIDC, care to add any discussion or just votes?

[Juice]

Um....what? How in the world did my previous two posts somehow convince everyone beyond the shadow of a doubt that I am red. How am I wrong? We don't have a seer. ANYONE could claim to be the angel, and we would have no way of fact-checking it. Is this logic faulty somehow? Somebody coming out as the angel does not help us, because we still cannot be 100% sure that they are telling the truth.

If you want to go with me, then that's fine....I just have zero clue how that logic has somehow made me suspicious.

you aren't thinking it all the way through, and that isn't like you

[Juice]

lynch nan
I feel him and juice are acting as a pair and trying to steer the village in certain directions.

the village is still too big to have 2 of 3 wolves sticking their necks out trying to steer it

[shafnutz05]

Your reasoning for the angel isn't the reason I'm voting for you.

Is it because I voted for you?

[shafnutz05]

save NAN

lynch Juice

[newarenanow]

Your reasoning for the angel isn't the reason I'm voting for you.

Is it because I voted for you?

It's how you did it.

[columbia]

Pavel and shad appear to be making the exact argument:

NAN is bad because he pointed out the obvious and the angel should stay hidden.

[Juice]

shad. stop. think it all the way through.

seriously the angel should come out.

[columbia]

Exact same argument, that is.

[Pavel Bure]

Exact same argument, that is.

What's your point?

[columbia]

Exact same argument, that is.

What's your point?

Only one of you is a target.

[Pavel Bure]

Exact same argument, that is.

What's your point?

Only one of you is a target.

You still have no point.