Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
jmh470 wrote:MAF has been jerked around his entire Pens career. Therrien himself has been guilty of this multiple times. The way he's been treated you would think that MAF is a border-line ECHL player.


The Futuristic Bird wrote:I just think's its simple: the goalie you project as your future backstop has to play. NHL, AHL, wherever you send him, he has to play. Period.

borohcky9 wrote:First off, Sabourin is not in any way in contention for the back-up job in Pittsburgh. How easily we forget about Thibault.
Second, Fluery should have gotten the opportunity in the first game of the series. He should be considered the go-to guy in WBS. That is the pressure that he needs to feel, so that he can develop into a big game player.
However, i am quite optomistic that Sabourin will not be able to maintain his stellar play, and MAF will get another chance to shine, and shine he will.

Jesse wrote:What about the rest of the team? What about Welch, Fernholm, Lannon, Talbot, Christensen, Filewich and the rest of the guys?
You obviously don't care much about the development of other players. I am so tired of reading people whine about MAF. MAF didn't win, Sabourin did. Sabourin shut out the opposition and gave the ENTIRE TEAM, ALL OF WHOM ARE POSSIBLY MEMEBERS of the FUTURE of the franchise a chance to win. Many members of the team would benefit greatly from a successful calder cup run. Let's not forget that.
This goes past MAF. It goes to Welch and all the other youngsters that would benefit GREATLY from a Calder Cup, regardless of what goalie takes them there.

jmh470 wrote:Jesse wrote:What about the rest of the team? What about Welch, Fernholm, Lannon, Talbot, Christensen, Filewich and the rest of the guys?
You obviously don't care much about the development of other players. I am so tired of reading people whine about MAF. MAF didn't win, Sabourin did. Sabourin shut out the opposition and gave the ENTIRE TEAM, ALL OF WHOM ARE POSSIBLY MEMEBERS of the FUTURE of the franchise a chance to win. Many members of the team would benefit greatly from a successful calder cup run. Let's not forget that.
This goes past MAF. It goes to Welch and all the other youngsters that would benefit GREATLY from a Calder Cup, regardless of what goalie takes them there.
You are making the Calder Cup sound like the Stanley Cup. Winning is important to young players but you are making it seem as if their development hinges on winning a trinket. All of the top prospects in WBS have their sights set on Pittsburgh and are simply trying to demonstrate their quality to the organization; whether that results in a Calder Cup or not is irrelevant. It is individual skill development that matters.

Jesse wrote:If the Calder Cup isn't important, why are people so upset when the team doesn't win it? Why were people so upset when Fleury couldn't get team Canada a gold?:
Jesse wrote: After all, if it isn't the Stanley Cup, it doesn't matter. At least by your logic.

jmh470 wrote:Who is upset? Everyone who has not tasted Errey's KoolAid knows that MAF is developing just fine.
Will playing 10-15 extra games in the minor league playoffs make or break one's development? I think not. Spezza did not win the Calder, and it doesn't matter to him at all, obviously. Army, Whitney, and Welch (probably) did not win that trinket and it will not matter to them either.
jmh470 wrote:Way to distort what I wrote.
Reading comprehension: try it sometime.

Jesse wrote:People are upset enough that there are threads being made and other posts about MAF not getting the start.
Jesse wrote: It's not about the number of games, it's about the conditions in which those games are played.
Jesse wrote:I highly doubt you would put a year of work into something to have it "not matter" whether or not you win.

jmh470 wrote:You contradict yourself. In your previous post you said people are upset when the team doesn't win the Calder. You are right when you say that people are upset that MAF isn't playing.
jmh470 wrote:With regard to the playoffs, this is correct. This is exactly why MAF should be starting every game. Futuristic's point about MAF being the most important prospect in WBS is dead on. I would say that MAF is BY FAR the most important player in WBS and should be treated as such. His development should not be secondary to winning a trinket.
jmh470 wrote:You totally misunderstand the purpose of the AHL. The top prospects in WBS primarily are trying to impress in order to earn a recall to the big show.

Jesse wrote:Try telling the people in WB/S that the Calder Cup is a trinket. Try telling guys like Christensen and even Colby Armstrong that it's a trinket. Hell, even ask MT. Go to a game in Wilkes-Barre before you speak, then you'll see. You'd be insulting a lot of people with your ignorant attitude.

jmh470 wrote:Jesse wrote:Try telling the people in WB/S that the Calder Cup is a trinket. Try telling guys like Christensen and even Colby Armstrong that it's a trinket. Hell, even ask MT. Go to a game in Wilkes-Barre before you speak, then you'll see. You'd be insulting a lot of people with your ignorant attitude.
Do you really think Army cares about the Calder? I bet he is counting the seconds until next season when (presumably) he is back on Crosby's wing.
Look, our ideologies on this issue obviously differ. I support playing the most important prospects, win or lose, so that they will develop in terms of skill and maturity. You seem to support building a winning atmosphere despite who is playing. Let's leave it at that.

The Futuristic Bird wrote:Giving Fleury experience in the Calder Cup playoffs, and getting a feel for what this is like and being successful in this environment, before he gets the chance to taste the Stanley Cup playoffs can only be seen as a positive for his development.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest