Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf









beerman wrote:Open items..
1. I'm fine with either 8 or 10, my vote would be for 10 though.
2. There definitely should be some sort of buyout penalty, I'd be fine with whatever the remaining cap hit is for that player being the penalty. In most cases I can't imagine someone retiring so suddenly where someone would get stuck with a 5 year cap penalty. If someone retires I'd be surprised if they were signed for any more than 2 years.
3. I'm not sure what you mean by all qualifying players need to be signed to deals? If you mean the farm guys losing eligibility needing signed prior to the draft because of the rounds issue, I thought that was what we've been doing, that's at least how it was supposed to go last year.. You probably don't have to give them a contract in advance but I think you should have to designate whether they'll be mlb or farm prior to the draft.
4. I like 20, mainly because I'm not sure there are more than 220 worthwhile prospects. I think between prospects losing eligibility, getting injured and sucking as they move up the ranks you can probably turn over enough each year even if you've acquired 4-5 extra through the season.
5. Yahoo





beerman wrote:My only reason for yahoo is my other leagues are all on there and I don't have to remember to go elsewhere











Users browsing this forum: DudeMan2766 and 7 guests