tifosi77 wrote:Some may infer that RS is trying to make him into a sympathetic character. Whether you call that glorification or painting him as a victim, it's essentially the same thing; a justification for 'outrage'.
(I personally don't see it that way, that's just how I'm interpreting things.)
oh, I have no idea then. I thought it was the image and not the blurb that caused the unease. I thought the blurb was rather innocuous as it seems to link Tsarnev's violence to family issues, which seems pretty conventional.