TheHammer24 wrote:I am not crazy about the Battle Royal. I would rather see a few more mid-card matches. If they want to elevate the IC title, how in the world can Big E not defend it at Wrestlemania? I guess Goldust-Rhodes will be in the battle royal, and we won't see them, as most had hoped. The WWE really has to emphasize these mid-card feuds. That's what builds future stars.
That said, we can all agree the Wrestlemania card is awesome, now, right? There are four main event caliber matches about which we should definitely care. Plus, Cesaro-Swagger in a feud payoff. Plus, the Shield, hopefully in a triple threat match, which will obviously be a MOTY candidate.
Every title should be defended at WM I agree. I think they should merge the US title and the IC title, cause right now neither title is worth a damn. Ambrose is defending his US title on main event tonight, how often has he defended that thing since he won it? 5 times maybe? The IC title used to be important, it used to be that you held that title as kind of a stepping stone to the World title.. now its just an afterthought.
You have plenty of tag teams, so no reason the tag titles shouldn't be defended. Hell make the NAO cost the USO's a non title match or something to build up a rematch for the Tag titles, where the USO"s can go over definitively, and the NAO can get their WM Payday and then go back to working in the back where they belong.
I would love to see a Rhodes vs Rhodes match, but I doubt that is happening, as they haven't even hinted at is as of yet. Though knowing WWE they will book it on a whim one week before the show.