TheHammer24 wrote:To this point, we had a lot of trouble with people not including their rookie keepers in the spreadsheet, then stopping people from making this pick. I think I said that this year an owner that does not include a rookie-keeping-eligibility keeper on the spreadsheet by the deadline loses that keeper.
Pitts wrote:Idoit40fans wrote:I do agree that moving forward, if the players aren't documented, you lose them.
Letang Is The Truth wrote:If we decided that we were doing tough **** approach I think your pick should stand - its my fault for not knowing that
Idoit40fans wrote:This is the 4th year in a row that Etem has been drafted. 2nd in a row that Hammer drafted him. viewtopic.php?f=5&t=47873&p=2276317&hilit=Etem#p2276317
Idoit40fans wrote:Why was it changed from Granlund?
Users browsing this forum: Cagsjr724 and 10 guests