canaan wrote:I think its a very plausible gambit to kill a seemingly trusting blue if you use that information to propagandize your position based on the death of "your fallen comrade". I think this situation is more than realistic looking at it from your perspective, especially given cbear's predilection to changing his mind.
So instead of likely having 4/5 votes and a conceivably easy time getting one more blue to go along, I decided to throw this ridiculous gambit?
canaan wrote:you've taken this gambit on your shoulders and if you get away with it, you'll be lauded for protecting a perfect game for the reds. If the gambit fails, you don't really lose that much because sdd gets axed tonight and were back at a similar stand off.
Is that how you guys figured to play it?
canaan wrote:I do believe you that this is the last day phase if we don't kill a red. I think you've been very forward in that regard in terms of how many reds their are.
At least you believe the obvious. If there were more than three, the game would already be over.