*** WW XXII Gameplay Thread ***

[Rylan]

Its a quiet look I voted so I am here play. I would rather have some group discussion with votes than just votes.

[columbia]

Its a quiet look I voted so I am here play. I would rather have some group discussion with votes than just votes.

I gotcha, but considering how screwed the village is....the best information - later in the game - will come from these early votes.

[Rylan]

Its a quiet look I voted so I am here play. I would rather have some group discussion with votes than just votes.

I gotcha, but considering how screwed the village is....the best information - later in the game - will come from these early votes.

I understand that as well. But also considering how screwed the village is, we can't make quick judgments. With losing 2 people to personal situations, the loss of 2 greens, we are getting into a deeper part of the game quicker than expected.

[Pavel Bure]

I'd like to hear more from THG. Why do you find it suspicious that people jumped on you when you did something out of your norm?

[relantel]

Yes. I know what I am, I don't know what anyone else is right now, and I know the only people that know i'm not bad are bad. If I were a blue I wouldn't jump on THG for making an accusation...that's what he's supposed to do. If I'm a red I might try to distance myself from votes that took out villagers early on in the game so I could point to my alliance with the village....and if say I were to get voted out now, you could say..."I wasn't part of the Troy Loney vote"

From my point of view, I know I am blue. I put a vote on you and within a few minutes I get (2) on me. That's what I find intriguing.

it's an easy play for someone who doesn't want to draw attention to themselves. Either they are not blue, or they are very self-serving blue.

Whose "play" are you talking about?

those that would jump on thg, for example

[thehockeyguru]

I'd like to hear more from THG. Why do you find it suspicious that people jumped on you when you did something out of your norm?

You must not have paid attention the last 4 or 5 games that I've played. Look over the threads if you'd like.

[Pavel Bure]

I'd like to hear more from THG. Why do you find it suspicious that people jumped on you when you did something out of your norm?

You must not have paid attention the last 4 or 5 games that I've played. Look over the threads if you'd like.

From what I remember you stayed very quiet until later in the games. The game I ran was out of line a bit because of the uniqueness of your role. Other than that you stay pretty quiet until late.

[thehockeyguru]

I chimed in from time to time, but I do think there is a greater sense of urgency this game compared to the last few with 2 Greens already gone.

[Rylan]

There should be more urgency considering we have lost 5 people in 2 days.

[Pavel Bure]

I chimed in from time to time, but I do think there is a greater sense of urgency this game compared to the last few with 2 Greens already gone.

Yeah that cluster makes no sense either in the sense of using a bullet this early without any information to go on.

[obhave]

I'm going to stick with my vote for thg right now. I have a review session for the next two hours, but I will try and check in before the deadline to see what has been discussed.

[Rylan]

I'm going to stick with my vote for thg right now. I have a review session for the next two hours, but I will try and check in before the deadline to see what has been discussed.

It has been a very nice 3 week vacation since my classes ended.

[obhave]

I'm going to stick with my vote for thg right now. I have a review session for the next two hours, but I will try and check in before the deadline to see what has been discussed.

It has been a very nice 3 week vacation since my classes ended.

[shafnutz05]

Vote Count:

THG - 2 - obhave, Pavel Bure
Rylan - 1 - Relantel
bhaw - 1 - NAN
Troy Loney - 1 - THG
columbia - 1 - Mac
NAN - 1 - Rylan

7 to lynch

[Pavel Bure]

I don't feel like looking, when's the deadline?

[thehockeyguru]

10am. It makes me uneasy that obhave slid in late on the ulf vote and now comes out after me for tossing a vote on TL.

[obhave]

10am. It makes me uneasy that obhave slid in late on the ulf vote and now comes out after me for tossing a vote on TL.

it says 6 pm deadline in the write up unless that has changed and I missed the change.

The day one vote was basically decided so I changed my vote. I "tossed" a vote on you, like I said, because you gave no reasoning for TL when you gave the vote, had said nothing else in the thread before the vote, and gave the vote right after someone said you hadn't spoken the first day.

[thehockeyguru]

I didn't give a reason? I put a vote on TL because I think he's red. Why do you put a vote on people?

[obhave]

I didn't give a reason? I put a vote on TL because I think he's red. Why do you put a vote on people?

are you serious about this? People in warz always get on others for not putting a reason for a vote. I am almost positive that you have done this to me.

[thehockeyguru]

I didn't give a reason? I put a vote on TL because I think he's red. Why do you put a vote on people?

are you serious about this? People in warz always get on others for not putting a reason for a vote. I am almost positive that you have done this to me.

How does it usually turn out?

[obhave]

I didn't give a reason? I put a vote on TL because I think he's red. Why do you put a vote on people?

are you serious about this? People in warz always get on others for not putting a reason for a vote. I am almost positive that you have done this to me.

How does it usually turn out?

How does what turn out? Giving reasons or not?

[thehockeyguru]

Just because someone votes on someone without giving a reason doesn't make them Red. Of all the games I've been in where you've played I have never seen you lead a vote on a red player. Why anyone would follow you on a vote is beyond me. Continuing to post your thoughts when they have no merit is really detracting from more pressing discussion.

[Pavel Bure]

Just because someone votes on someone without giving a reason doesn't make them Red. Of all the games I've been in where you've played I have never seen you lead a vote on a red player. Why anyone would follow you on a vote is beyond me. Continuing to post your thoughts when they have no merit is really detracting from more pressing discussion.

It's pretty hard to give a solid reason for anyone on day 2 anyway. It's all building information for later in the game through votes and who said what.

[obhave]

Just because someone votes on someone without giving a reason doesn't make them Red. Of all the games I've been in where you've played I have never seen you lead a vote on a red player. Why anyone would follow you on a vote is beyond me. Continuing to post your thoughts when they have no merit is really detracting from more pressing discussion.

I have led a vote on a red player, only once, but yes I have. I know I'm not good at this game and I'm still trying to figure it out. Doesn't mean I can't try to get better and contribute to the game. Just because I'm not good doesn't mean I can't get better or that my posts never have merit.

Please, go ahead start a discussion that is more important.

I get told every game that I don't contribute enough and when I do people get on me for it.

[thehockeyguru]

Please, go ahead start a discussion that is more important.

I've attempted, but I've seen 2 or 3 posts of yours saying your going to keep your vote on me. No offense, but to have a player who isn't that good attempt to lead a band wagon on me when there are more viable options out there means your Red, or your just don't know how to play.