Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

columbia wrote:I've pretty much ruled out zarovich and TW as reds; I suppose someone could be red and be that awol (for whatver reasons), but I'm going with "no".




columbia wrote:PB
thg
columbia
redwill
c21
malka
all voted for NAN




redwill wrote:Hiya folks. Sorry I haven't been around the last two day phases, but I simply wasn't available when it was daytime.
I honestly would've voted for mac the last two phases. I had a feeling about him on Day 1. That was obviously wrong, but there you go. nan would be a good target, since he pretty much led the charge on two blues: Willie Kool and shafnutz. But I think that's too obvious. I don't think a baddie would have been so bold.
I'm going to go with
lynch count2infinity
I think he's a very good player and has been laying relatively low and in a good position for a baddie.



MWB wrote:What do you mean when you say you'll stay with the nan train?

Pavel Bure wrote:MWB wrote:What do you mean when you say you'll stay with the nan train?
C2I train, can't edit posts, blah blah.

MWB wrote:Pavel Bure wrote:MWB wrote:What do you mean when you say you'll stay with the nan train?
C2I train, can't edit posts, blah blah.
Still doesn't make sense. There's one vote on c2i and a minute ago you were asking why he got voted for at all.

count2infinity wrote:i think what you mean to say is "self preservation, lynch c2i"
lynch nan

MWB wrote:count2infinity wrote:i think what you mean to say is "self preservation, lynch c2i"
lynch nan
I think you're reading a lot into that post. This is c2i's one post about nan that I could find.






Pavel Bure wrote:
Columbia is really just posting non-sense/jokes/I'll tag along with a good guy and immediately agreed with Slappy's fake angel theory.



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests