WAREWUFF XXI GAME FRED!

[MWB]

Um....what? How in the world did my previous two posts somehow convince everyone beyond the shadow of a doubt that I am red. How am I wrong? We don't have a seer. ANYONE could claim to be the angel, and we would have no way of fact-checking it. Is this logic faulty somehow? Somebody coming out as the angel does not help us, because we still cannot be 100% sure that they are telling the truth.

If you want to go with me, then that's fine....I just have zero clue how that logic has somehow made me suspicious.

Yes, that's faulty logic. It has already been pointed out how it would go down if someone who is not the angel claimed to be.

[newarenanow]

I can't speak for anyone else, but their theory behind the angel is not why I am voting for Shad.

[columbia]

You're smart enough to figure it out....maybe.

[shafnutz05]

Looking back to the writeup, I completely overlooked that it explicitly stated that the angel protected themselves. I completely missed this the first time around. That really sucks, and it is TMI, but it also bolsters the logic that the angel should come out. I retract my previous statement.

THAT'S why I thought the angel should remain anonymous. My bad.

[newarenanow]

Where is everyon else who is playing the game?

[columbia]

Where is everyon else who is playing the game?

They don't want to state anything obvious, because pavel will want to kill them.

[Pavel Bure]

You're smart enough to figure it out....maybe.

I see, you just never explain yourself while trying to cast doubt onto others. Just because red knows who the angel is does not make mean the angel should come out as I explained in previous posts. It really only helps the reds for the angel to come out because it gives them less things to slip up on. Like I said before, if the angel gets pressure on them, then they should come out and we can break down who was putting on the pressure and actually have something to go on. If the angel comes out now we take that chance away from ourselves. Even if it's a small chance at an advantage it should be kept around.

I'll break it down like this. Angel comes out now, great we know 1 townie for sure but have no other info to go on. Angel doesn't come out, gets pressure on, then comes out we have people steering a train and votes to look at to actually garner evidence from. It's a no brainer the angel shouldn't reveal themselves unless they have to.

[mac5155]

Looking back to the writeup, I completely overlooked that it explicitly stated that the angel protected themselves. I completely missed this the first time around. That really sucks, and it is TMI, but it also bolsters the logic that the angel should come out. I retract my previous statement.

THAT'S why I thought the angel should remain anonymous. My bad.

Come on.. it was explicitly stated a few posts after the write up...

[newarenanow]

Looking back to the writeup, I completely overlooked that it explicitly stated that the angel protected themselves. I completely missed this the first time around. That really sucks, and it is TMI, but it also bolsters the logic that the angel should come out. I retract my previous statement.

THAT'S why I thought the angel should remain anonymous. My bad.

Come on.. it was explicitly stated a few posts after the write up...

That, and he throws a vote on me where he says that I'm pushing the "what's good for the village rah, rah crap" a few times during the past couple of days. Go through my post, and I made one post regarding that. ONE.

I had one vote on me, a second might get the ball rolling, and he throws a generic excuse that has no merit so it looks like he has a reason to vote for me.

So to me, shad is either a) bad, and wants me out, (or anyone for that matter that might be participating) and wanted to get the ball rolling while making it look like he has a reason to vote, or b) he is not paying attention and that isn't good.

I don't know if he is 100% bad, but I feel better about voting for him than anyone else right now.

[PensFanInDC]

Several times I am accused of being "a good warz player who doesn't miss things like this". I'm going to use the same logic to:

save Juice

and

lynch Shaf

[mac5155]

huh?

[columbia]

Where's Juice and his who has posted in the thread tally?

[columbia]

I wouldn't mind a vote count either, mr. canaan.

[newarenanow]

Where's Juice and his who has posted in the thread tally?

I don't know, but I haven't seen any of thgs greatness posted here, and I'm keeping an eye on that.

[newarenanow]

Shad - 6 (NAN, Juice, mac, columbia, zaro, PFIDC)

NAN - 2 (Pavel, SDS)

Juice - 1 (Shad)

[Sam's Drunk Dog]

Save nan

Lynch zarovich

Color please.

He came in and threw a vote on the lead vote getter without any explanation. That seems red to me.

[newarenanow]

Shad - 6 (NAN, Juice, mac, columbia, zaro, PFIDC)

NAN - 1 (Pavel)

Juice - 1 (Shad)

Zaro - 1 (SDS)

Not voted: c2i, relantel, obhave, thg, slappy, malks, redwill, MWB, twisted wrister

[mac5155]

holy zarovich is playing ?

[columbia]

thx NAN

[shafnutz05]

haha good luck village....

[Juice]

Where's Juice and his who has posted in the thread tally?

i'm not going to continue that, it was a way for me to say that out of the people who had posted, there HAD (there i go speaking in absolutes again) to be a wolf, and we should focus on that group

[newarenanow]

I'm more shocked that there are 9 people that havent' voted, and most of them are regular contributors, or at least should have popped in a few times here and there. That is half the game players.

[Juice]

yeah that's ****

[shafnutz05]

save Juice

lynch Zarovich

I actually like SDD's logic on Zaro more than anyone. Tired of these quiet people getting away with murder. I was completely under the radar for the entire thread, made one post, and now I'm on my way out. WHAT ABOUT ME? WHAT ABOUT SHAD?

[Malkamaniac]

One of the random days where I actually had to work at work lol. I really dislike zaro's popping in and placing one vote idea. No explanation, no real reason outside of shad being the leading vote getter. That really screams suspicious to me.

Outside of actually voting for shad. I could see where he makes the mistake and he's been slightly defensive, I'm more inclined to vote for him however as it seems that his "confusion" could have been clear had the write-up of one sentence been read clearly.