MRandall25 wrote:Didn't they find reports that Schultz and the other guy (whose name escapes me) hid the abuse because it would be the "humane thing to do for Sandusky"?
Spanier.
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
MRandall25 wrote:Didn't they find reports that Schultz and the other guy (whose name escapes me) hid the abuse because it would be the "humane thing to do for Sandusky"?


columbia wrote:The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.

mac5155 wrote:columbia wrote:The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.
Something I've heard is they aren't getting too emotional in doing so, though. Just some food for thought.

mac5155 wrote:columbia wrote:The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.
Something I've heard is they aren't getting too emotional in doing so, though. Just some food for thought.


mac5155 wrote:columbia wrote:The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.
Something I've heard is they aren't getting too emotional in doing so, though. Just some food for thought.


mac5155 wrote:columbia wrote:The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.
Something I've heard is they aren't getting too emotional in doing so, though. Just some food for thought.


mac5155 wrote:columbia wrote:The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.
Something I've heard is they aren't getting too emotional in doing so, though. Just some food for thought.



shafnutz05 wrote:I would certainly hope not

Factorial wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:I would certainly hope not
But you think it's possible that is what is going on? A conspiracy to (insert reason here)?

shafnutz05 wrote:Factorial wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:I would certainly hope not
But you think it's possible that is what is going on? A conspiracy to (insert reason here)?
Sorry, I was referring to Mac's train of thought, and what he was possibly insinuating.

Troy Loney wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:Factorial wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:I would certainly hope not
But you think it's possible that is what is going on? A conspiracy to (insert reason here)?
Sorry, I was referring to Mac's train of thought, and what he was possibly insinuating.
Yeah, I'm curious as to what Mac's train of thought was with that post.

Troy Loney wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:Factorial wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:I would certainly hope not
But you think it's possible that is what is going on? A conspiracy to (insert reason here)?
Sorry, I was referring to Mac's train of thought, and what he was possibly insinuating.
Yeah, I'm curious as to what Mac's train of thought was with that post.


Factorial wrote:Troy Loney wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:Factorial wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:I would certainly hope not
But you think it's possible that is what is going on? A conspiracy to (insert reason here)?
Sorry, I was referring to Mac's train of thought, and what he was possibly insinuating.
Yeah, I'm curious as to what Mac's train of thought was with that post.
He's obviously a loyalist and doesn't want to believe the worst. I can understand that.

shafnutz05 wrote:I think most Penn State "loyalists" are ready to see this guy hung by his balls

shafnutz05 wrote:I think most Penn State "loyalists" are ready to see this guy hung by his balls

Troy Loney wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:I think most Penn State "loyalists" are ready to see this guy hung by his balls
What exactly do the loyalists want to do with the people that orchestrated the coverup?



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests